PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
JANW vs. ARLU
Performance
Return for Risk
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility

Performance

JANW vs. ARLU - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in AllianzIM U.S. Large Cap Buffer20 Jan ETF (JANW) and Allianzim U.S. Equity Buffer15 Uncapped Apr ETF (ARLU). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading graphics...

JANW vs. ARLU - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024
JANW
AllianzIM U.S. Large Cap Buffer20 Jan ETF
-1.43%10.05%7.20%
ARLU
Allianzim U.S. Equity Buffer15 Uncapped Apr ETF
-5.35%11.27%9.00%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, JANW achieves a -1.43% return, which is significantly higher than ARLU's -5.35% return.


JANW

1D
1.42%
1M
-1.88%
YTD
-1.43%
6M
0.94%
1Y
9.85%
3Y*
9.76%
5Y*
7.29%
10Y*

ARLU

1D
2.91%
1M
-5.47%
YTD
-5.35%
6M
-3.66%
1Y
11.19%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


JANW vs. ARLU - Expense Ratio Comparison

Both JANW and ARLU have an expense ratio of 0.74%.


Return for Risk

JANW vs. ARLU — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

JANW
JANW Risk / Return Rank: 7373
Overall Rank
JANW Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6868
Sharpe Ratio Rank
JANW Sortino Ratio Rank: 7171
Sortino Ratio Rank
JANW Omega Ratio Rank: 8181
Omega Ratio Rank
JANW Calmar Ratio Rank: 6363
Calmar Ratio Rank
JANW Martin Ratio Rank: 8282
Martin Ratio Rank

ARLU
ARLU Risk / Return Rank: 4545
Overall Rank
ARLU Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4242
Sharpe Ratio Rank
ARLU Sortino Ratio Rank: 4242
Sortino Ratio Rank
ARLU Omega Ratio Rank: 4141
Omega Ratio Rank
ARLU Calmar Ratio Rank: 4646
Calmar Ratio Rank
ARLU Martin Ratio Rank: 5454
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

JANW vs. ARLU - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for AllianzIM U.S. Large Cap Buffer20 Jan ETF (JANW) and Allianzim U.S. Equity Buffer15 Uncapped Apr ETF (ARLU). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


JANWARLUDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

1.22

0.80

+0.42

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

1.84

1.21

+0.62

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.32

1.17

+0.15

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

1.64

1.23

+0.42

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

9.43

5.35

+4.07

JANW vs. ARLU - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current JANW Sharpe Ratio is 1.22, which is higher than the ARLU Sharpe Ratio of 0.80. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of JANW and ARLU, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Loading graphics...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


JANWARLUDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.22

0.80

+0.42

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

1.08

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

1.13

0.56

+0.57

Correlation

The correlation between JANW and ARLU is 0.89, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.


Dividends

JANW vs. ARLU - Dividend Comparison

Neither JANW nor ARLU has paid dividends to shareholders.


Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Drawdowns

JANW vs. ARLU - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum JANW drawdown since its inception was -9.69%, smaller than the maximum ARLU drawdown of -15.38%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for JANW and ARLU.


Loading graphics...

Drawdown Indicators


JANWARLUDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-9.69%

-15.38%

+5.69%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-6.18%

-9.66%

+3.48%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-9.69%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-2.28%

-7.04%

+4.76%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-1.26%

-2.30%

+1.04%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.08%

2.21%

-1.13%

Volatility

JANW vs. ARLU - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for AllianzIM U.S. Large Cap Buffer20 Jan ETF (JANW) is 2.64%, while Allianzim U.S. Equity Buffer15 Uncapped Apr ETF (ARLU) has a volatility of 5.40%. This indicates that JANW experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than ARLU based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading graphics...

Volatility by Period


JANWARLUDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

2.64%

5.40%

-2.76%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

3.63%

9.38%

-5.75%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

8.11%

13.99%

-5.88%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

6.77%

12.79%

-6.02%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

6.73%

12.79%

-6.06%