PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
JARTX vs. JNGLX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

JARTX vs. JNGLX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Janus Henderson Forty Fund (JARTX) and Janus Henderson Global Life Sciences Fund (JNGLX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, JARTX achieves a -0.18% return, which is significantly lower than JNGLX's 9.53% return. Over the past 10 years, JARTX has outperformed JNGLX with an annualized return of 15.19%, while JNGLX has yielded a comparatively lower 11.16% annualized return.


JARTX

1D
3.26%
1M
-2.88%
6M
2.66%
YTD
-0.18%
1Y
6.22%
3Y*
16.78%
5Y*
7.27%
10Y*
15.19%
ALL TIME*
12.21%

JNGLX

1D
-0.67%
1M
-1.71%
6M
8.69%
YTD
9.53%
1Y
41.17%
3Y*
13.42%
5Y*
8.67%
10Y*
11.16%
ALL TIME*
11.53%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison


PositionAvg. Volume Value (2W)Avg. Volume Value (1M)Avg. Volume Value (3M)
$0.00$0.00$0.00
$0.00$0.00$0.00

JARTX vs. JNGLX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
JARTX
Janus Henderson Forty Fund
-0.18%17.88%27.76%39.50%-33.81%22.30%38.69%36.30%1.10%29.05%
JNGLX
Janus Henderson Global Life Sciences Fund
9.53%24.84%3.60%7.51%-2.69%6.78%25.66%29.20%4.17%22.13%

Correlation

The correlation between JARTX and JNGLX is 0.21, which is low. Their historical price movements had little consistent relationship.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.

0.21

Correlation (3Y)
Balances recent behavior with more history.

0.41

Correlation (5Y)
Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period.

0.56

Correlation (10Y)
Provides a long-term view across more market conditions.

0.63

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 4, 1999

0.72

Over the past year, the correlation between JARTX and JNGLX has dropped to 0.21 - well below their long-term average of 0.72, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

JARTX vs. JNGLX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

JARTX
JARTX Risk / Return Rank: 88
Overall Rank
JARTX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 88
Sharpe Ratio Rank
JARTX Sortino Ratio Rank: 88
Sortino Ratio Rank
JARTX Omega Ratio Rank: 88
Omega Ratio Rank
JARTX Calmar Ratio Rank: 77
Calmar Ratio Rank
JARTX Martin Ratio Rank: 88
Martin Ratio Rank

JNGLX
JNGLX Risk / Return Rank: 9292
Overall Rank
JNGLX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9595
Sharpe Ratio Rank
JNGLX Sortino Ratio Rank: 9292
Sortino Ratio Rank
JNGLX Omega Ratio Rank: 8686
Omega Ratio Rank
JNGLX Calmar Ratio Rank: 9595
Calmar Ratio Rank
JNGLX Martin Ratio Rank: 9191
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

JARTX vs. JNGLX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Janus Henderson Forty Fund (JARTX) and Janus Henderson Global Life Sciences Fund (JNGLX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


JARTXJNGLXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-2.32

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-3.22

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.05

1.43

-0.38

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

0.20

4.11

-3.90

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

0.62

12.85

-12.23

JARTX vs. JNGLX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current JARTX Sharpe Ratio is 0.20, which is lower than the JNGLX Sharpe Ratio of 2.52. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of JARTX and JNGLX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

JARTX vs. JNGLX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum JARTX drawdown since its inception was -56.70%, roughly equal to the maximum JNGLX drawdown of -59.00%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for JARTX and JNGLX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


JARTXJNGLXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-56.70%

-59.00%

+2.30%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-19.19%

-9.68%

-9.51%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-22.22%

-21.17%

-1.05%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-41.09%

-22.21%

-18.88%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-41.09%

-27.37%

-13.72%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-8.25%

-2.51%

-5.74%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-16.77%

-17.56%

+0.79%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

6.34%

3.09%

+3.25%

Volatility

JARTX vs. JNGLX - Volatility Comparison

Janus Henderson Forty Fund (JARTX) has a higher volatility of 6.04% compared to Janus Henderson Global Life Sciences Fund (JNGLX) at 5.23%. This indicates that JARTX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than JNGLX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


JARTXJNGLXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

6.04%

5.23%

+0.81%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

15.83%

12.28%

+3.55%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

19.50%

15.75%

+3.75%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

22.34%

16.11%

+6.23%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

21.59%

17.38%

+4.21%

JARTX vs. JNGLX - Expense Ratio Comparison

JARTX has a 1.20% expense ratio, which is higher than JNGLX's 0.80% expense ratio.


Dividends

JARTX vs. JNGLX - Dividend Comparison

JARTX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 13.68%, more than JNGLX's 4.17% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
JARTX
Janus Henderson Forty Fund
13.68%13.65%11.51%9.10%0.06%10.26%8.38%7.05%8.95%14.50%6.57%15.93%
JNGLX
Janus Henderson Global Life Sciences Fund
4.17%4.56%5.84%4.26%0.25%9.85%7.80%6.23%13.32%0.89%0.30%8.81%

Frequently Asked Questions


JARTX and JNGLX have a correlation of 0.21, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

JARTX has higher volatility (6.04%) compared to JNGLX (5.23%). In terms of maximum drawdown, JARTX dropped -56.70% vs JNGLX's -59.00%.

JNGLX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.52 vs 0.20), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for JARTX and JNGLX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer