JANM vs. YCS
JANM (FT Vest U.S. Equity Max Buffer ETF - January) and YCS (ProShares UltraShort Yen) are both exchange-traded funds - JANM is a Defined Outcome fund actively managed by First Trust, while YCS is a Leveraged Currency fund tracking the USD/JPY Exchange Rate (-200%). JANM is actively managed, while YCS is passively managed. Over the past year, JANM returned 7.19% vs 31.27% for YCS. At a correlation of -0.04, they often move in opposite directions. JANM charges 0.85%/yr vs 1.00%/yr for YCS.
Performance
JANM vs. YCS - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, JANM achieves a 2.24% return, which is significantly lower than YCS's 9.63% return.
JANM
- 1D
- -0.22%
- 1M
- 0.01%
- YTD
- 2.24%
- 6M
- 2.45%
- 1Y
- 7.19%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
YCS
- 1D
- -0.14%
- 1M
- 3.57%
- YTD
- 9.63%
- 6M
- 10.44%
- 1Y
- 31.27%
- 3Y*
- 18.37%
- 5Y*
- 23.52%
- 10Y*
- 13.62%
JANM vs. YCS - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
JANM FT Vest U.S. Equity Max Buffer ETF - January | 2.24% | 6.18% |
YCS ProShares UltraShort Yen | 9.63% | 7.93% |
Correlation
The correlation between JANM and YCS is -0.20, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -0.20 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 21, 2025 | -0.04 |
The correlation between JANM and YCS shifts across timeframes, from -0.20 (1 year) to -0.04 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
JANM vs. YCS — Risk / Return Rank
JANM
YCS
JANM vs. YCS - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for FT Vest U.S. Equity Max Buffer ETF - January (JANM) and ProShares UltraShort Yen (YCS). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| JANM | YCS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +1.16 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +2.29 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.67 | 1.34 | +0.32 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 4.25 | 3.78 | +0.47 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 22.88 | 11.93 | +10.95 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
JANM vs. YCS - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum JANM drawdown since its inception was -2.83%, smaller than the maximum YCS drawdown of -49.56%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for JANM and YCS.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| JANM | YCS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -2.83% | -49.56% | +46.73% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -1.70% | -8.30% | +6.60% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | — | -23.05% | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -27.32% | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -27.32% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.35% | -0.14% | -0.21% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -0.35% | -19.87% | +19.52% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 0.31% | 2.65% | -2.34% |
Volatility
JANM vs. YCS - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for FT Vest U.S. Equity Max Buffer ETF - January (JANM) is 0.76%, while ProShares UltraShort Yen (YCS) has a volatility of 2.25%. This indicates that JANM experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than YCS based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| JANM | YCS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 0.76% | 2.25% | -1.49% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 1.93% | 12.19% | -10.26% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.40% | 16.93% | -14.53% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 2.91% | 21.10% | -18.19% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 2.91% | 18.82% | -15.91% |
JANM vs. YCS - Expense Ratio Comparison
JANM has a 0.85% expense ratio, which is lower than YCS's 1.00% expense ratio.
Dividends
JANM vs. YCS - Dividend Comparison
Neither JANM nor YCS has paid dividends to shareholders.
Frequently Asked Questions
JANM and YCS have a correlation of -0.20, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
YCS has higher volatility (2.25%) compared to JANM (0.76%). In terms of maximum drawdown, JANM dropped -2.83% vs YCS's -49.56%.
On 1-year performance, YCS leads with 31.27% vs 7.19% for JANM. On fees, JANM is cheaper at 0.85% per year. On volatility, JANM has been the lower-risk option at 0.76%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 1-year period, YCS has performed better with a 31.27% return vs 7.19%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
JANM is cheaper with a 0.85% expense ratio, compared with 1.00% for YCS.
JANM and YCS have nearly identical dividend yields, around 0.00%.
JANM is categorized as Defined Outcome, while YCS is Leveraged Currency. They also come from different issuers: First Trust and ProShares. Their fees differ too: 0.85% for JANM and 1.00% for YCS.
JANM currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (3.02 vs 1.86), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for JANM and YCS
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer