PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
JAGTX vs. JGLTX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

JAGTX vs. JGLTX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Janus Global Technology and Innovation Fund (JAGTX) and Janus Henderson VIT Global Technology and Innovation Portfolio (JGLTX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

The year-to-date returns for both stocks are quite close, with JAGTX having a 33.82% return and JGLTX slightly lower at 33.79%. Both investments have delivered pretty close results over the past 10 years, with JAGTX having a 25.69% annualized return and JGLTX not far behind at 24.75%.


JAGTX

1D
-0.99%
1M
15.96%
YTD
33.82%
6M
33.68%
1Y
57.13%
3Y*
41.39%
5Y*
21.13%
10Y*
25.69%

JGLTX

1D
-0.99%
1M
16.01%
YTD
33.79%
6M
33.57%
1Y
57.29%
3Y*
36.57%
5Y*
19.20%
10Y*
24.75%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

JAGTX vs. JGLTX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
JAGTX
Janus Global Technology and Innovation Fund
33.82%24.86%47.04%55.16%-37.69%17.39%51.00%45.08%0.78%44.62%
JGLTX
Janus Henderson VIT Global Technology and Innovation Portfolio
33.79%25.19%32.10%54.55%-36.42%18.28%50.42%45.29%1.17%45.17%

Correlation

The correlation between JAGTX and JGLTX is 1.00 - these two move nearly in lockstep. At this level, holding both provides almost no diversification benefit. If you already own one, adding the other does little to reduce portfolio risk.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.00

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.99

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

1.00

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

1.00

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 19, 2000

0.99

The correlation between JAGTX and JGLTX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.99 to 1.00 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

JAGTX vs. JGLTX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

JAGTX
JAGTX Risk / Return Rank: 7575
Overall Rank
JAGTX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8787
Sharpe Ratio Rank
JAGTX Sortino Ratio Rank: 7171
Sortino Ratio Rank
JAGTX Omega Ratio Rank: 7070
Omega Ratio Rank
JAGTX Calmar Ratio Rank: 8181
Calmar Ratio Rank
JAGTX Martin Ratio Rank: 6565
Martin Ratio Rank

JGLTX
JGLTX Risk / Return Rank: 7676
Overall Rank
JGLTX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8787
Sharpe Ratio Rank
JGLTX Sortino Ratio Rank: 7373
Sortino Ratio Rank
JGLTX Omega Ratio Rank: 7171
Omega Ratio Rank
JGLTX Calmar Ratio Rank: 8181
Calmar Ratio Rank
JGLTX Martin Ratio Rank: 6666
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

JAGTX vs. JGLTX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Janus Global Technology and Innovation Fund (JAGTX) and Janus Henderson VIT Global Technology and Innovation Portfolio (JGLTX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


JAGTXJGLTXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.03

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.04

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.47

1.47

-0.01

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

3.69

3.74

-0.04

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

12.64

12.80

-0.16

JAGTX vs. JGLTX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current JAGTX Sharpe Ratio is 2.85, which is comparable to the JGLTX Sharpe Ratio of 2.88. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of JAGTX and JGLTX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


JAGTXJGLTXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.85

2.88

-0.03

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.79

0.74

+0.05

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

1.04

1.01

+0.03

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.51

0.36

+0.15

Drawdowns

JAGTX vs. JGLTX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum JAGTX drawdown since its inception was -84.57%, roughly equal to the maximum JGLTX drawdown of -81.78%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for JAGTX and JGLTX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


JAGTXJGLTXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-84.57%

-81.78%

-2.79%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-15.95%

-15.81%

-0.14%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-23.94%

-23.72%

-0.22%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-46.52%

-45.18%

-1.34%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-46.52%

-45.18%

-1.34%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.99%

-0.99%

0.00%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-39.82%

-36.59%

-3.23%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

4.65%

4.60%

+0.05%

Volatility

JAGTX vs. JGLTX - Volatility Comparison

Janus Global Technology and Innovation Fund (JAGTX) and Janus Henderson VIT Global Technology and Innovation Portfolio (JGLTX) have volatilities of 6.92% and 6.92%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


JAGTXJGLTXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

6.92%

6.92%

0.00%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

17.04%

16.88%

+0.16%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

20.70%

20.52%

+0.18%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

26.82%

26.09%

+0.73%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

24.78%

24.49%

+0.29%

JAGTX vs. JGLTX - Expense Ratio Comparison

JAGTX has a 0.91% expense ratio, which is higher than JGLTX's 0.72% expense ratio.


Dividends

JAGTX vs. JGLTX - Dividend Comparison

JAGTX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 10.23%, more than JGLTX's 6.71% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
JAGTX
Janus Global Technology and Innovation Fund
10.23%13.69%23.66%0.78%0.00%16.05%9.00%8.62%6.56%7.50%4.85%8.12%
JGLTX
Janus Henderson VIT Global Technology and Innovation Portfolio
6.71%8.98%0.00%0.00%26.96%14.48%7.71%6.81%4.95%5.68%3.71%16.11%

Frequently Asked Questions


With a correlation of 1.00, JAGTX and JGLTX move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

JGLTX has higher volatility (6.92%) compared to JAGTX (6.92%). In terms of maximum drawdown, JAGTX dropped -84.57% vs JGLTX's -81.78%.

JGLTX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.88 vs 2.85), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for JAGTX and JGLTX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer