JANI vs. JULB
JANI (AllianzIM International Equity Buffer15 Uncapped Jan ETF) and JULB (Aptus July Buffer ETF) are both Defined Outcome funds. Both are actively managed. A 0.79 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. JANI charges 0.79%/yr vs 0.25%/yr for JULB.
Performance
JANI vs. JULB - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
JANI
- 1D
- -0.52%
- 1M
- 2.36%
- YTD
- —
- 6M
- —
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
JULB
- 1D
- -0.07%
- 1M
- 2.40%
- YTD
- 6.35%
- 6M
- 6.93%
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
JANI vs. JULB - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | |
|---|---|
JANI AllianzIM International Equity Buffer15 Uncapped Jan ETF | 1.62% |
JULB Aptus July Buffer ETF | 5.11% |
Correlation
The correlation between JANI and JULB is 0.79, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 3, 2026 | 0.79 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
JANI vs. JULB - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for AllianzIM International Equity Buffer15 Uncapped Jan ETF (JANI) and Aptus July Buffer ETF (JULB). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| JANI | JULB | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.36 | 2.17 | -1.81 |
Drawdowns
JANI vs. JULB - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum JANI drawdown since its inception was -7.50%, which is greater than JULB's maximum drawdown of -5.24%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for JANI and JULB.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| JANI | JULB | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -7.50% | -5.24% | -2.26% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -1.23% | -0.07% | -1.16% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -2.54% | -0.87% | -1.67% |
Volatility
JANI vs. JULB - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| JANI | JULB | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 13.66% | 6.81% | +6.85% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 13.66% | 6.81% | +6.85% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 13.66% | 6.81% | +6.85% |
JANI vs. JULB - Expense Ratio Comparison
JANI has a 0.79% expense ratio, which is higher than JULB's 0.25% expense ratio.
Dividends
JANI vs. JULB - Dividend Comparison
Neither JANI nor JULB has paid dividends to shareholders.
Frequently Asked Questions
JANI and JULB have a correlation of 0.79, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, JULB is cheaper at 0.25% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
JULB is cheaper with a 0.25% expense ratio, compared with 0.79% for JANI.
JANI and JULB have nearly identical dividend yields, around 0.00%.
They also come from different issuers: AllianzIM and Aptus Capital Advisors. Their fees differ too: 0.79% for JANI and 0.25% for JULB.
Find the right allocation for JANI and JULB
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer