FMAR vs. FOCT

Last updated Jun 23, 2026

FMAR (FT Vest U.S. Equity Buffer ETF - March) and FOCT (FT Vest U.S. Equity Buffer ETF - October) are both Defined Outcome funds from FT Vest. Both are actively managed. Over the past 5 years, FMAR returned 10.59%/yr vs 9.04%/yr for FOCT. Their correlation of 0.91 suggests significant overlap in exposure. Both charge a 0.85% expense ratio.

Performance

FMAR vs. FOCT - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in FT Vest U.S. Equity Buffer ETF - March (FMAR) and FT Vest U.S. Equity Buffer ETF - October (FOCT). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, FMAR achieves a 9.87% return, which is significantly higher than FOCT's 6.45% return.

FMAR

• 1D: -0.12%
• 1M: 0.36%
• YTD: 9.87%
• 6M: 10.00%
• 1Y: 18.79%
• 3Y*: 14.03%
• 5Y*: 10.59%
• 10Y*: —

FOCT

• 1D: -0.15%
• 1M: 0.56%
• YTD: 6.45%
• 6M: 6.34%
• 1Y: 19.91%
• 3Y*: 12.14%
• 5Y*: 9.04%
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

FMAR vs. FOCT - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021
FMAR FT Vest U.S. Equity Buffer ETF - March	9.87%	9.69%	14.61%	20.39%	-5.51%	11.71%
FOCT FT Vest U.S. Equity Buffer ETF - October	6.45%	14.92%	9.62%	17.81%	-7.59%	10.32%

Correlation

The correlation between FMAR and FOCT is 0.90, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.90
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.87
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.91
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 22, 2021	0.91

The correlation between FMAR and FOCT has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.87 to 0.91 - a consistent structural relationship.

FMAR vs. FOCT - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	FMAR	FOCT
Technology	39.0%	39.0%
Financial Services	11.1%	11.1%
Communication Services	10.6%	10.6%
Consumer Cyclical	9.9%	9.9%
Healthcare	8.3%	8.3%
Industrials	7.8%	7.8%
Consumer Defensive	4.5%	4.5%
Energy	3.1%	3.1%
Utilities	2.1%	2.1%
Real Estate	1.8%	1.8%
Basic Materials	1.7%	1.7%

Return for Risk

FMAR vs. FOCT — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

FMAR

FMAR Risk / Return Rank: 96
FMAR Sharpe Ratio Rank: 95
FMAR Sortino Ratio Rank: 97
FMAR Omega Ratio Rank: 97
FMAR Calmar Ratio Rank: 96
FMAR Martin Ratio Rank: 98

FOCT

FOCT Risk / Return Rank: 81
FOCT Sharpe Ratio Rank: 81
FOCT Sortino Ratio Rank: 84
FOCT Omega Ratio Rank: 84
FOCT Calmar Ratio Rank: 71
FOCT Martin Ratio Rank: 85

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

FMAR vs. FOCT - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for FT Vest U.S. Equity Buffer ETF - March (FMAR) and FT Vest U.S. Equity Buffer ETF - October (FOCT). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	FMAR	FOCT	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	3.68	2.49	+1.19
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	5.87	3.57	+2.31
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.91	1.48	+0.43
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	8.00	3.48	+4.51
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	50.46	16.95	+33.51

FMAR vs. FOCT - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current FMAR Sharpe Ratio is 3.68, which is higher than the FOCT Sharpe Ratio of 2.49. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FMAR and FOCT, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

FMAR vs. FOCT - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FMAR drawdown since its inception was -14.36%, roughly equal to the maximum FOCT drawdown of -14.07%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FMAR and FOCT.

Drawdown Indicators

	FMAR	FOCT	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-14.36%	-14.07%	-0.29%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-2.36%	-5.74%	+3.38%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-12.37%	-13.06%	+0.69%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-14.36%	-14.07%	-0.29%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-0.34%	-0.41%	+0.07%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-2.12%	-2.24%	+0.12%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	0.37%	1.18%	-0.81%

Volatility

FMAR vs. FOCT - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for FT Vest U.S. Equity Buffer ETF - March (FMAR) is 1.70%, while FT Vest U.S. Equity Buffer ETF - October (FOCT) has a volatility of 2.10%. This indicates that FMAR experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than FOCT based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	FMAR	FOCT	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	1.70%	2.10%	-0.40%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	4.24%	6.17%	-1.93%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	5.14%	8.05%	-2.91%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	10.46%	11.11%	-0.65%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	10.32%	10.88%	-0.56%

FMAR vs. FOCT - Expense Ratio Comparison

Both FMAR and FOCT have an expense ratio of 0.85%.

Dividends

FMAR vs. FOCT - Dividend Comparison

Neither FMAR nor FOCT has paid dividends to shareholders.

Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both FMAR and FOCT in my portfolio?

FMAR and FOCT have a correlation of 0.90, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, FMAR or FOCT?

FOCT has higher volatility (2.10%) compared to FMAR (1.70%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FMAR dropped -14.36% vs FOCT's -14.07%.

Which ETF is better, FMAR or FOCT?

On 5-year performance, FMAR leads with 10.59% vs 9.04% for FOCT. Both ETFs have the same 0.85% expense ratio. On volatility, FMAR has been the lower-risk option at 1.70%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, FMAR or FOCT?

Over the 5-year period, FMAR has performed better with a 10.59% return vs 9.04%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, FMAR or FOCT?

FMAR and FOCT have the same expense ratio: 0.85% per year.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, FMAR or FOCT?

FMAR and FOCT have nearly identical dividend yields, around 0.00%.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

FMAR currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (3.68 vs 2.49), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.