JAPN vs. BCDF
JAPN (Horizon Kinetics Japan Owner Operator ETF) and BCDF (Horizon Kinetics Blockchain Development ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - JAPN is a Japan Equities fund actively managed by Horizon, while BCDF is a Cryptocurrency fund actively managed by Horizon. Both are actively managed. Over the past year, JAPN returned -16.72% vs 6.26% for BCDF. At a 0.33 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. Both charge a 0.85% expense ratio.
Performance
JAPN vs. BCDF - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, JAPN achieves a -13.33% return, which is significantly lower than BCDF's 3.23% return.
JAPN
- 1D
- -1.75%
- 1M
- -2.99%
- YTD
- -13.33%
- 6M
- -13.01%
- 1Y
- -16.72%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
BCDF
- 1D
- -0.16%
- 1M
- -4.70%
- YTD
- 3.23%
- 6M
- 4.02%
- 1Y
- 6.26%
- 3Y*
- 14.97%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
JAPN vs. BCDF - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
JAPN Horizon Kinetics Japan Owner Operator ETF | -13.33% | 2.80% |
BCDF Horizon Kinetics Blockchain Development ETF | 3.23% | 2.80% |
Correlation
The correlation between JAPN and BCDF is 0.33, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.33 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since May 14, 2025 | 0.33 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
JAPN vs. BCDF — Risk / Return Rank
JAPN
BCDF
JAPN vs. BCDF - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Horizon Kinetics Japan Owner Operator ETF (JAPN) and Horizon Kinetics Blockchain Development ETF (BCDF). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| JAPN | BCDF | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -1.32 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -1.88 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 0.86 | 1.08 | -0.22 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.70 | 0.82 | -1.52 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -1.34 | 1.85 | -3.19 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| JAPN | BCDF | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -0.90 | 0.43 | -1.32 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | -0.54 | 0.39 | -0.93 |
Drawdowns
JAPN vs. BCDF - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum JAPN drawdown since its inception was -23.94%, smaller than the maximum BCDF drawdown of -27.70%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for JAPN and BCDF.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| JAPN | BCDF | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -23.94% | -27.70% | +3.76% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -23.94% | -7.63% | -16.31% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | — | -13.46% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -22.90% | -7.63% | -15.27% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -9.47% | -9.83% | +0.36% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 12.54% | 3.39% | +9.15% |
Volatility
JAPN vs. BCDF - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Horizon Kinetics Japan Owner Operator ETF (JAPN) is 4.33%, while Horizon Kinetics Blockchain Development ETF (BCDF) has a volatility of 5.17%. This indicates that JAPN experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than BCDF based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| JAPN | BCDF | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 4.33% | 5.17% | -0.84% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 15.41% | 11.03% | +4.38% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 18.77% | 14.76% | +4.01% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 19.24% | 16.94% | +2.30% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 19.24% | 16.94% | +2.30% |
JAPN vs. BCDF - Expense Ratio Comparison
Both JAPN and BCDF have an expense ratio of 0.85%.
Dividends
JAPN vs. BCDF - Dividend Comparison
JAPN's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.28%, less than BCDF's 2.45% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
BCDF Horizon Kinetics Blockchain Development ETF | 2.45% | 2.53% | 1.63% | 0.69% | 0.38% |
JAPN Horizon Kinetics Japan Owner Operator ETF | 0.28% | 0.24% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
JAPN and BCDF have a correlation of 0.33, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
BCDF has higher volatility (5.17%) compared to JAPN (4.33%). In terms of maximum drawdown, JAPN dropped -23.94% vs BCDF's -27.70%.
On 1-year performance, BCDF leads with 6.26% vs -16.72% for JAPN. Both ETFs have the same 0.85% expense ratio. On volatility, JAPN has been the lower-risk option at 4.33%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 1-year period, BCDF has performed better with a 6.26% return vs -16.72%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
JAPN and BCDF have the same expense ratio: 0.85% per year.
BCDF has the higher dividend yield at 2.45%, compared with 0.28% for JAPN.
JAPN is categorized as Japan Equities, while BCDF is Cryptocurrency.
BCDF currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.43 vs -0.90), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for JAPN and BCDF
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer