JATTX vs. JGLTX
Compare and contrast key facts about Janus Henderson Triton Fund Class T (JATTX) and Janus Henderson VIT Global Technology and Innovation Portfolio (JGLTX).
JATTX is managed by Janus Henderson. It was launched on Feb 25, 2005. JGLTX is managed by Janus Henderson. It was launched on Jan 17, 2000.
Performance
JATTX vs. JGLTX - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
JATTX vs. JGLTX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
JATTX Janus Henderson Triton Fund Class T | -1.40% | 9.54% | 10.30% | 14.52% | -23.75% | 6.63% | 28.41% | 28.30% | -5.25% | 26.90% |
JGLTX Janus Henderson VIT Global Technology and Innovation Portfolio | -7.02% | 25.19% | 32.10% | 54.55% | -36.42% | 18.28% | 50.42% | 45.29% | 1.17% | 45.17% |
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, JATTX achieves a -1.40% return, which is significantly higher than JGLTX's -7.02% return. Over the past 10 years, JATTX has underperformed JGLTX with an annualized return of 9.25%, while JGLTX has yielded a comparatively higher 20.70% annualized return.
JATTX
- 1D
- 3.90%
- 1M
- -6.19%
- YTD
- -1.40%
- 6M
- 3.56%
- 1Y
- 16.18%
- 3Y*
- 8.63%
- 5Y*
- 1.65%
- 10Y*
- 9.25%
JGLTX
- 1D
- 3.97%
- 1M
- -7.40%
- YTD
- -7.02%
- 6M
- -6.55%
- 1Y
- 27.79%
- 3Y*
- 24.91%
- 5Y*
- 11.25%
- 10Y*
- 20.70%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
JATTX vs. JGLTX - Expense Ratio Comparison
JATTX has a 0.91% expense ratio, which is higher than JGLTX's 0.72% expense ratio.
Return for Risk
JATTX vs. JGLTX — Risk / Return Rank
JATTX
JGLTX
JATTX vs. JGLTX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Janus Henderson Triton Fund Class T (JATTX) and Janus Henderson VIT Global Technology and Innovation Portfolio (JGLTX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| JATTX | JGLTX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 0.79 | 1.17 | -0.38 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 1.25 | 1.74 | -0.49 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.16 | 1.24 | -0.08 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.14 | 1.81 | -0.67 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 4.70 | 6.15 | -1.44 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| JATTX | JGLTX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.79 | 1.17 | -0.38 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.08 | 0.44 | -0.35 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.45 | 0.85 | -0.40 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.50 | 0.30 | +0.20 |
Correlation
The correlation between JATTX and JGLTX is 0.84, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.
Dividends
JATTX vs. JGLTX - Dividend Comparison
JATTX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 11.70%, more than JGLTX's 9.66% yield.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
JATTX Janus Henderson Triton Fund Class T | 11.70% | 11.54% | 7.74% | 7.29% | 6.35% | 20.71% | 4.17% | 4.30% | 7.56% | 5.11% | 2.83% | 7.89% |
JGLTX Janus Henderson VIT Global Technology and Innovation Portfolio | 9.66% | 8.98% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 26.96% | 14.48% | 7.71% | 6.81% | 4.95% | 5.68% | 3.71% | 16.11% |
Drawdowns
JATTX vs. JGLTX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum JATTX drawdown since its inception was -57.77%, smaller than the maximum JGLTX drawdown of -81.78%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for JATTX and JGLTX.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| JATTX | JGLTX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -57.77% | -81.78% | +24.01% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -13.20% | -15.81% | +2.61% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -31.90% | -45.18% | +13.28% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -39.71% | -45.18% | +5.47% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -7.62% | -12.47% | +4.85% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -8.82% | -36.82% | +28.00% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 3.19% | 4.65% | -1.46% |
Volatility
JATTX vs. JGLTX - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Janus Henderson Triton Fund Class T (JATTX) is 7.34%, while Janus Henderson VIT Global Technology and Innovation Portfolio (JGLTX) has a volatility of 8.22%. This indicates that JATTX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than JGLTX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| JATTX | JGLTX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 7.34% | 8.22% | -0.88% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 11.95% | 16.11% | -4.16% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 20.44% | 25.28% | -4.84% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 19.52% | 25.93% | -6.41% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 20.53% | 24.31% | -3.78% |