JANP vs. JPO

Last updated Jun 4, 2026

JANP (PGIM US Large-Cap Buffer 12 ETF - January) and JPO (YieldMax JPM Option Income Strategy ETF) are both Options Trading funds. Both are actively managed. Over the past year, JANP returned 17.69% vs 12.20% for JPO. At a 0.45 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. JANP charges 0.50%/yr vs 1.19%/yr for JPO.

Performance

JANP vs. JPO - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in PGIM US Large-Cap Buffer 12 ETF - January (JANP) and YieldMax JPM Option Income Strategy ETF (JPO). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, JANP achieves a 6.08% return, which is significantly higher than JPO's -4.07% return.

JANP

• 1D: -0.20%
• 1M: 2.35%
• YTD: 6.08%
• 6M: 7.23%
• 1Y: 17.69%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

JPO

• 1D: -0.07%
• 1M: -1.34%
• YTD: -4.07%
• 6M: -0.99%
• 1Y: 12.20%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

JANP vs. JPO - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024
JANP PGIM US Large-Cap Buffer 12 ETF - January	6.08%	13.33%	15.74%
JPO YieldMax JPM Option Income Strategy ETF	-4.07%	22.26%	13.20%

Correlation

The correlation between JANP and JPO is 0.47, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.47
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 3, 2024	0.45

Return for Risk

JANP vs. JPO — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

JANP

JANP Risk / Return Rank: 81
JANP Sharpe Ratio Rank: 81
JANP Sortino Ratio Rank: 85
JANP Omega Ratio Rank: 88
JANP Calmar Ratio Rank: 68
JANP Martin Ratio Rank: 84

JPO

JPO Risk / Return Rank: 20
JPO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 20
JPO Sortino Ratio Rank: 19
JPO Omega Ratio Rank: 19
JPO Calmar Ratio Rank: 20
JPO Martin Ratio Rank: 20

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

JANP vs. JPO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for PGIM US Large-Cap Buffer 12 ETF - January (JANP) and YieldMax JPM Option Income Strategy ETF (JPO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	JANP	JPO	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	2.63	0.66	+1.97
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	3.78	0.96	+2.82
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.55	1.13	+0.42
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	3.34	0.86	+2.48
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	17.41	2.15	+15.26
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

JANP vs. JPO - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current JANP Sharpe Ratio is 2.63, which is higher than the JPO Sharpe Ratio of 0.66. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of JANP and JPO, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	JANP	JPO	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	2.63	0.66	+1.97
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	1.63	0.70	+0.92

Drawdowns

JANP vs. JPO - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum JANP drawdown since its inception was -12.18%, smaller than the maximum JPO drawdown of -24.80%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for JANP and JPO.

Drawdown Indicators

	JANP	JPO	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-12.18%	-24.80%	+12.62%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-5.32%	-14.24%	+8.92%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-0.20%	-6.88%	+6.68%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-0.90%	-4.60%	+3.70%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	1.02%	5.69%	-4.67%

Volatility

JANP vs. JPO - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for PGIM US Large-Cap Buffer 12 ETF - January (JANP) is 1.39%, while YieldMax JPM Option Income Strategy ETF (JPO) has a volatility of 5.97%. This indicates that JANP experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than JPO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	JANP	JPO	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	1.39%	5.97%	-4.58%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	5.52%	15.16%	-9.64%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	6.77%	18.62%	-11.85%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	9.07%	19.04%	-9.97%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	9.07%	19.04%	-9.97%

JANP vs. JPO - Expense Ratio Comparison

JANP has a 0.50% expense ratio, which is lower than JPO's 1.19% expense ratio.

Dividends

JANP vs. JPO - Dividend Comparison

JANP has not paid dividends to shareholders, while JPO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 34.24%.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023
JANP PGIM US Large-Cap Buffer 12 ETF - January	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
JPO YieldMax JPM Option Income Strategy ETF	34.24%	34.13%	25.15%	4.84%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both JANP and JPO in my portfolio?

JANP and JPO have a correlation of 0.47, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, JANP or JPO?

JPO has higher volatility (5.97%) compared to JANP (1.39%). In terms of maximum drawdown, JANP dropped -12.18% vs JPO's -24.80%.

Which ETF is better, JANP or JPO?

On 1-year performance, JANP leads with 17.69% vs 12.20% for JPO. On fees, JANP is cheaper at 0.50% per year. On volatility, JANP has been the lower-risk option at 1.39%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, JANP or JPO?

Over the 1-year period, JANP has performed better with a 17.69% return vs 12.20%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, JANP or JPO?

JANP is cheaper with a 0.50% expense ratio, compared with 1.19% for JPO.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, JANP or JPO?

JPO has the higher dividend yield at 34.24%, compared with 0.00% for JANP.

What is the main difference between JANP and JPO?

They also come from different issuers: PGIM and Tidal. Their fees differ too: 0.50% for JANP and 1.19% for JPO.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

JANP currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.63 vs 0.66), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.