JANZ vs. PMAU
JANZ (TrueShares Structured Outcome (January) ETF) and PMAU (PGIM S&P 500 Max Buffer ETF - August) are both Defined Outcome funds. Both are actively managed. Over the past year, JANZ returned 15.58% vs 7.00% for PMAU. Their correlation of 0.86 means they have usually moved in the same direction. JANZ charges 0.79%/yr vs 0.50%/yr for PMAU.
Performance
JANZ vs. PMAU - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, JANZ achieves a 7.35% return, which is significantly higher than PMAU's 3.90% return.
JANZ
- 1D
- 0.71%
- 1M
- 0.20%
- 6M
- 6.49%
- YTD
- 7.35%
- 1Y
- 15.58%
- 3Y*
- 13.92%
- 5Y*
- 9.89%
- 10Y*
- —
- ALL TIME*
- 11.44%
PMAU
- 1D
- 0.09%
- 1M
- 0.49%
- 6M
- 3.48%
- YTD
- 3.90%
- 1Y
- 7.00%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
- ALL TIME*
- —
Liquidity Comparison
| Position | Avg. Volume Value (2W) | Avg. Volume Value (1M) | Avg. Volume Value (3M) |
|---|---|---|---|
| $139.93K | $79.26K | $602.93K | |
| $48.78K | $23.35K | $8.53K |
JANZ vs. PMAU - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
JANZ TrueShares Structured Outcome (January) ETF | 7.35% | 6.38% |
PMAU PGIM S&P 500 Max Buffer ETF - August | 3.90% | 2.94% |
Correlation
The correlation between JANZ and PMAU is 0.86, meaning they have usually moved in the same direction, including during past declines.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Aug 1, 2025 | 0.86 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
JANZ vs. PMAU — Risk / Return Rank
JANZ
PMAU
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
JANZ vs. PMAU - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for TrueShares Structured Outcome (January) ETF (JANZ) and PGIM S&P 500 Max Buffer ETF - August (PMAU). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| JANZ | PMAU | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | — | — | |
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | — | — | |
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.24 | — | — |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.09 | — | — |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 8.30 | — | — |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
JANZ vs. PMAU - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum JANZ drawdown since its inception was -18.11%, which is greater than PMAU's maximum drawdown of -1.79%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for JANZ and PMAU.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| JANZ | PMAU | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -18.11% | -1.79% | -16.32% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -6.83% | -1.79% | -5.04% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -14.33% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -18.11% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -1.37% | 0.00% | -1.37% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -3.44% | -0.15% | -3.29% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 1.72% | — | — |
Volatility
JANZ vs. PMAU - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| JANZ | PMAU | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 2.97% | — | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 8.21% | — | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 10.45% | 2.35% | +8.10% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 13.26% | 2.35% | +10.91% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 12.97% | 2.35% | +10.62% |
JANZ vs. PMAU - Expense Ratio Comparison
JANZ has a 0.79% expense ratio, which is higher than PMAU's 0.50% expense ratio.
Dividends
JANZ vs. PMAU - Dividend Comparison
JANZ's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.32%, while PMAU has not paid dividends to shareholders.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
JANZ TrueShares Structured Outcome (January) ETF | 1.32% | 1.42% | 2.70% | 2.58% | 0.21% | 4.52% |
PMAU PGIM S&P 500 Max Buffer ETF - August | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
JANZ and PMAU have a correlation of 0.86, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On 1-year performance, JANZ leads with 15.58% vs 7.00% for PMAU. On fees, PMAU is cheaper at 0.50% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 1-year period, JANZ has performed better with a 15.58% return vs 7.00%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
PMAU is cheaper with a 0.50% expense ratio, compared with 0.79% for JANZ.
JANZ has the higher dividend yield at 1.32%, compared with 0.00% for PMAU.
They also come from different issuers: TrueShares and PGIM. Their fees differ too: 0.79% for JANZ and 0.50% for PMAU.
Find the right allocation for JANZ and PMAU
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer