PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
JANZ vs. ONEZ
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

JANZ vs. ONEZ - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in TrueShares Structured Outcome (January) ETF (JANZ) and TrueShares Seasonality Laddered Buffered ETF (ONEZ). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, JANZ achieves a 7.59% return, which is significantly higher than ONEZ's 6.59% return.


JANZ

1D
-0.68%
1M
0.89%
6M
6.02%
YTD
7.59%
1Y
15.56%
3Y*
14.54%
5Y*
10.02%
10Y*

ONEZ

1D
-0.36%
1M
0.71%
6M
5.17%
YTD
6.59%
1Y
13.27%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

JANZ vs. ONEZ - Yearly Performance Comparison


Correlation

The correlation between JANZ and ONEZ is 0.91, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.91

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 27, 2025

0.90

The correlation between JANZ and ONEZ has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.90 to 0.91 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

JANZ vs. ONEZ — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

JANZ
JANZ Risk / Return Rank: 5858
Overall Rank
JANZ Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5757
Sharpe Ratio Rank
JANZ Sortino Ratio Rank: 5656
Sortino Ratio Rank
JANZ Omega Ratio Rank: 5555
Omega Ratio Rank
JANZ Calmar Ratio Rank: 5858
Calmar Ratio Rank
JANZ Martin Ratio Rank: 6666
Martin Ratio Rank

ONEZ
ONEZ Risk / Return Rank: 5151
Overall Rank
ONEZ Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5151
Sharpe Ratio Rank
ONEZ Sortino Ratio Rank: 5151
Sortino Ratio Rank
ONEZ Omega Ratio Rank: 4747
Omega Ratio Rank
ONEZ Calmar Ratio Rank: 5050
Calmar Ratio Rank
ONEZ Martin Ratio Rank: 5757
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

JANZ vs. ONEZ - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for TrueShares Structured Outcome (January) ETF (JANZ) and TrueShares Seasonality Laddered Buffered ETF (ONEZ). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


JANZONEZDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.14

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.15

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.27

1.25

+0.03

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.29

2.02

+0.27

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

9.38

7.87

+1.51

JANZ vs. ONEZ - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current JANZ Sharpe Ratio is 1.54, which is comparable to the ONEZ Sharpe Ratio of 1.40. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of JANZ and ONEZ, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

JANZ vs. ONEZ - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum JANZ drawdown since its inception was -18.11%, which is greater than ONEZ's maximum drawdown of -13.24%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for JANZ and ONEZ.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


JANZONEZDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-18.11%

-13.24%

-4.87%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-6.83%

-6.60%

-0.23%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-14.33%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-18.11%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-1.15%

-1.25%

+0.10%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-3.45%

-2.05%

-1.40%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.66%

1.69%

-0.03%

Volatility

JANZ vs. ONEZ - Volatility Comparison

TrueShares Structured Outcome (January) ETF (JANZ) has a higher volatility of 3.71% compared to TrueShares Seasonality Laddered Buffered ETF (ONEZ) at 2.86%. This indicates that JANZ's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than ONEZ based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


JANZONEZDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.71%

2.86%

+0.85%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

8.11%

7.56%

+0.55%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

10.19%

9.54%

+0.65%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

13.26%

11.81%

+1.45%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

12.99%

11.81%

+1.18%

JANZ vs. ONEZ - Expense Ratio Comparison

JANZ has a 0.79% expense ratio, which is lower than ONEZ's 0.98% expense ratio.


Dividends

JANZ vs. ONEZ - Dividend Comparison

JANZ's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.32%, less than ONEZ's 3.72% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021
JANZ
TrueShares Structured Outcome (January) ETF
1.32%1.42%2.70%2.58%0.21%4.52%
ONEZ
TrueShares Seasonality Laddered Buffered ETF
3.72%3.97%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


With a correlation of 0.91, JANZ and ONEZ move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

JANZ has higher volatility (3.71%) compared to ONEZ (2.86%). In terms of maximum drawdown, JANZ dropped -18.11% vs ONEZ's -13.24%.

On 1-year performance, JANZ leads with 15.56% vs 13.27% for ONEZ. On fees, JANZ is cheaper at 0.79% per year. On volatility, ONEZ has been the lower-risk option at 2.86%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 1-year period, JANZ has performed better with a 15.56% return vs 13.27%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

JANZ is cheaper with a 0.79% expense ratio, compared with 0.98% for ONEZ.

ONEZ has the higher dividend yield at 3.72%, compared with 1.32% for JANZ.

Their fees differ too: 0.79% for JANZ and 0.98% for ONEZ.

JANZ currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.54 vs 1.40), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for JANZ and ONEZ

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer