JANU vs. RSBY

Last updated Jul 11, 2026

JANU (AllianzIM U.S. Equity Buffer15 Uncapped Jan ETF) and RSBY (Return Stacked Bonds & Futures Yield ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - JANU is a Defined Outcome fund actively managed by AllianzIM, while RSBY is a Multistrategy fund actively managed by Return Stacked. Both are actively managed. Over the past year, JANU returned 16.00% vs 17.35% for RSBY. At a correlation of -0.19, they often move in opposite directions. JANU charges 0.74%/yr vs 0.98%/yr for RSBY.

Performance

JANU vs. RSBY - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in AllianzIM U.S. Equity Buffer15 Uncapped Jan ETF (JANU) and Return Stacked Bonds & Futures Yield ETF (RSBY). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, JANU achieves a 7.84% return, which is significantly lower than RSBY's 18.52% return.

JANU

• 1D: 0.46%
• 1M: 1.38%
• 6M: 6.40%
• YTD: 7.84%
• 1Y: 16.00%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

RSBY

• 1D: -0.60%
• 1M: -0.71%
• 6M: 17.92%
• YTD: 18.52%
• 1Y: 17.35%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

JANU vs. RSBY - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025
JANU AllianzIM U.S. Equity Buffer15 Uncapped Jan ETF	7.84%	12.02%
RSBY Return Stacked Bonds & Futures Yield ETF	18.52%	-12.98%

Correlation

The correlation between JANU and RSBY is -0.22, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	-0.22
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 2, 2025	-0.19

Return for Risk

JANU vs. RSBY — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

JANU

JANU Risk / Return Rank: 60
JANU Sharpe Ratio Rank: 57
JANU Sortino Ratio Rank: 57
JANU Omega Ratio Rank: 55
JANU Calmar Ratio Rank: 66
JANU Martin Ratio Rank: 66

RSBY

RSBY Risk / Return Rank: 51
RSBY Sharpe Ratio Rank: 55
RSBY Sortino Ratio Rank: 57
RSBY Omega Ratio Rank: 51
RSBY Calmar Ratio Rank: 54
RSBY Martin Ratio Rank: 40

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

JANU vs. RSBY - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for AllianzIM U.S. Equity Buffer15 Uncapped Jan ETF (JANU) and Return Stacked Bonds & Futures Yield ETF (RSBY). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	JANU	RSBY	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	1.54	1.50	+0.04
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	2.18	2.18	0.00
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.28	1.26	+0.02
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	2.63	2.15	+0.48
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	9.46	5.04	+4.42

JANU vs. RSBY - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current JANU Sharpe Ratio is 1.54, which is comparable to the RSBY Sharpe Ratio of 1.50. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of JANU and RSBY, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

JANU vs. RSBY - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum JANU drawdown since its inception was -11.84%, smaller than the maximum RSBY drawdown of -23.32%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for JANU and RSBY.

Drawdown Indicators

	JANU	RSBY	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-11.84%	-23.32%	+11.48%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-5.98%	-7.95%	+1.97%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-0.71%	-6.45%	+5.74%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-1.87%	-13.35%	+11.48%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	1.66%	3.39%	-1.73%

Volatility

JANU vs. RSBY - Volatility Comparison

AllianzIM U.S. Equity Buffer15 Uncapped Jan ETF (JANU) has a higher volatility of 3.74% compared to Return Stacked Bonds & Futures Yield ETF (RSBY) at 3.15%. This indicates that JANU's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than RSBY based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	JANU	RSBY	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	3.74%	3.15%	+0.59%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	7.54%	8.37%	-0.83%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	10.23%	11.41%	-1.18%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	11.58%	13.37%	-1.79%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	11.58%	13.37%	-1.79%

JANU vs. RSBY - Expense Ratio Comparison

JANU has a 0.74% expense ratio, which is lower than RSBY's 0.98% expense ratio.

Dividends

JANU vs. RSBY - Dividend Comparison

JANU has not paid dividends to shareholders, while RSBY's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.75%.

Position	TTM	2025	2024
JANU AllianzIM U.S. Equity Buffer15 Uncapped Jan ETF	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
RSBY Return Stacked Bonds & Futures Yield ETF	1.75%	2.07%	2.29%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both JANU and RSBY in my portfolio?

JANU and RSBY have a correlation of -0.22, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, JANU or RSBY?

JANU has higher volatility (3.74%) compared to RSBY (3.15%). In terms of maximum drawdown, JANU dropped -11.84% vs RSBY's -23.32%.

Which ETF is better, JANU or RSBY?

On 1-year performance, RSBY leads with 17.35% vs 16.00% for JANU. On fees, JANU is cheaper at 0.74% per year. On volatility, RSBY has been the lower-risk option at 3.15%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, JANU or RSBY?

Over the 1-year period, RSBY has performed better with a 17.35% return vs 16.00%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, JANU or RSBY?

JANU is cheaper with a 0.74% expense ratio, compared with 0.98% for RSBY.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, JANU or RSBY?

RSBY has the higher dividend yield at 1.75%, compared with 0.00% for JANU.

What is the main difference between JANU and RSBY?

JANU is categorized as Defined Outcome, while RSBY is Multistrategy. They also come from different issuers: AllianzIM and Return Stacked. Their fees differ too: 0.74% for JANU and 0.98% for RSBY.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

JANU currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.54 vs 1.50), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.