PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
JATAX vs. BOGSX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

JATAX vs. BOGSX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Janus Henderson Global Technology and Innovation Fund Class A (JATAX) and Black Oak Emerging Technology Fund (BOGSX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, JATAX achieves a 33.81% return, which is significantly lower than BOGSX's 40.12% return. Over the past 10 years, JATAX has outperformed BOGSX with an annualized return of 24.29%, while BOGSX has yielded a comparatively lower 17.60% annualized return.


JATAX

1D
3.11%
1M
18.92%
YTD
33.81%
6M
34.24%
1Y
59.82%
3Y*
36.36%
5Y*
18.49%
10Y*
24.29%

BOGSX

1D
1.69%
1M
13.07%
YTD
40.12%
6M
41.23%
1Y
61.25%
3Y*
24.18%
5Y*
13.16%
10Y*
17.60%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

JATAX vs. BOGSX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
JATAX
Janus Henderson Global Technology and Innovation Fund Class A
33.81%24.77%32.09%55.02%-37.75%17.31%50.90%45.36%0.72%44.47%
BOGSX
Black Oak Emerging Technology Fund
40.12%19.06%9.25%17.79%-27.30%26.89%45.16%38.20%-4.94%19.05%

Correlation

The correlation between JATAX and BOGSX is 0.78, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.78

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.84

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.88

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.88

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 7, 2009

0.88

The correlation between JATAX and BOGSX shifts across timeframes, from 0.78 (1 year) to 0.88 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

JATAX vs. BOGSX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

JATAX
JATAX Risk / Return Rank: 7878
Overall Rank
JATAX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9090
Sharpe Ratio Rank
JATAX Sortino Ratio Rank: 7676
Sortino Ratio Rank
JATAX Omega Ratio Rank: 7474
Omega Ratio Rank
JATAX Calmar Ratio Rank: 8282
Calmar Ratio Rank
JATAX Martin Ratio Rank: 6767
Martin Ratio Rank

BOGSX
BOGSX Risk / Return Rank: 8484
Overall Rank
BOGSX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8989
Sharpe Ratio Rank
BOGSX Sortino Ratio Rank: 7575
Sortino Ratio Rank
BOGSX Omega Ratio Rank: 7070
Omega Ratio Rank
BOGSX Calmar Ratio Rank: 9494
Calmar Ratio Rank
BOGSX Martin Ratio Rank: 9292
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

JATAX vs. BOGSX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Janus Henderson Global Technology and Innovation Fund Class A (JATAX) and Black Oak Emerging Technology Fund (BOGSX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


JATAXBOGSXDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

2.96

2.91

+0.05

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

3.64

3.63

+0.01

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.49

1.47

+0.01

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

3.80

5.61

-1.81

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

13.04

19.28

-6.25

JATAX vs. BOGSX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current JATAX Sharpe Ratio is 2.96, which is comparable to the BOGSX Sharpe Ratio of 2.91. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of JATAX and BOGSX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


JATAXBOGSXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.96

2.91

+0.05

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.70

0.52

+0.18

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.99

0.72

+0.27

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.94

0.11

+0.83

Drawdowns

JATAX vs. BOGSX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum JATAX drawdown since its inception was -46.55%, smaller than the maximum BOGSX drawdown of -92.80%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for JATAX and BOGSX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


JATAXBOGSXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-46.55%

-92.80%

+46.25%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-15.97%

-11.04%

-4.93%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-23.96%

-24.78%

+0.82%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-46.55%

-33.93%

-12.62%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-46.55%

-33.93%

-12.62%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

0.00%

0.00%

0.00%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-6.78%

-58.97%

+52.19%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

4.65%

3.21%

+1.44%

Volatility

JATAX vs. BOGSX - Volatility Comparison

Janus Henderson Global Technology and Innovation Fund Class A (JATAX) and Black Oak Emerging Technology Fund (BOGSX) have volatilities of 6.74% and 6.56%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


JATAXBOGSXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

6.74%

6.56%

+0.18%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

17.00%

16.63%

+0.37%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

20.70%

21.41%

-0.71%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

26.43%

25.20%

+1.23%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

24.57%

24.60%

-0.03%

JATAX vs. BOGSX - Expense Ratio Comparison

JATAX has a 1.00% expense ratio, which is lower than BOGSX's 1.03% expense ratio.


Dividends

JATAX vs. BOGSX - Dividend Comparison

JATAX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 10.62%, more than BOGSX's 4.11% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
BOGSX
Black Oak Emerging Technology Fund
4.11%5.76%7.96%3.79%1.87%11.31%6.30%5.47%11.71%7.71%4.00%3.09%
JATAX
Janus Henderson Global Technology and Innovation Fund Class A
10.62%14.21%12.24%0.80%0.00%16.47%9.16%9.08%6.63%7.63%4.92%7.87%

Frequently Asked Questions


JATAX and BOGSX have a correlation of 0.78, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

JATAX has higher volatility (6.74%) compared to BOGSX (6.56%). In terms of maximum drawdown, JATAX dropped -46.55% vs BOGSX's -92.80%.

JATAX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.96 vs 2.91), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for JATAX and BOGSX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer