FEBP vs. JUNT

Last updated Jun 6, 2026

FEBP (PGIM US Large-Cap Buffer 12 ETF - February) and JUNT (AllianzIM U.S. Large Cap Buffer10 Jun ETF) are both Options Trading funds. Both are actively managed. Over the past year, FEBP returned 17.79% vs 12.83% for JUNT. Their correlation of 0.91 suggests significant overlap in exposure. FEBP charges 0.50%/yr vs 0.74%/yr for JUNT.

Performance

FEBP vs. JUNT - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in PGIM US Large-Cap Buffer 12 ETF - February (FEBP) and AllianzIM U.S. Large Cap Buffer10 Jun ETF (JUNT). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, FEBP achieves a 5.81% return, which is significantly higher than JUNT's 2.88% return.

FEBP

• 1D: -1.11%
• 1M: 0.43%
• YTD: 5.81%
• 6M: 6.64%
• 1Y: 17.79%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

JUNT

• 1D: -1.60%
• 1M: -1.04%
• YTD: 2.88%
• 6M: 3.49%
• 1Y: 12.83%
• 3Y*: 13.58%
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

FEBP vs. JUNT - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024
FEBP PGIM US Large-Cap Buffer 12 ETF - February	5.81%	12.06%	12.73%
JUNT AllianzIM U.S. Large Cap Buffer10 Jun ETF	2.88%	12.42%	13.81%

Correlation

The correlation between FEBP and JUNT is 0.94, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.94
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 2, 2024	0.91

The correlation between FEBP and JUNT has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.91 to 0.94 - a consistent structural relationship.

Return for Risk

FEBP vs. JUNT — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

FEBP

FEBP Risk / Return Rank: 82
FEBP Sharpe Ratio Rank: 83
FEBP Sortino Ratio Rank: 85
FEBP Omega Ratio Rank: 86
FEBP Calmar Ratio Rank: 70
FEBP Martin Ratio Rank: 85

JUNT

JUNT Risk / Return Rank: 76
JUNT Sharpe Ratio Rank: 70
JUNT Sortino Ratio Rank: 73
JUNT Omega Ratio Rank: 82
JUNT Calmar Ratio Rank: 68
JUNT Martin Ratio Rank: 87

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

FEBP vs. JUNT - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for PGIM US Large-Cap Buffer 12 ETF - February (FEBP) and AllianzIM U.S. Large Cap Buffer10 Jun ETF (JUNT). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	FEBP	JUNT	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	2.54	2.14	+0.40
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	3.61	3.07	+0.54
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.50	1.46	+0.04
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	3.27	3.16	+0.11
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	16.83	18.02	-1.19
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

FEBP vs. JUNT - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current FEBP Sharpe Ratio is 2.54, which is comparable to the JUNT Sharpe Ratio of 2.14. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FEBP and JUNT, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	FEBP	JUNT	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	2.54	2.14	+0.40
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	1.48	1.52	-0.05

Drawdowns

FEBP vs. JUNT - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FEBP drawdown since its inception was -12.11%, smaller than the maximum JUNT drawdown of -12.78%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FEBP and JUNT.

Drawdown Indicators

	FEBP	JUNT	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-12.11%	-12.78%	+0.67%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-5.47%	-4.08%	-1.39%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	—	-12.78%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-1.17%	-1.70%	+0.53%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-0.91%	-0.98%	+0.07%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	1.06%	0.71%	+0.35%

Volatility

FEBP vs. JUNT - Volatility Comparison

PGIM US Large-Cap Buffer 12 ETF - February (FEBP) and AllianzIM U.S. Large Cap Buffer10 Jun ETF (JUNT) have volatilities of 1.73% and 1.75%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	FEBP	JUNT	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	1.73%	1.75%	-0.02%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	5.56%	4.68%	+0.88%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	7.06%	6.04%	+1.02%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	9.00%	9.28%	-0.28%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	9.00%	9.28%	-0.28%

FEBP vs. JUNT - Expense Ratio Comparison

FEBP has a 0.50% expense ratio, which is lower than JUNT's 0.74% expense ratio.

Dividends

FEBP vs. JUNT - Dividend Comparison

Neither FEBP nor JUNT has paid dividends to shareholders.

Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both FEBP and JUNT in my portfolio?

With a correlation of 0.94, FEBP and JUNT move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

Which is riskier, FEBP or JUNT?

JUNT has higher volatility (1.75%) compared to FEBP (1.73%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FEBP dropped -12.11% vs JUNT's -12.78%.

Which ETF is better, FEBP or JUNT?

On 1-year performance, FEBP leads with 17.79% vs 12.83% for JUNT. On fees, FEBP is cheaper at 0.50% per year. Their volatility is very similar. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, FEBP or JUNT?

Over the 1-year period, FEBP has performed better with a 17.79% return vs 12.83%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, FEBP or JUNT?

FEBP is cheaper with a 0.50% expense ratio, compared with 0.74% for JUNT.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, FEBP or JUNT?

FEBP and JUNT have nearly identical dividend yields, around 0.00%.

What is the main difference between FEBP and JUNT?

They also come from different issuers: PGIM and Allianz. Their fees differ too: 0.50% for FEBP and 0.74% for JUNT.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

FEBP currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.54 vs 2.14), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.