PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
JAKVX vs. ABRSX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

JAKVX vs. ABRSX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in John Hancock Disciplined Value Global Long/Short Fund Class R6 (JAKVX) and ABR 50/50 Volatility Fund (ABRSX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, JAKVX achieves a 12.93% return, which is significantly higher than ABRSX's 2.29% return.


JAKVX

1D
-0.49%
1M
1.00%
YTD
12.93%
6M
13.88%
1Y
26.35%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

ABRSX

1D
-0.56%
1M
5.56%
YTD
2.29%
6M
4.49%
1Y
26.92%
3Y*
11.33%
5Y*
6.24%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

JAKVX vs. ABRSX - Yearly Performance Comparison


Correlation

The correlation between JAKVX and ABRSX is 0.46, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.46

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 29, 2025

0.41

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

JAKVX vs. ABRSX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

JAKVX
JAKVX Risk / Return Rank: 9494
Overall Rank
JAKVX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9797
Sharpe Ratio Rank
JAKVX Sortino Ratio Rank: 9595
Sortino Ratio Rank
JAKVX Omega Ratio Rank: 9393
Omega Ratio Rank
JAKVX Calmar Ratio Rank: 9393
Calmar Ratio Rank
JAKVX Martin Ratio Rank: 9191
Martin Ratio Rank

ABRSX
ABRSX Risk / Return Rank: 2121
Overall Rank
ABRSX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2020
Sharpe Ratio Rank
ABRSX Sortino Ratio Rank: 1818
Sortino Ratio Rank
ABRSX Omega Ratio Rank: 2424
Omega Ratio Rank
ABRSX Calmar Ratio Rank: 1717
Calmar Ratio Rank
ABRSX Martin Ratio Rank: 2424
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

JAKVX vs. ABRSX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for John Hancock Disciplined Value Global Long/Short Fund Class R6 (JAKVX) and ABR 50/50 Volatility Fund (ABRSX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


JAKVXABRSXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+2.35

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+3.38

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.72

1.25

+0.47

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

5.22

1.43

+3.79

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

18.35

5.69

+12.66

JAKVX vs. ABRSX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current JAKVX Sharpe Ratio is 3.61, which is higher than the ABRSX Sharpe Ratio of 1.26. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of JAKVX and ABRSX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


JAKVXABRSXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

3.61

1.26

+2.35

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.23

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

4.00

0.17

+3.83

Drawdowns

JAKVX vs. ABRSX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum JAKVX drawdown since its inception was -5.16%, smaller than the maximum ABRSX drawdown of -49.78%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for JAKVX and ABRSX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


JAKVXABRSXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-5.16%

-49.78%

+44.62%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-5.16%

-19.12%

+13.96%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-27.83%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-44.57%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.71%

-0.56%

-0.15%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-0.80%

-15.95%

+15.15%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.47%

4.81%

-3.34%

Volatility

JAKVX vs. ABRSX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for John Hancock Disciplined Value Global Long/Short Fund Class R6 (JAKVX) is 2.50%, while ABR 50/50 Volatility Fund (ABRSX) has a volatility of 3.06%. This indicates that JAKVX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than ABRSX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


JAKVXABRSXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

2.50%

3.06%

-0.56%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

5.91%

17.49%

-11.58%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

7.48%

21.82%

-14.34%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

7.33%

27.37%

-20.04%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

7.33%

36.21%

-28.88%

JAKVX vs. ABRSX - Expense Ratio Comparison

JAKVX has a 1.54% expense ratio, which is lower than ABRSX's 2.00% expense ratio.


Dividends

JAKVX vs. ABRSX - Dividend Comparison

JAKVX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 7.50%, more than ABRSX's 0.62% yield.


PositionTTM202520242023202220212020201920182017
ABRSX
ABR 50/50 Volatility Fund
0.62%0.63%1.04%0.00%0.00%47.19%0.00%10.50%12.88%0.99%
JAKVX
John Hancock Disciplined Value Global Long/Short Fund Class R6
7.50%8.47%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


JAKVX and ABRSX have a correlation of 0.46, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

ABRSX has higher volatility (3.06%) compared to JAKVX (2.50%). In terms of maximum drawdown, JAKVX dropped -5.16% vs ABRSX's -49.78%.

JAKVX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (3.61 vs 1.26), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for JAKVX and ABRSX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer