JANB vs. EJUL

Last updated Jun 5, 2026

JANB (Aptus January Buffer ETF) and EJUL (Innovator Emerging Markets Power Buffer ETF - July) are both Defined Outcome funds. JANB is actively managed, while EJUL is passively managed. A 0.73 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. JANB charges 0.25%/yr vs 0.89%/yr for EJUL.

Performance

JANB vs. EJUL - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Aptus January Buffer ETF (JANB) and Innovator Emerging Markets Power Buffer ETF - July (EJUL). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, JANB achieves a 6.28% return, which is significantly higher than EJUL's 4.79% return.

JANB

• 1D: 0.19%
• 1M: 2.16%
• YTD: 6.28%
• 6M: 7.26%
• 1Y: —
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

EJUL

• 1D: 0.16%
• 1M: 0.58%
• YTD: 4.79%
• 6M: 6.15%
• 1Y: 17.58%
• 3Y*: 10.38%
• 5Y*: 3.05%
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

JANB vs. EJUL - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025
JANB Aptus January Buffer ETF	6.28%	2.69%
EJUL Innovator Emerging Markets Power Buffer ETF - July	4.79%	2.84%

Correlation

The correlation between JANB and EJUL is 0.73, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.

	Correlation
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 15, 2025	0.73

Return for Risk

JANB vs. EJUL — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

EJUL

EJUL Risk / Return Rank: 85
EJUL Sharpe Ratio Rank: 77
EJUL Sortino Ratio Rank: 84
EJUL Omega Ratio Rank: 87
EJUL Calmar Ratio Rank: 85
EJUL Martin Ratio Rank: 90

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

JANB vs. EJUL - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Aptus January Buffer ETF (JANB) and Innovator Emerging Markets Power Buffer ETF - July (EJUL). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	JANB	EJUL	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	—	2.45	—
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	—	0.29	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	2.00	0.27	+1.74

Drawdowns

JANB vs. EJUL - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum JANB drawdown since its inception was -6.52%, smaller than the maximum EJUL drawdown of -21.61%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for JANB and EJUL.

Drawdown Indicators

	JANB	EJUL	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-6.52%	-21.61%	+15.09%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	—	-3.81%	—
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	—	-8.36%	—
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	—	-21.61%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-0.04%	-0.06%	+0.02%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-1.13%	-6.61%	+5.48%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	—	0.87%	—

Volatility

Volatility by Period

	JANB	EJUL	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	—	0.83%	—
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	—	4.73%	—
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	7.39%	7.30%	+0.09%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	7.39%	10.66%	-3.27%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	7.39%	11.44%	-4.05%

JANB vs. EJUL - Expense Ratio Comparison

JANB has a 0.25% expense ratio, which is lower than EJUL's 0.89% expense ratio.

Dividends

JANB vs. EJUL - Dividend Comparison

Neither JANB nor EJUL has paid dividends to shareholders.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019
EJUL Innovator Emerging Markets Power Buffer ETF - July	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.64%
JANB Aptus January Buffer ETF	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both JANB and EJUL in my portfolio?

JANB and EJUL have a correlation of 0.73, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which ETF is better, JANB or EJUL?

On fees, JANB is cheaper at 0.25% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF is cheaper, JANB or EJUL?

JANB is cheaper with a 0.25% expense ratio, compared with 0.89% for EJUL.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, JANB or EJUL?

JANB and EJUL have nearly identical dividend yields, around 0.00%.

What is the main difference between JANB and EJUL?

They also come from different issuers: Aptus Capital Advisors and Innovator. Their fees differ too: 0.25% for JANB and 0.89% for EJUL.