JANB vs. UXJL
JANB (Aptus January Buffer ETF) and UXJL (FT Vest U.S. Equity Uncapped Accelerator ETF - July) are both Defined Outcome funds. Both are actively managed. Their correlation of 0.95 suggests significant overlap in exposure. JANB charges 0.25%/yr vs 0.85%/yr for UXJL.
Performance
JANB vs. UXJL - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, JANB achieves a 6.08% return, which is significantly lower than UXJL's 11.78% return.
JANB
- 1D
- -0.22%
- 1M
- 2.38%
- YTD
- 6.08%
- 6M
- 7.10%
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
UXJL
- 1D
- -0.76%
- 1M
- 6.02%
- YTD
- 11.78%
- 6M
- 11.50%
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
JANB vs. UXJL - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
JANB Aptus January Buffer ETF | 6.08% | 2.69% |
UXJL FT Vest U.S. Equity Uncapped Accelerator ETF - July | 11.78% | 3.04% |
Correlation
The correlation between JANB and UXJL is 0.95, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 15, 2025 | 0.95 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
JANB vs. UXJL - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Aptus January Buffer ETF (JANB) and FT Vest U.S. Equity Uncapped Accelerator ETF - July (UXJL). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| JANB | UXJL | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 1.97 | 1.87 | +0.10 |
Drawdowns
JANB vs. UXJL - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum JANB drawdown since its inception was -6.52%, smaller than the maximum UXJL drawdown of -10.29%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for JANB and UXJL.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| JANB | UXJL | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -6.52% | -10.29% | +3.77% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.22% | -0.76% | +0.54% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -1.14% | -1.51% | +0.37% |
Volatility
JANB vs. UXJL - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| JANB | UXJL | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 7.41% | 13.90% | -6.49% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 7.41% | 13.90% | -6.49% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 7.41% | 13.90% | -6.49% |
JANB vs. UXJL - Expense Ratio Comparison
JANB has a 0.25% expense ratio, which is lower than UXJL's 0.85% expense ratio.
Dividends
JANB vs. UXJL - Dividend Comparison
Neither JANB nor UXJL has paid dividends to shareholders.
Frequently Asked Questions
With a correlation of 0.95, JANB and UXJL move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.
On fees, JANB is cheaper at 0.25% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
JANB is cheaper with a 0.25% expense ratio, compared with 0.85% for UXJL.
JANB and UXJL have nearly identical dividend yields, around 0.00%.
They also come from different issuers: Aptus Capital Advisors and First Trust. Their fees differ too: 0.25% for JANB and 0.85% for UXJL.
Find the right allocation for JANB and UXJL
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer