JAPN vs. CLIP

Last updated Jun 4, 2026

JAPN (Horizon Kinetics Japan Owner Operator ETF) and CLIP (Global X 1-3 Month T-Bill ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - JAPN is a Japan Equities fund actively managed by Horizon, while CLIP is a Ultrashort Bond fund tracking the Solactive 1-3 month US T-Bill Index - USD. JAPN is actively managed, while CLIP is passively managed. Over the past year, JAPN returned -16.72% vs 3.96% for CLIP. At a correlation of -0.10, they often move in opposite directions. JAPN charges 0.85%/yr vs 0.07%/yr for CLIP.

Performance

JAPN vs. CLIP - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Horizon Kinetics Japan Owner Operator ETF (JAPN) and Global X 1-3 Month T-Bill ETF (CLIP). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, JAPN achieves a -13.33% return, which is significantly lower than CLIP's 1.50% return.

JAPN

• 1D: -1.75%
• 1M: -2.99%
• YTD: -13.33%
• 6M: -13.01%
• 1Y: -16.72%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

CLIP

• 1D: 0.01%
• 1M: 0.28%
• YTD: 1.50%
• 6M: 1.82%
• 1Y: 3.96%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

JAPN vs. CLIP - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025
JAPN Horizon Kinetics Japan Owner Operator ETF	-13.33%	2.80%
CLIP Global X 1-3 Month T-Bill ETF	1.50%	2.69%

Correlation

The correlation between JAPN and CLIP is -0.13, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	-0.13
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since May 14, 2025	-0.10

Return for Risk

JAPN vs. CLIP — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

JAPN

JAPN Risk / Return Rank: 2
JAPN Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2
JAPN Sortino Ratio Rank: 3
JAPN Omega Ratio Rank: 2
JAPN Calmar Ratio Rank: 3
JAPN Martin Ratio Rank: 2

CLIP

CLIP Risk / Return Rank: 100
CLIP Sharpe Ratio Rank: 100
CLIP Sortino Ratio Rank: 100
CLIP Omega Ratio Rank: 100
CLIP Calmar Ratio Rank: 100
CLIP Martin Ratio Rank: 100

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

JAPN vs. CLIP - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Horizon Kinetics Japan Owner Operator ETF (JAPN) and Global X 1-3 Month T-Bill ETF (CLIP). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	JAPN	CLIP	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	-0.90	17.26	-18.15
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	-1.18	72.02	-73.21
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	0.86	20.66	-19.80
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	-0.70	142.22	-142.92
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	-1.34	1,151.15	-1,152.48
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

JAPN vs. CLIP - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current JAPN Sharpe Ratio is -0.90, which is lower than the CLIP Sharpe Ratio of 17.26. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of JAPN and CLIP, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	JAPN	CLIP	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	-0.90	17.26	-18.15
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	-0.54	10.71	-11.25

Drawdowns

JAPN vs. CLIP - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum JAPN drawdown since its inception was -23.94%, which is greater than CLIP's maximum drawdown of -0.08%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for JAPN and CLIP.

Drawdown Indicators

	JAPN	CLIP	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-23.94%	-0.08%	-23.86%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-23.94%	-0.03%	-23.91%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-22.90%	0.00%	-22.90%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-9.47%	-0.00%	-9.47%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	12.54%	0.00%	+12.54%

Volatility

JAPN vs. CLIP - Volatility Comparison

Horizon Kinetics Japan Owner Operator ETF (JAPN) has a higher volatility of 4.33% compared to Global X 1-3 Month T-Bill ETF (CLIP) at 0.06%. This indicates that JAPN's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than CLIP based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	JAPN	CLIP	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	4.33%	0.06%	+4.27%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	15.41%	0.14%	+15.27%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	18.77%	0.23%	+18.54%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	19.24%	0.44%	+18.80%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	19.24%	0.44%	+18.80%

JAPN vs. CLIP - Expense Ratio Comparison

JAPN has a 0.85% expense ratio, which is higher than CLIP's 0.07% expense ratio.

Dividends

JAPN vs. CLIP - Dividend Comparison

JAPN's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.28%, less than CLIP's 3.91% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023
CLIP Global X 1-3 Month T-Bill ETF	3.91%	4.14%	5.11%	2.75%
JAPN Horizon Kinetics Japan Owner Operator ETF	0.28%	0.24%	0.00%	0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both JAPN and CLIP in my portfolio?

JAPN and CLIP have a correlation of -0.13, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, JAPN or CLIP?

JAPN has higher volatility (4.33%) compared to CLIP (0.06%). In terms of maximum drawdown, JAPN dropped -23.94% vs CLIP's -0.08%.

Which ETF is better, JAPN or CLIP?

On 1-year performance, CLIP leads with 3.96% vs -16.72% for JAPN. On fees, CLIP is cheaper at 0.07% per year. On volatility, CLIP has been the lower-risk option at 0.06%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, JAPN or CLIP?

Over the 1-year period, CLIP has performed better with a 3.96% return vs -16.72%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, JAPN or CLIP?

CLIP is cheaper with a 0.07% expense ratio, compared with 0.85% for JAPN.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, JAPN or CLIP?

CLIP has the higher dividend yield at 3.91%, compared with 0.28% for JAPN.

What is the main difference between JAPN and CLIP?

JAPN is categorized as Japan Equities, while CLIP is Ultrashort Bond. They also come from different issuers: Horizon and Global X. Their fees differ too: 0.85% for JAPN and 0.07% for CLIP.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

CLIP currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (17.26 vs -0.90), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.