PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
JANT vs. SMST
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

JANT vs. SMST - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in AllianzIM U.S. Large Cap Buffer10 Jan ETF (JANT) and Defiance Daily Target 2X Short MSTR ETF (SMST). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, JANT achieves a 5.59% return, which is significantly higher than SMST's -5.14% return.


JANT

1D
0.02%
1M
-0.63%
YTD
5.59%
6M
5.78%
1Y
16.68%
3Y*
15.55%
5Y*
9.86%
10Y*

SMST

1D
18.45%
1M
181.70%
YTD
-5.14%
6M
2.86%
1Y
236.89%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

JANT vs. SMST - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024
JANT
AllianzIM U.S. Large Cap Buffer10 Jan ETF
5.59%14.30%4.19%
SMST
Defiance Daily Target 2X Short MSTR ETF
-5.14%-44.36%-91.71%

Correlation

The correlation between JANT and SMST is -0.49, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

-0.49

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Aug 21, 2024

-0.45

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

JANT vs. SMST — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

JANT
JANT Risk / Return Rank: 7878
Overall Rank
JANT Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7979
Sharpe Ratio Rank
JANT Sortino Ratio Rank: 8181
Sortino Ratio Rank
JANT Omega Ratio Rank: 8484
Omega Ratio Rank
JANT Calmar Ratio Rank: 6464
Calmar Ratio Rank
JANT Martin Ratio Rank: 8282
Martin Ratio Rank

SMST
SMST Risk / Return Rank: 5353
Overall Rank
SMST Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5454
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SMST Sortino Ratio Rank: 5555
Sortino Ratio Rank
SMST Omega Ratio Rank: 5454
Omega Ratio Rank
SMST Calmar Ratio Rank: 6464
Calmar Ratio Rank
SMST Martin Ratio Rank: 3838
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

JANT vs. SMST - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for AllianzIM U.S. Large Cap Buffer10 Jan ETF (JANT) and Defiance Daily Target 2X Short MSTR ETF (SMST). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


JANTSMSTDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.58

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.81

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.44

1.30

+0.14

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.82

2.79

+0.03

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

14.44

5.52

+8.92

JANT vs. SMST - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current JANT Sharpe Ratio is 2.21, which is higher than the SMST Sharpe Ratio of 1.63. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of JANT and SMST, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

JANT vs. SMST - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum JANT drawdown since its inception was -16.18%, smaller than the maximum SMST drawdown of -99.25%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for JANT and SMST.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


JANTSMSTDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-16.18%

-99.25%

+83.07%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-5.94%

-85.39%

+79.45%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-13.25%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-16.18%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-1.26%

-96.27%

+95.01%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-2.65%

-90.74%

+88.09%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.16%

43.15%

-41.99%

Volatility

JANT vs. SMST - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for AllianzIM U.S. Large Cap Buffer10 Jan ETF (JANT) is 2.41%, while Defiance Daily Target 2X Short MSTR ETF (SMST) has a volatility of 46.13%. This indicates that JANT experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than SMST based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


JANTSMSTDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

2.41%

46.13%

-43.72%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

6.32%

130.40%

-124.08%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

7.58%

146.32%

-138.74%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

11.36%

167.25%

-155.89%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

11.09%

167.25%

-156.16%

JANT vs. SMST - Expense Ratio Comparison

JANT has a 0.74% expense ratio, which is lower than SMST's 1.29% expense ratio.


Dividends

JANT vs. SMST - Dividend Comparison

Neither JANT nor SMST has paid dividends to shareholders.


Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Frequently Asked Questions


JANT and SMST have a correlation of -0.49, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

SMST has higher volatility (46.13%) compared to JANT (2.41%). In terms of maximum drawdown, JANT dropped -16.18% vs SMST's -99.25%.

On 1-year performance, SMST leads with 236.89% vs 16.68% for JANT. On fees, JANT is cheaper at 0.74% per year. On volatility, JANT has been the lower-risk option at 2.41%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 1-year period, SMST has performed better with a 236.89% return vs 16.68%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

JANT is cheaper with a 0.74% expense ratio, compared with 1.29% for SMST.

JANT and SMST have nearly identical dividend yields, around 0.00%.

JANT is categorized as Options Trading, while SMST is Inverse Equities. They also come from different issuers: Allianz and Defiance. Their fees differ too: 0.74% for JANT and 1.29% for SMST.

JANT currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.21 vs 1.63), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for JANT and SMST

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer