JANW vs. ARLU
JANW (AllianzIM U.S. Large Cap Buffer20 Jan ETF) and ARLU (Allianzim U.S. Equity Buffer15 Uncapped Apr ETF) are both Options Trading funds from Allianz. Both are actively managed. Over the past year, JANW returned 13.20% vs 20.65% for ARLU. Their correlation of 0.90 suggests significant overlap in exposure. Both charge a 0.74% expense ratio.
Performance
JANW vs. ARLU - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, JANW achieves a 4.51% return, which is significantly lower than ARLU's 6.98% return.
JANW
- 1D
- 0.08%
- 1M
- 1.55%
- YTD
- 4.51%
- 6M
- 5.31%
- 1Y
- 13.20%
- 3Y*
- 10.98%
- 5Y*
- 8.29%
- 10Y*
- —
ARLU
- 1D
- 0.16%
- 1M
- 4.51%
- YTD
- 6.98%
- 6M
- 7.15%
- 1Y
- 20.65%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
JANW vs. ARLU - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | |
|---|---|---|---|
JANW AllianzIM U.S. Large Cap Buffer20 Jan ETF | 4.51% | 10.05% | 7.20% |
ARLU Allianzim U.S. Equity Buffer15 Uncapped Apr ETF | 6.98% | 11.27% | 9.00% |
Correlation
The correlation between JANW and ARLU is 0.91, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.91 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 2, 2024 | 0.90 |
The correlation between JANW and ARLU has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.90 to 0.91 - a consistent structural relationship.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
JANW vs. ARLU — Risk / Return Rank
JANW
ARLU
JANW vs. ARLU - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for AllianzIM U.S. Large Cap Buffer20 Jan ETF (JANW) and Allianzim U.S. Equity Buffer15 Uncapped Apr ETF (ARLU). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| JANW | ARLU | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 2.89 | 1.87 | +1.02 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 4.35 | 2.54 | +1.81 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.64 | 1.34 | +0.30 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 3.70 | 2.16 | +1.54 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 20.47 | 9.69 | +10.78 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| JANW | ARLU | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.89 | 1.87 | +1.02 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 1.23 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 1.28 | 1.02 | +0.26 |
Drawdowns
JANW vs. ARLU - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum JANW drawdown since its inception was -9.69%, smaller than the maximum ARLU drawdown of -15.38%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for JANW and ARLU.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| JANW | ARLU | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -9.69% | -15.38% | +5.69% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -3.65% | -9.66% | +6.01% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -8.66% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -9.69% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -1.23% | -2.23% | +1.00% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 0.66% | 2.15% | -1.49% |
Volatility
JANW vs. ARLU - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for AllianzIM U.S. Large Cap Buffer20 Jan ETF (JANW) is 0.81%, while Allianzim U.S. Equity Buffer15 Uncapped Apr ETF (ARLU) has a volatility of 2.64%. This indicates that JANW experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than ARLU based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| JANW | ARLU | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 0.81% | 2.64% | -1.83% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 3.66% | 8.72% | -5.06% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 4.60% | 11.12% | -6.52% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 6.77% | 12.57% | -5.80% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 6.67% | 12.57% | -5.90% |
JANW vs. ARLU - Expense Ratio Comparison
Both JANW and ARLU have an expense ratio of 0.74%.
Dividends
JANW vs. ARLU - Dividend Comparison
Neither JANW nor ARLU has paid dividends to shareholders.
Frequently Asked Questions
With a correlation of 0.91, JANW and ARLU move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.
ARLU has higher volatility (2.64%) compared to JANW (0.81%). In terms of maximum drawdown, JANW dropped -9.69% vs ARLU's -15.38%.
On 1-year performance, ARLU leads with 20.65% vs 13.20% for JANW. Both ETFs have the same 0.74% expense ratio. On volatility, JANW has been the lower-risk option at 0.81%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 1-year period, ARLU has performed better with a 20.65% return vs 13.20%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
JANW and ARLU have the same expense ratio: 0.74% per year.
JANW and ARLU have nearly identical dividend yields, around 0.00%.
JANW currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.89 vs 1.87), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for JANW and ARLU
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer