JANB vs. EBUF

Last updated Jun 24, 2026

JANB (Aptus January Buffer ETF) and EBUF (Innovator Emerging Markets 10 Buffer ETF - Quarterly) are both Defined Outcome funds. Both are actively managed. A 0.71 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. JANB charges 0.25%/yr vs 0.89%/yr for EBUF.

Performance

JANB vs. EBUF - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Aptus January Buffer ETF (JANB) and Innovator Emerging Markets 10 Buffer ETF - Quarterly (EBUF). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, JANB achieves a 5.32% return, which is significantly lower than EBUF's 10.32% return.

JANB

• 1D: -0.50%
• 1M: -0.15%
• YTD: 5.32%
• 6M: 5.27%
• 1Y: —
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

EBUF

• 1D: -0.39%
• 1M: 1.18%
• YTD: 10.32%
• 6M: 11.01%
• 1Y: 15.73%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

JANB vs. EBUF - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025
JANB Aptus January Buffer ETF	5.32%	2.76%
EBUF Innovator Emerging Markets 10 Buffer ETF - Quarterly	10.32%	2.33%

Correlation

The correlation between JANB and EBUF is 0.71, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.

	Correlation
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 14, 2025	0.71

Return for Risk

JANB vs. EBUF — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

JANB

Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

EBUF

EBUF Risk / Return Rank: 94
EBUF Sharpe Ratio Rank: 89
EBUF Sortino Ratio Rank: 94
EBUF Omega Ratio Rank: 95
EBUF Calmar Ratio Rank: 96
EBUF Martin Ratio Rank: 96

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

JANB vs. EBUF - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Aptus January Buffer ETF (JANB) and Innovator Emerging Markets 10 Buffer ETF - Quarterly (EBUF). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	JANB	EBUF	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	—	2.75	—
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	—	4.53	—
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	—	1.66	—
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	—	8.67	—
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	—	34.23	—

Drawdowns

JANB vs. EBUF - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum JANB drawdown since its inception was -6.52%, roughly equal to the maximum EBUF drawdown of -6.49%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for JANB and EBUF.

Drawdown Indicators

	JANB	EBUF	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-6.52%	-6.49%	-0.03%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	—	-1.82%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-0.97%	-0.39%	-0.58%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-1.10%	-0.49%	-0.61%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	—	0.46%	—

Volatility

Volatility by Period

	JANB	EBUF	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	—	1.99%	—
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	—	4.85%	—
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	7.51%	5.74%	+1.77%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	7.51%	6.66%	+0.85%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	7.51%	6.66%	+0.85%

JANB vs. EBUF - Expense Ratio Comparison

JANB has a 0.25% expense ratio, which is lower than EBUF's 0.89% expense ratio.

Dividends

JANB vs. EBUF - Dividend Comparison

Neither JANB nor EBUF has paid dividends to shareholders.

Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both JANB and EBUF in my portfolio?

JANB and EBUF have a correlation of 0.71, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which ETF is better, JANB or EBUF?

On fees, JANB is cheaper at 0.25% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF is cheaper, JANB or EBUF?

JANB is cheaper with a 0.25% expense ratio, compared with 0.89% for EBUF.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, JANB or EBUF?

JANB and EBUF have nearly identical dividend yields, around 0.00%.

What is the main difference between JANB and EBUF?

They also come from different issuers: Aptus Capital Advisors and Innovator. Their fees differ too: 0.25% for JANB and 0.89% for EBUF.