JAGLX vs. FBTTX
Compare and contrast key facts about Janus Henderson Global Life Sciences Fund Class T (JAGLX) and Fidelity Advisor Biotechnology Fund Class M (FBTTX).
JAGLX is an actively managed fund by Janus Henderson. It was launched on Dec 31, 1998. FBTTX is managed by Fidelity. It was launched on Dec 27, 2000.
Performance
JAGLX vs. FBTTX - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
JAGLX vs. FBTTX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
JAGLX Janus Henderson Global Life Sciences Fund Class T | -3.75% | 24.72% | 8.50% | 7.41% | -2.79% | 6.66% | 25.52% | 29.12% | 4.05% | 22.13% |
FBTTX Fidelity Advisor Biotechnology Fund Class M | 2.18% | 39.21% | 5.08% | 10.43% | -8.22% | -3.35% | 31.82% | 25.39% | -4.19% | 25.37% |
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, JAGLX achieves a -3.75% return, which is significantly lower than FBTTX's 2.18% return. Both investments have delivered pretty close results over the past 10 years, with JAGLX having a 11.55% annualized return and FBTTX not far behind at 11.54%.
JAGLX
- 1D
- 3.08%
- 1M
- -5.56%
- YTD
- -3.75%
- 6M
- 11.82%
- 1Y
- 21.58%
- 3Y*
- 12.33%
- 5Y*
- 8.24%
- 10Y*
- 11.55%
FBTTX
- 1D
- 5.09%
- 1M
- -0.77%
- YTD
- 2.18%
- 6M
- 15.39%
- 1Y
- 55.03%
- 3Y*
- 20.14%
- 5Y*
- 8.63%
- 10Y*
- 11.54%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
JAGLX vs. FBTTX - Expense Ratio Comparison
JAGLX has a 0.92% expense ratio, which is lower than FBTTX's 1.28% expense ratio.
Return for Risk
JAGLX vs. FBTTX — Risk / Return Rank
JAGLX
FBTTX
JAGLX vs. FBTTX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Janus Henderson Global Life Sciences Fund Class T (JAGLX) and Fidelity Advisor Biotechnology Fund Class M (FBTTX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| JAGLX | FBTTX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 1.06 | 1.92 | -0.86 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 1.53 | 2.52 | -0.99 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.20 | 1.32 | -0.12 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.78 | 3.13 | -1.35 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 4.92 | 12.48 | -7.56 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| JAGLX | FBTTX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.06 | 1.92 | -0.86 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.53 | 0.37 | +0.15 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.66 | 0.47 | +0.19 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.58 | 0.30 | +0.28 |
Correlation
The correlation between JAGLX and FBTTX is 0.87, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.
Dividends
JAGLX vs. FBTTX - Dividend Comparison
JAGLX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.70%, more than FBTTX's 1.50% yield.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
JAGLX Janus Henderson Global Life Sciences Fund Class T | 4.70% | 4.53% | 10.98% | 4.22% | 0.14% | 9.78% | 7.75% | 6.17% | 13.38% | 0.89% | 1.13% | 9.09% |
FBTTX Fidelity Advisor Biotechnology Fund Class M | 1.50% | 1.53% | 6.41% | 0.93% | 0.00% | 21.60% | 8.79% | 7.10% | 2.64% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 5.42% |
Drawdowns
JAGLX vs. FBTTX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum JAGLX drawdown since its inception was -58.96%, smaller than the maximum FBTTX drawdown of -63.75%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for JAGLX and FBTTX.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| JAGLX | FBTTX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -58.96% | -63.75% | +4.79% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -9.71% | -13.58% | +3.87% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -22.25% | -36.64% | +14.39% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -27.38% | -39.04% | +11.66% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -6.64% | -2.61% | -4.03% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -17.51% | -21.95% | +4.44% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 3.63% | 3.72% | -0.09% |
Volatility
JAGLX vs. FBTTX - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Janus Henderson Global Life Sciences Fund Class T (JAGLX) is 5.99%, while Fidelity Advisor Biotechnology Fund Class M (FBTTX) has a volatility of 9.37%. This indicates that JAGLX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than FBTTX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| JAGLX | FBTTX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 5.99% | 9.37% | -3.38% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 10.63% | 17.02% | -6.39% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 17.86% | 25.99% | -8.13% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 15.76% | 23.31% | -7.55% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 17.45% | 24.58% | -7.13% |