JANT vs. FEBP

Last updated Jun 26, 2026

JANT (AllianzIM U.S. Large Cap Buffer10 Jan ETF) and FEBP (PGIM US Large-Cap Buffer 12 ETF - February) are both Options Trading funds. Both are actively managed. Over the past year, JANT returned 16.68% vs 15.81% for FEBP. Their correlation of 0.94 suggests significant overlap in exposure. JANT charges 0.74%/yr vs 0.50%/yr for FEBP.

Performance

JANT vs. FEBP - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in AllianzIM U.S. Large Cap Buffer10 Jan ETF (JANT) and PGIM US Large-Cap Buffer 12 ETF - February (FEBP). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, JANT achieves a 5.59% return, which is significantly lower than FEBP's 5.87% return.

JANT

• 1D: 0.02%
• 1M: -0.63%
• YTD: 5.59%
• 6M: 5.78%
• 1Y: 16.68%
• 3Y*: 15.55%
• 5Y*: 9.86%
• 10Y*: —

FEBP

• 1D: -0.01%
• 1M: -0.55%
• YTD: 5.87%
• 6M: 5.63%
• 1Y: 15.81%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

JANT vs. FEBP - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024
JANT AllianzIM U.S. Large Cap Buffer10 Jan ETF	5.59%	14.30%	14.79%
FEBP PGIM US Large-Cap Buffer 12 ETF - February	5.87%	12.06%	11.40%

Correlation

The correlation between JANT and FEBP is 0.96 - these two move nearly in lockstep. At this level, holding both provides almost no diversification benefit. If you already own one, adding the other does little to reduce portfolio risk.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.96
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 1, 2024	0.94

The correlation between JANT and FEBP has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.94 to 0.96 - a consistent structural relationship.

Return for Risk

JANT vs. FEBP — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

JANT

JANT Risk / Return Rank: 78
JANT Sharpe Ratio Rank: 79
JANT Sortino Ratio Rank: 81
JANT Omega Ratio Rank: 84
JANT Calmar Ratio Rank: 64
JANT Martin Ratio Rank: 82

FEBP

FEBP Risk / Return Rank: 79
FEBP Sharpe Ratio Rank: 80
FEBP Sortino Ratio Rank: 82
FEBP Omega Ratio Rank: 84
FEBP Calmar Ratio Rank: 66
FEBP Martin Ratio Rank: 83

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

JANT vs. FEBP - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for AllianzIM U.S. Large Cap Buffer10 Jan ETF (JANT) and PGIM US Large-Cap Buffer 12 ETF - February (FEBP). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	JANT	FEBP	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	2.21	2.25	-0.04
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	3.17	3.21	-0.04
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.44	1.44	0.00
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	2.82	2.90	-0.08
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	14.44	14.67	-0.24

JANT vs. FEBP - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current JANT Sharpe Ratio is 2.21, which is comparable to the FEBP Sharpe Ratio of 2.25. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of JANT and FEBP, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

JANT vs. FEBP - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum JANT drawdown since its inception was -16.18%, which is greater than FEBP's maximum drawdown of -12.11%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for JANT and FEBP.

Drawdown Indicators

	JANT	FEBP	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-16.18%	-12.11%	-4.07%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-5.94%	-5.47%	-0.47%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-13.25%	—	—
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-16.18%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-1.26%	-1.12%	-0.14%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-2.65%	-0.92%	-1.73%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	1.16%	1.08%	+0.08%

Volatility

JANT vs. FEBP - Volatility Comparison

AllianzIM U.S. Large Cap Buffer10 Jan ETF (JANT) has a higher volatility of 2.41% compared to PGIM US Large-Cap Buffer 12 ETF - February (FEBP) at 2.21%. This indicates that JANT's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than FEBP based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	JANT	FEBP	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	2.41%	2.21%	+0.20%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	6.32%	5.74%	+0.58%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	7.58%	7.06%	+0.52%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	11.36%	9.01%	+2.35%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	11.09%	9.01%	+2.08%

JANT vs. FEBP - Expense Ratio Comparison

JANT has a 0.74% expense ratio, which is higher than FEBP's 0.50% expense ratio.

Dividends

JANT vs. FEBP - Dividend Comparison

Neither JANT nor FEBP has paid dividends to shareholders.

Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both JANT and FEBP in my portfolio?

With a correlation of 0.96, JANT and FEBP move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

Which is riskier, JANT or FEBP?

JANT has higher volatility (2.41%) compared to FEBP (2.21%). In terms of maximum drawdown, JANT dropped -16.18% vs FEBP's -12.11%.

Which ETF is better, JANT or FEBP?

On 1-year performance, JANT leads with 16.68% vs 15.81% for FEBP. On fees, FEBP is cheaper at 0.50% per year. On volatility, FEBP has been the lower-risk option at 2.21%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, JANT or FEBP?

Over the 1-year period, JANT has performed better with a 16.68% return vs 15.81%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, JANT or FEBP?

FEBP is cheaper with a 0.50% expense ratio, compared with 0.74% for JANT.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, JANT or FEBP?

JANT and FEBP have nearly identical dividend yields, around 0.00%.

What is the main difference between JANT and FEBP?

They also come from different issuers: Allianz and PGIM. Their fees differ too: 0.74% for JANT and 0.50% for FEBP.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

FEBP currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.25 vs 2.21), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.