JANT vs. SAUG

Last updated Jun 5, 2026

JANT (AllianzIM U.S. Large Cap Buffer10 Jan ETF) and SAUG (FT Cboe Vest U.S. Small Cap Moderate Buffer ETF - August) are both Options Trading funds. Both are actively managed. Over the past year, JANT returned 19.82% vs 19.94% for SAUG. A 0.74 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. JANT charges 0.74%/yr vs 0.90%/yr for SAUG.

Performance

JANT vs. SAUG - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in AllianzIM U.S. Large Cap Buffer10 Jan ETF (JANT) and FT Cboe Vest U.S. Small Cap Moderate Buffer ETF - August (SAUG). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, JANT achieves a 6.90% return, which is significantly lower than SAUG's 8.00% return.

JANT

• 1D: 0.27%
• 1M: 2.50%
• YTD: 6.90%
• 6M: 8.26%
• 1Y: 19.82%
• 3Y*: 16.53%
• 5Y*: 10.32%
• 10Y*: —

SAUG

• 1D: 0.33%
• 1M: 1.44%
• YTD: 8.00%
• 6M: 8.00%
• 1Y: 19.94%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

JANT vs. SAUG - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023
JANT AllianzIM U.S. Large Cap Buffer10 Jan ETF	6.90%	14.30%	16.01%	8.64%
SAUG FT Cboe Vest U.S. Small Cap Moderate Buffer ETF - August	8.00%	8.23%	11.08%	6.26%

Correlation

The correlation between JANT and SAUG is 0.75, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.75
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Aug 22, 2023	0.74

The correlation between JANT and SAUG has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.74 to 0.75 - a consistent structural relationship.

Return for Risk

JANT vs. SAUG — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

JANT

JANT Risk / Return Rank: 83
JANT Sharpe Ratio Rank: 83
JANT Sortino Ratio Rank: 87
JANT Omega Ratio Rank: 88
JANT Calmar Ratio Rank: 69
JANT Martin Ratio Rank: 86

SAUG

SAUG Risk / Return Rank: 74
SAUG Sharpe Ratio Rank: 64
SAUG Sortino Ratio Rank: 71
SAUG Omega Ratio Rank: 68
SAUG Calmar Ratio Rank: 87
SAUG Martin Ratio Rank: 81

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

JANT vs. SAUG - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for AllianzIM U.S. Large Cap Buffer10 Jan ETF (JANT) and FT Cboe Vest U.S. Small Cap Moderate Buffer ETF - August (SAUG). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	JANT	SAUG	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	2.67	2.10	+0.58
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	3.88	3.17	+0.71
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.54	1.40	+0.14
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	3.35	4.89	-1.54
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	17.58	15.90	+1.68
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

JANT vs. SAUG - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current JANT Sharpe Ratio is 2.67, which is comparable to the SAUG Sharpe Ratio of 2.10. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of JANT and SAUG, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	JANT	SAUG	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	2.67	2.10	+0.58
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.92	—	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	1.01	1.04	-0.03

Drawdowns

JANT vs. SAUG - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum JANT drawdown since its inception was -16.18%, which is greater than SAUG's maximum drawdown of -14.62%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for JANT and SAUG.

Drawdown Indicators

	JANT	SAUG	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-16.18%	-14.62%	-1.56%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-5.94%	-4.10%	-1.84%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-13.25%	—	—
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-16.18%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-0.03%	0.00%	-0.03%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-2.67%	-2.24%	-0.43%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	1.13%	1.26%	-0.13%

Volatility

JANT vs. SAUG - Volatility Comparison

AllianzIM U.S. Large Cap Buffer10 Jan ETF (JANT) has a higher volatility of 1.33% compared to FT Cboe Vest U.S. Small Cap Moderate Buffer ETF - August (SAUG) at 1.18%. This indicates that JANT's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than SAUG based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	JANT	SAUG	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	1.33%	1.18%	+0.15%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	5.96%	5.42%	+0.54%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	7.44%	9.56%	-2.12%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	11.31%	11.80%	-0.49%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	11.10%	11.80%	-0.70%

JANT vs. SAUG - Expense Ratio Comparison

JANT has a 0.74% expense ratio, which is lower than SAUG's 0.90% expense ratio.

Dividends

JANT vs. SAUG - Dividend Comparison

Neither JANT nor SAUG has paid dividends to shareholders.

Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both JANT and SAUG in my portfolio?

JANT and SAUG have a correlation of 0.75, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, JANT or SAUG?

JANT has higher volatility (1.33%) compared to SAUG (1.18%). In terms of maximum drawdown, JANT dropped -16.18% vs SAUG's -14.62%.

Which ETF is better, JANT or SAUG?

On 1-year performance, SAUG leads with 19.94% vs 19.82% for JANT. On fees, JANT is cheaper at 0.74% per year. On volatility, SAUG has been the lower-risk option at 1.18%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, JANT or SAUG?

Over the 1-year period, SAUG has performed better with a 19.94% return vs 19.82%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, JANT or SAUG?

JANT is cheaper with a 0.74% expense ratio, compared with 0.90% for SAUG.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, JANT or SAUG?

JANT and SAUG have nearly identical dividend yields, around 0.00%.

What is the main difference between JANT and SAUG?

They also come from different issuers: Allianz and FT Vest. Their fees differ too: 0.74% for JANT and 0.90% for SAUG.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

JANT currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.67 vs 2.10), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.