JAMRX vs. FTQGX
JAMRX (Janus Henderson Research Fund Class I) and FTQGX (Fidelity Focused Stock Fund) are both Large Cap Growth Equities funds. Over the past 10 years, JAMRX returned 17.29%/yr vs 19.75%/yr for FTQGX. Their correlation of 0.91 suggests significant overlap in exposure. JAMRX charges 0.64%/yr vs 0.86%/yr for FTQGX.
Performance
JAMRX vs. FTQGX - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, JAMRX achieves a 7.79% return, which is significantly lower than FTQGX's 32.07% return. Over the past 10 years, JAMRX has underperformed FTQGX with an annualized return of 17.29%, while FTQGX has yielded a comparatively higher 19.75% annualized return.
JAMRX
- 1D
- 1.56%
- 1M
- 2.59%
- YTD
- 7.79%
- 6M
- 8.13%
- 1Y
- 23.57%
- 3Y*
- 26.65%
- 5Y*
- 14.82%
- 10Y*
- 17.29%
FTQGX
- 1D
- 2.51%
- 1M
- 9.27%
- YTD
- 32.07%
- 6M
- 32.21%
- 1Y
- 56.90%
- 3Y*
- 30.72%
- 5Y*
- 17.35%
- 10Y*
- 19.75%
JAMRX vs. FTQGX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
JAMRX Janus Henderson Research Fund Class I | 7.79% | 18.32% | 41.65% | 43.02% | -30.03% | 20.08% | 32.67% | 35.28% | -2.84% | 25.89% |
FTQGX Fidelity Focused Stock Fund | 32.07% | 13.65% | 36.95% | 28.94% | -26.68% | 26.91% | 33.41% | 31.44% | 4.90% | 30.66% |
Correlation
The correlation between JAMRX and FTQGX is 0.86, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.86 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.90 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.92 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.93 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 12, 1996 | 0.91 |
The correlation between JAMRX and FTQGX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.86 to 0.93 - a consistent structural relationship.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
JAMRX vs. FTQGX — Risk / Return Rank
JAMRX
FTQGX
JAMRX vs. FTQGX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Janus Henderson Research Fund Class I (JAMRX) and Fidelity Focused Stock Fund (FTQGX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| JAMRX | FTQGX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -1.29 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -1.42 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.24 | 1.45 | -0.21 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.34 | 4.41 | -3.07 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 4.55 | 18.55 | -14.00 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
JAMRX vs. FTQGX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum JAMRX drawdown since its inception was -71.20%, which is greater than FTQGX's maximum drawdown of -61.29%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for JAMRX and FTQGX.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| JAMRX | FTQGX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -71.20% | -61.29% | -9.91% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -17.09% | -12.76% | -4.33% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -22.66% | -26.84% | +4.18% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -36.53% | -32.31% | -4.22% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -36.53% | -32.31% | -4.22% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -1.52% | 0.00% | -1.52% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -21.62% | -14.17% | -7.45% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 5.02% | 3.03% | +1.99% |
Volatility
JAMRX vs. FTQGX - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Janus Henderson Research Fund Class I (JAMRX) is 7.19%, while Fidelity Focused Stock Fund (FTQGX) has a volatility of 8.94%. This indicates that JAMRX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than FTQGX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| JAMRX | FTQGX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 7.19% | 8.94% | -1.75% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 13.83% | 17.12% | -3.29% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 17.02% | 21.33% | -4.31% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 22.30% | 21.96% | +0.34% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 21.46% | 21.71% | -0.25% |
JAMRX vs. FTQGX - Expense Ratio Comparison
JAMRX has a 0.64% expense ratio, which is lower than FTQGX's 0.86% expense ratio.
Dividends
JAMRX vs. FTQGX - Dividend Comparison
JAMRX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 11.11%, more than FTQGX's 9.42% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FTQGX Fidelity Focused Stock Fund | 9.42% | 12.44% | 9.94% | 0.61% | 7.96% | 13.53% | 11.41% | 5.07% | 14.71% | 5.89% | 1.08% | 5.91% |
JAMRX Janus Henderson Research Fund Class I | 11.11% | 11.98% | 10.22% | 2.88% | 0.28% | 13.02% | 2.91% | 10.27% | 10.92% | 8.17% | 5.60% | 9.61% |
Frequently Asked Questions
JAMRX and FTQGX have a correlation of 0.86, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
FTQGX has higher volatility (8.94%) compared to JAMRX (7.19%). In terms of maximum drawdown, JAMRX dropped -71.20% vs FTQGX's -61.29%.
FTQGX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.64 vs 1.35), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for JAMRX and FTQGX
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer