EJUL vs. ESGE
EJUL (Innovator Emerging Markets Power Buffer ETF - July) and ESGE (iShares ESG Aware MSCI EM ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - EJUL is a Defined Outcome fund tracking the MSCI Emerging Markets Index, while ESGE is a Emerging Markets Equities fund tracking the MSCI EM Extended ESG Focus Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, EJUL returned 3.01%/yr vs 6.83%/yr for ESGE. Their correlation of 0.88 suggests significant overlap in exposure. EJUL charges 0.89%/yr vs 0.25%/yr for ESGE.
Performance
EJUL vs. ESGE - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, EJUL achieves a 4.63% return, which is significantly lower than ESGE's 26.85% return.
EJUL
- 1D
- -0.23%
- 1M
- 0.57%
- YTD
- 4.63%
- 6M
- 6.20%
- 1Y
- 18.82%
- 3Y*
- 10.25%
- 5Y*
- 3.01%
- 10Y*
- —
ESGE
- 1D
- -1.23%
- 1M
- 9.37%
- YTD
- 26.85%
- 6M
- 29.21%
- 1Y
- 55.02%
- 3Y*
- 24.13%
- 5Y*
- 6.83%
- 10Y*
- —
EJUL vs. ESGE - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
EJUL Innovator Emerging Markets Power Buffer ETF - July | 4.63% | 20.20% | 4.38% | 3.50% | -10.92% | -2.43% | 1.06% | 3.10% |
ESGE iShares ESG Aware MSCI EM ETF | 26.85% | 35.86% | 6.63% | 9.51% | -22.41% | -2.87% | 18.60% | 6.52% |
Correlation
The correlation between EJUL and ESGE is 0.87, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.87 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.93 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.93 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 2, 2019 | 0.88 |
The correlation between EJUL and ESGE has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.87 to 0.93 - a consistent structural relationship.
EJUL vs. ESGE - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
EJUL
ESGE
Technology
Financial Services
Consumer Cyclical
Industrials
Communication Services
Basic Materials
Energy
Consumer Defensive
Healthcare
Utilities
Real Estate
Technology
EJUL
ESGE
Financial Services
EJUL
ESGE
Consumer Cyclical
EJUL
ESGE
Industrials
EJUL
ESGE
Communication Services
EJUL
ESGE
Basic Materials
EJUL
ESGE
Energy
EJUL
ESGE
Consumer Defensive
EJUL
ESGE
Healthcare
EJUL
ESGE
Utilities
EJUL
ESGE
Real Estate
EJUL
ESGE
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
EJUL vs. ESGE — Risk / Return Rank
EJUL
ESGE
EJUL vs. ESGE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Innovator Emerging Markets Power Buffer ETF - July (EJUL) and iShares ESG Aware MSCI EM ETF (ESGE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| EJUL | ESGE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.16 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +0.39 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.56 | 1.50 | +0.06 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 4.96 | 3.98 | +0.99 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 21.65 | 15.51 | +6.14 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| EJUL | ESGE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.59 | 2.75 | -0.16 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.28 | 0.36 | -0.08 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.27 | 0.50 | -0.23 |
Drawdowns
EJUL vs. ESGE - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum EJUL drawdown since its inception was -21.61%, smaller than the maximum ESGE drawdown of -41.07%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for EJUL and ESGE.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| EJUL | ESGE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -21.61% | -41.07% | +19.46% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -3.81% | -13.90% | +10.09% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -8.36% | -16.71% | +8.35% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -21.61% | -39.23% | +17.62% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.23% | -1.23% | +1.00% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -6.61% | -14.47% | +7.86% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 0.87% | 3.56% | -2.69% |
Volatility
EJUL vs. ESGE - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Innovator Emerging Markets Power Buffer ETF - July (EJUL) is 0.83%, while iShares ESG Aware MSCI EM ETF (ESGE) has a volatility of 8.56%. This indicates that EJUL experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than ESGE based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| EJUL | ESGE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 0.83% | 8.56% | -7.73% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 4.73% | 17.46% | -12.73% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 7.30% | 20.10% | -12.80% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 10.66% | 19.11% | -8.45% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 11.45% | 19.94% | -8.49% |
EJUL vs. ESGE - Expense Ratio Comparison
EJUL has a 0.89% expense ratio, which is higher than ESGE's 0.25% expense ratio.
Dividends
EJUL vs. ESGE - Dividend Comparison
EJUL has not paid dividends to shareholders, while ESGE's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.97%.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
EJUL Innovator Emerging Markets Power Buffer ETF - July | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.64% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
ESGE iShares ESG Aware MSCI EM ETF | 1.97% | 2.50% | 2.41% | 2.64% | 2.68% | 2.66% | 1.31% | 2.59% | 2.19% | 1.86% | 0.27% |
Frequently Asked Questions
EJUL and ESGE have a correlation of 0.87, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
ESGE has higher volatility (8.56%) compared to EJUL (0.83%). In terms of maximum drawdown, EJUL dropped -21.61% vs ESGE's -41.07%.
On 5-year performance, ESGE leads with 6.83% vs 3.01% for EJUL. On fees, ESGE is cheaper at 0.25% per year. On volatility, EJUL has been the lower-risk option at 0.83%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 5-year period, ESGE has performed better with a 6.83% return vs 3.01%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
ESGE is cheaper with a 0.25% expense ratio, compared with 0.89% for EJUL.
ESGE has the higher dividend yield at 1.97%, compared with 0.00% for EJUL.
EJUL is categorized as Defined Outcome, while ESGE is Emerging Markets Equities. EJUL tracks MSCI Emerging Markets Index, while ESGE tracks MSCI EM Extended ESG Focus Index. They also come from different issuers: Innovator and iShares. Their fees differ too: 0.89% for EJUL and 0.25% for ESGE.
ESGE currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.75 vs 2.59), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for EJUL and ESGE
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer