JARTX vs. JGLTX
Compare and contrast key facts about Janus Henderson Forty Fund (JARTX) and Janus Henderson VIT Global Technology and Innovation Portfolio (JGLTX).
JARTX is managed by Janus Henderson. It was launched on May 1, 1997. JGLTX is managed by Janus Henderson. It was launched on Jan 17, 2000.
Performance
JARTX vs. JGLTX - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
JARTX vs. JGLTX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
JARTX Janus Henderson Forty Fund | -16.07% | 17.88% | 27.76% | 39.50% | -33.81% | 22.30% | 38.69% | 36.30% | 1.10% | 29.05% |
JGLTX Janus Henderson VIT Global Technology and Innovation Portfolio | -10.57% | 25.19% | 32.10% | 54.55% | -36.42% | 18.28% | 50.42% | 45.29% | 1.17% | 45.17% |
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, JARTX achieves a -16.07% return, which is significantly lower than JGLTX's -10.57% return. Over the past 10 years, JARTX has underperformed JGLTX with an annualized return of 13.90%, while JGLTX has yielded a comparatively higher 20.23% annualized return.
JARTX
- 1D
- -0.49%
- 1M
- -8.91%
- YTD
- -16.07%
- 6M
- -15.92%
- 1Y
- 8.52%
- 3Y*
- 15.66%
- 5Y*
- 7.00%
- 10Y*
- 13.90%
JGLTX
- 1D
- -1.43%
- 1M
- -10.72%
- YTD
- -10.57%
- 6M
- -9.78%
- 1Y
- 24.46%
- 3Y*
- 23.30%
- 5Y*
- 11.02%
- 10Y*
- 20.23%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
JARTX vs. JGLTX - Expense Ratio Comparison
JARTX has a 1.20% expense ratio, which is higher than JGLTX's 0.72% expense ratio.
Return for Risk
JARTX vs. JGLTX — Risk / Return Rank
JARTX
JGLTX
JARTX vs. JGLTX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Janus Henderson Forty Fund (JARTX) and Janus Henderson VIT Global Technology and Innovation Portfolio (JGLTX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| JARTX | JGLTX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 0.35 | 0.95 | -0.61 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 0.66 | 1.46 | -0.81 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.09 | 1.20 | -0.11 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 0.25 | 1.29 | -1.04 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 0.87 | 4.44 | -3.57 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| JARTX | JGLTX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.35 | 0.95 | -0.61 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.32 | 0.43 | -0.11 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.65 | 0.84 | -0.18 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.55 | 0.29 | +0.26 |
Correlation
The correlation between JARTX and JGLTX is 0.88, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.
Dividends
JARTX vs. JGLTX - Dividend Comparison
JARTX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 16.27%, more than JGLTX's 10.04% yield.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
JARTX Janus Henderson Forty Fund | 16.27% | 13.65% | 11.51% | 9.10% | 0.06% | 10.26% | 8.38% | 7.05% | 8.95% | 14.50% | 6.57% | 15.93% |
JGLTX Janus Henderson VIT Global Technology and Innovation Portfolio | 10.04% | 8.98% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 26.96% | 14.48% | 7.71% | 6.81% | 4.95% | 5.68% | 3.71% | 16.11% |
Drawdowns
JARTX vs. JGLTX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum JARTX drawdown since its inception was -56.70%, smaller than the maximum JGLTX drawdown of -81.78%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for JARTX and JGLTX.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| JARTX | JGLTX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -56.70% | -81.78% | +25.08% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -19.19% | -15.81% | -3.38% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -41.09% | -45.18% | +4.09% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -41.09% | -45.18% | +4.09% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -19.19% | -15.81% | -3.38% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -16.91% | -36.83% | +19.92% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 5.53% | 4.58% | +0.95% |
Volatility
JARTX vs. JGLTX - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Janus Henderson Forty Fund (JARTX) is 6.14%, while Janus Henderson VIT Global Technology and Innovation Portfolio (JGLTX) has a volatility of 6.94%. This indicates that JARTX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than JGLTX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| JARTX | JGLTX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 6.14% | 6.94% | -0.80% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 13.00% | 15.62% | -2.62% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 22.54% | 25.03% | -2.49% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 21.90% | 25.89% | -3.99% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 21.33% | 24.28% | -2.95% |