JANZ vs. PMAU

Last updated Jun 4, 2026

JANZ (TrueShares Structured Outcome (January) ETF) and PMAU (PGIM S&P 500 Max Buffer ETF - August) are both Defined Outcome funds. Both are actively managed. Their correlation of 0.91 suggests significant overlap in exposure. JANZ charges 0.79%/yr vs 0.50%/yr for PMAU.

Performance

JANZ vs. PMAU - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in TrueShares Structured Outcome (January) ETF (JANZ) and PGIM S&P 500 Max Buffer ETF - August (PMAU). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, JANZ achieves a 8.24% return, which is significantly higher than PMAU's 2.95% return.

JANZ

• 1D: -0.55%
• 1M: 4.16%
• YTD: 8.24%
• 6M: 7.97%
• 1Y: 20.42%
• 3Y*: 16.17%
• 5Y*: 10.70%
• 10Y*: —

PMAU

• 1D: -0.02%
• 1M: 0.89%
• YTD: 2.95%
• 6M: 3.43%
• 1Y: —
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

JANZ vs. PMAU - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025
JANZ TrueShares Structured Outcome (January) ETF	8.24%	7.67%
PMAU PGIM S&P 500 Max Buffer ETF - August	2.95%	2.98%

Correlation

The correlation between JANZ and PMAU is 0.91, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.

	Correlation
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Aug 4, 2025	0.91

Return for Risk

JANZ vs. PMAU — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

JANZ

JANZ Risk / Return Rank: 66
JANZ Sharpe Ratio Rank: 66
JANZ Sortino Ratio Rank: 67
JANZ Omega Ratio Rank: 65
JANZ Calmar Ratio Rank: 61
JANZ Martin Ratio Rank: 72

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

JANZ vs. PMAU - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for TrueShares Structured Outcome (January) ETF (JANZ) and PGIM S&P 500 Max Buffer ETF - August (PMAU). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	JANZ	PMAU	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	2.18	—	—
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	3.04	—	—
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.39	—	—
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	3.00	—	—
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	13.29	—	—
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	JANZ	PMAU	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	2.18	—	—
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.82	—	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.93	2.90	-1.97

Drawdowns

JANZ vs. PMAU - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum JANZ drawdown since its inception was -18.11%, which is greater than PMAU's maximum drawdown of -1.79%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for JANZ and PMAU.

Drawdown Indicators

	JANZ	PMAU	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-18.11%	-1.79%	-16.32%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-6.83%	—	—
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-14.33%	—	—
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-18.11%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-0.55%	-0.02%	-0.53%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-3.49%	-0.17%	-3.32%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	1.54%	—	—

Volatility

Volatility by Period

	JANZ	PMAU	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	2.44%	—	—
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	7.10%	—	—
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	9.42%	2.51%	+6.91%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	13.14%	2.51%	+10.63%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	12.97%	2.51%	+10.46%

JANZ vs. PMAU - Expense Ratio Comparison

JANZ has a 0.79% expense ratio, which is higher than PMAU's 0.50% expense ratio.

Dividends

JANZ vs. PMAU - Dividend Comparison

JANZ's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.31%, while PMAU has not paid dividends to shareholders.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021
JANZ TrueShares Structured Outcome (January) ETF	1.31%	1.42%	2.70%	2.58%	0.21%	4.52%
PMAU PGIM S&P 500 Max Buffer ETF - August	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both JANZ and PMAU in my portfolio?

With a correlation of 0.91, JANZ and PMAU move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

Which ETF is better, JANZ or PMAU?

On fees, PMAU is cheaper at 0.50% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF is cheaper, JANZ or PMAU?

PMAU is cheaper with a 0.50% expense ratio, compared with 0.79% for JANZ.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, JANZ or PMAU?

JANZ has the higher dividend yield at 1.31%, compared with 0.00% for PMAU.

What is the main difference between JANZ and PMAU?

They also come from different issuers: TrueShares and PGIM. Their fees differ too: 0.79% for JANZ and 0.50% for PMAU.