JANZ vs. FMAR
Compare and contrast key facts about TrueShares Structured Outcome (January) ETF (JANZ) and FT Vest U.S. Equity Buffer ETF - March (FMAR).
JANZ and FMAR are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. JANZ is an actively managed fund by TrueShares. It was launched on Dec 31, 2020. FMAR is an actively managed fund by FT Vest. It was launched on Mar 19, 2021.
Performance
JANZ vs. FMAR - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
JANZ vs. FMAR - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
JANZ TrueShares Structured Outcome (January) ETF | -3.53% | 12.47% | 18.10% | 19.09% | -11.43% | 15.85% |
FMAR FT Vest U.S. Equity Buffer ETF - March | 2.16% | 9.69% | 14.61% | 20.39% | -5.51% | 11.38% |
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, JANZ achieves a -3.53% return, which is significantly lower than FMAR's 2.16% return.
JANZ
- 1D
- 2.03%
- 1M
- -3.67%
- YTD
- -3.53%
- 6M
- -1.79%
- 1Y
- 12.03%
- 3Y*
- 13.03%
- 5Y*
- 9.05%
- 10Y*
- —
FMAR
- 1D
- 1.89%
- 1M
- 0.92%
- YTD
- 2.16%
- 6M
- 4.53%
- 1Y
- 14.91%
- 3Y*
- 12.98%
- 5Y*
- 9.89%
- 10Y*
- —
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
JANZ vs. FMAR - Expense Ratio Comparison
JANZ has a 0.79% expense ratio, which is lower than FMAR's 0.85% expense ratio.
Return for Risk
JANZ vs. FMAR — Risk / Return Rank
JANZ
FMAR
JANZ vs. FMAR - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for TrueShares Structured Outcome (January) ETF (JANZ) and FT Vest U.S. Equity Buffer ETF - March (FMAR). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| JANZ | FMAR | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 0.86 | 1.36 | -0.50 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 1.33 | 1.99 | -0.66 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.19 | 1.43 | -0.23 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.35 | 1.84 | -0.49 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 6.37 | 11.70 | -5.33 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| JANZ | FMAR | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.86 | 1.36 | -0.50 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.69 | 0.95 | -0.26 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.76 | 0.98 | -0.21 |
Correlation
The correlation between JANZ and FMAR is 0.94, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.
Dividends
JANZ vs. FMAR - Dividend Comparison
JANZ's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.47%, while FMAR has not paid dividends to shareholders.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
JANZ TrueShares Structured Outcome (January) ETF | 1.47% | 1.42% | 2.70% | 2.58% | 0.21% | 4.52% |
FMAR FT Vest U.S. Equity Buffer ETF - March | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Drawdowns
JANZ vs. FMAR - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum JANZ drawdown since its inception was -18.11%, which is greater than FMAR's maximum drawdown of -14.36%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for JANZ and FMAR.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| JANZ | FMAR | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -18.11% | -14.36% | -3.75% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -9.28% | -8.31% | -0.97% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -18.11% | -14.36% | -3.75% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -4.94% | -0.49% | -4.45% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -3.58% | -2.21% | -1.37% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 1.97% | 1.30% | +0.67% |
Volatility
JANZ vs. FMAR - Volatility Comparison
TrueShares Structured Outcome (January) ETF (JANZ) has a higher volatility of 4.06% compared to FT Vest U.S. Equity Buffer ETF - March (FMAR) at 2.90%. This indicates that JANZ's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than FMAR based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| JANZ | FMAR | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 4.06% | 2.90% | +1.16% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 7.56% | 3.75% | +3.81% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 14.04% | 11.04% | +3.00% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 13.15% | 10.49% | +2.66% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 13.09% | 10.47% | +2.62% |