PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
JANW vs. AJAN
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

JANW vs. AJAN - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in AllianzIM U.S. Large Cap Buffer20 Jan ETF (JANW) and Innovator Equity Defined Protection ETF - 2 Yr To January 2026 (AJAN). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, JANW achieves a 3.90% return, which is significantly higher than AJAN's 1.63% return.


JANW

1D
-0.35%
1M
-0.01%
YTD
3.90%
6M
4.02%
1Y
11.63%
3Y*
10.35%
5Y*
7.97%
10Y*

AJAN

1D
-0.17%
1M
-0.12%
YTD
1.63%
6M
1.72%
1Y
5.20%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

JANW vs. AJAN - Yearly Performance Comparison


Correlation

The correlation between JANW and AJAN is 0.73, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.73

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 2, 2024

0.76

The correlation between JANW and AJAN has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.73 to 0.76 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

JANW vs. AJAN — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

JANW
JANW Risk / Return Rank: 8484
Overall Rank
JANW Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8484
Sharpe Ratio Rank
JANW Sortino Ratio Rank: 8888
Sortino Ratio Rank
JANW Omega Ratio Rank: 9090
Omega Ratio Rank
JANW Calmar Ratio Rank: 6969
Calmar Ratio Rank
JANW Martin Ratio Rank: 8787
Martin Ratio Rank

AJAN
AJAN Risk / Return Rank: 7070
Overall Rank
AJAN Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7171
Sharpe Ratio Rank
AJAN Sortino Ratio Rank: 7979
Sortino Ratio Rank
AJAN Omega Ratio Rank: 8383
Omega Ratio Rank
AJAN Calmar Ratio Rank: 5151
Calmar Ratio Rank
AJAN Martin Ratio Rank: 6767
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

JANW vs. AJAN - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for AllianzIM U.S. Large Cap Buffer20 Jan ETF (JANW) and Innovator Equity Defined Protection ETF - 2 Yr To January 2026 (AJAN). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


JANWAJANDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.39

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.49

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.53

1.46

+0.07

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

3.20

2.33

+0.87

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

17.37

11.47

+5.90

JANW vs. AJAN - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current JANW Sharpe Ratio is 2.50, which is comparable to the AJAN Sharpe Ratio of 2.11. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of JANW and AJAN, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

JANW vs. AJAN - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum JANW drawdown since its inception was -9.69%, which is greater than AJAN's maximum drawdown of -4.11%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for JANW and AJAN.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


JANWAJANDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-9.69%

-4.11%

-5.58%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-3.65%

-2.24%

-1.41%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-8.66%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-9.69%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.63%

-0.49%

-0.14%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-1.22%

-0.30%

-0.92%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

0.67%

0.45%

+0.22%

Volatility

JANW vs. AJAN - Volatility Comparison

AllianzIM U.S. Large Cap Buffer20 Jan ETF (JANW) has a higher volatility of 1.48% compared to Innovator Equity Defined Protection ETF - 2 Yr To January 2026 (AJAN) at 1.11%. This indicates that JANW's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than AJAN based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


JANWAJANDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

1.48%

1.11%

+0.37%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

3.91%

2.29%

+1.62%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

4.69%

2.48%

+2.21%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

6.80%

3.82%

+2.98%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

6.67%

3.82%

+2.85%

JANW vs. AJAN - Expense Ratio Comparison

JANW has a 0.74% expense ratio, which is lower than AJAN's 0.79% expense ratio.


Dividends

JANW vs. AJAN - Dividend Comparison

Neither JANW nor AJAN has paid dividends to shareholders.


Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Frequently Asked Questions


JANW and AJAN have a correlation of 0.73, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

JANW has higher volatility (1.48%) compared to AJAN (1.11%). In terms of maximum drawdown, JANW dropped -9.69% vs AJAN's -4.11%.

On 1-year performance, JANW leads with 11.63% vs 5.20% for AJAN. On fees, JANW is cheaper at 0.74% per year. On volatility, AJAN has been the lower-risk option at 1.11%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 1-year period, JANW has performed better with a 11.63% return vs 5.20%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

JANW is cheaper with a 0.74% expense ratio, compared with 0.79% for AJAN.

JANW and AJAN have nearly identical dividend yields, around 0.00%.

They also come from different issuers: Allianz and Innovator. Their fees differ too: 0.74% for JANW and 0.79% for AJAN.

JANW currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.50 vs 2.11), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for JANW and AJAN

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer