PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
JANH vs. HEQT
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

JANH vs. HEQT - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Innovator Premium Income 20 Barrier ETF - January (JANH) and Simplify Hedged Equity ETF (HEQT). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, JANH achieves a 3.50% return, which is significantly lower than HEQT's 4.76% return.


JANH

1D
-0.04%
1M
0.38%
YTD
3.50%
6M
3.49%
1Y
7.63%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

HEQT

1D
-0.21%
1M
0.57%
YTD
4.76%
6M
4.67%
1Y
14.00%
3Y*
13.21%
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

JANH vs. HEQT - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024
JANH
Innovator Premium Income 20 Barrier ETF - January
3.50%6.34%7.25%
HEQT
Simplify Hedged Equity ETF
4.76%10.08%18.30%

Correlation

The correlation between JANH and HEQT is 0.76, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.76

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 2, 2024

0.73

The correlation between JANH and HEQT has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.73 to 0.76 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

JANH vs. HEQT — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

JANH
JANH Risk / Return Rank: 7575
Overall Rank
JANH Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7070
Sharpe Ratio Rank
JANH Sortino Ratio Rank: 7979
Sortino Ratio Rank
JANH Omega Ratio Rank: 9292
Omega Ratio Rank
JANH Calmar Ratio Rank: 5252
Calmar Ratio Rank
JANH Martin Ratio Rank: 8080
Martin Ratio Rank

HEQT
HEQT Risk / Return Rank: 6868
Overall Rank
HEQT Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6868
Sharpe Ratio Rank
HEQT Sortino Ratio Rank: 6969
Sortino Ratio Rank
HEQT Omega Ratio Rank: 7777
Omega Ratio Rank
HEQT Calmar Ratio Rank: 5757
Calmar Ratio Rank
HEQT Martin Ratio Rank: 7070
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

JANH vs. HEQT - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Innovator Premium Income 20 Barrier ETF - January (JANH) and Simplify Hedged Equity ETF (HEQT). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


JANHHEQTDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.06

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.36

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.59

1.43

+0.16

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.52

2.76

-0.24

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

15.40

12.50

+2.90

JANH vs. HEQT - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current JANH Sharpe Ratio is 2.19, which is comparable to the HEQT Sharpe Ratio of 2.13. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of JANH and HEQT, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

JANH vs. HEQT - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum JANH drawdown since its inception was -8.00%, smaller than the maximum HEQT drawdown of -11.51%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for JANH and HEQT.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


JANHHEQTDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-8.00%

-11.51%

+3.51%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-3.04%

-5.09%

+2.05%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-10.57%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.10%

-0.42%

+0.32%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-0.30%

-2.77%

+2.47%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

0.50%

1.12%

-0.62%

Volatility

JANH vs. HEQT - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Innovator Premium Income 20 Barrier ETF - January (JANH) is 0.84%, while Simplify Hedged Equity ETF (HEQT) has a volatility of 1.92%. This indicates that JANH experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than HEQT based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


JANHHEQTDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

0.84%

1.92%

-1.08%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

3.41%

5.47%

-2.06%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

3.51%

6.61%

-3.10%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

6.34%

8.47%

-2.13%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

6.34%

8.47%

-2.13%

JANH vs. HEQT - Expense Ratio Comparison

JANH has a 0.79% expense ratio, which is higher than HEQT's 0.43% expense ratio.


Dividends

JANH vs. HEQT - Dividend Comparison

JANH's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 6.12%, more than HEQT's 1.20% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021
HEQT
Simplify Hedged Equity ETF
1.20%1.19%1.29%4.10%3.94%0.27%
JANH
Innovator Premium Income 20 Barrier ETF - January
6.12%6.20%6.71%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


JANH and HEQT have a correlation of 0.76, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

HEQT has higher volatility (1.92%) compared to JANH (0.84%). In terms of maximum drawdown, JANH dropped -8.00% vs HEQT's -11.51%.

On 1-year performance, HEQT leads with 14.00% vs 7.63% for JANH. On fees, HEQT is cheaper at 0.43% per year. On volatility, JANH has been the lower-risk option at 0.84%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 1-year period, HEQT has performed better with a 14.00% return vs 7.63%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

HEQT is cheaper with a 0.43% expense ratio, compared with 0.79% for JANH.

JANH has the higher dividend yield at 6.12%, compared with 1.20% for HEQT.

JANH is categorized as Options Trading, while HEQT is Equity Hedged. They also come from different issuers: Innovator and Simplify. Their fees differ too: 0.79% for JANH and 0.43% for HEQT.

JANH currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.19 vs 2.13), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for JANH and HEQT

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer