JANB vs. CBXA

Last updated Jun 24, 2026

JANB (Aptus January Buffer ETF) and CBXA (Calamos Bitcoin 90 Series Structured Alt Protection ETF - April) are both Defined Outcome funds. JANB is actively managed, while CBXA is passively managed. A 0.50 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. JANB charges 0.25%/yr vs 0.69%/yr for CBXA.

Performance

JANB vs. CBXA - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Aptus January Buffer ETF (JANB) and Calamos Bitcoin 90 Series Structured Alt Protection ETF - April (CBXA). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, JANB achieves a 5.32% return, which is significantly higher than CBXA's -21.17% return.

JANB

• 1D: -0.50%
• 1M: -0.15%
• YTD: 5.32%
• 6M: 5.27%
• 1Y: —
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

CBXA

• 1D: -1.11%
• 1M: -5.76%
• YTD: -21.17%
• 6M: -21.33%
• 1Y: -22.76%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

JANB vs. CBXA - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025
JANB Aptus January Buffer ETF	5.32%	2.76%
CBXA Calamos Bitcoin 90 Series Structured Alt Protection ETF - April	-21.17%	-7.62%

Correlation

The correlation between JANB and CBXA is 0.50, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.

	Correlation
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 14, 2025	0.50

Return for Risk

JANB vs. CBXA — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

JANB

Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

CBXA

CBXA Risk / Return Rank: 1
CBXA Sharpe Ratio Rank: 0
CBXA Sortino Ratio Rank: 1
CBXA Omega Ratio Rank: 1
CBXA Calmar Ratio Rank: 2
CBXA Martin Ratio Rank: 1

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

JANB vs. CBXA - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Aptus January Buffer ETF (JANB) and Calamos Bitcoin 90 Series Structured Alt Protection ETF - April (CBXA). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	JANB	CBXA	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	—	-1.26	—
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	—	-1.72	—
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	—	0.79	—
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	—	-0.79	—
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	—	-1.48	—

Drawdowns

JANB vs. CBXA - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum JANB drawdown since its inception was -6.52%, smaller than the maximum CBXA drawdown of -28.98%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for JANB and CBXA.

Drawdown Indicators

	JANB	CBXA	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-6.52%	-28.98%	+22.46%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	—	-28.98%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-0.97%	-28.23%	+27.26%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-1.10%	-9.48%	+8.38%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	—	15.43%	—

Volatility

Volatility by Period

	JANB	CBXA	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	—	4.12%	—
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	—	14.95%	—
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	7.51%	18.12%	-10.61%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	7.51%	17.01%	-9.50%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	7.51%	17.01%	-9.50%

JANB vs. CBXA - Expense Ratio Comparison

JANB has a 0.25% expense ratio, which is lower than CBXA's 0.69% expense ratio.

Dividends

JANB vs. CBXA - Dividend Comparison

JANB has not paid dividends to shareholders, while CBXA's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.50%.

Position	TTM	2025
CBXA Calamos Bitcoin 90 Series Structured Alt Protection ETF - April	2.50%	1.97%
JANB Aptus January Buffer ETF	0.00%	0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both JANB and CBXA in my portfolio?

JANB and CBXA have a correlation of 0.50, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which ETF is better, JANB or CBXA?

On fees, JANB is cheaper at 0.25% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF is cheaper, JANB or CBXA?

JANB is cheaper with a 0.25% expense ratio, compared with 0.69% for CBXA.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, JANB or CBXA?

CBXA has the higher dividend yield at 2.50%, compared with 0.00% for JANB.

What is the main difference between JANB and CBXA?

They also come from different issuers: Aptus Capital Advisors and Calamos. Their fees differ too: 0.25% for JANB and 0.69% for CBXA.