JAFLX vs. TIBDX
JAFLX (Janus Henderson VIT Flexible Bond Portfolio) and TIBDX (TIAA-CREF Core Bond Fund) are both Intermediate Core-Plus Bond funds. Over the past 10 years, JAFLX returned 1.95%/yr vs 1.91%/yr for TIBDX. Their correlation of 0.91 suggests significant overlap in exposure. JAFLX charges 0.57%/yr vs 0.29%/yr for TIBDX.
Performance
JAFLX vs. TIBDX - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, JAFLX achieves a 0.15% return, which is significantly lower than TIBDX's 0.34% return. Both investments have delivered pretty close results over the past 10 years, with JAFLX having a 1.95% annualized return and TIBDX not far behind at 1.91%.
JAFLX
- 1D
- -0.31%
- 1M
- 0.55%
- YTD
- 0.15%
- 6M
- 0.35%
- 1Y
- 4.09%
- 3Y*
- 4.27%
- 5Y*
- 0.12%
- 10Y*
- 1.95%
TIBDX
- 1D
- -0.33%
- 1M
- 0.60%
- YTD
- 0.34%
- 6M
- 0.71%
- 1Y
- 4.87%
- 3Y*
- 4.18%
- 5Y*
- 0.09%
- 10Y*
- 1.91%
JAFLX vs. TIBDX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
JAFLX Janus Henderson VIT Flexible Bond Portfolio | 0.15% | 7.41% | 1.96% | 5.52% | -13.64% | -0.89% | 10.48% | 9.57% | -1.00% | 3.62% |
TIBDX TIAA-CREF Core Bond Fund | 0.34% | 7.38% | 1.95% | 5.63% | -13.68% | -0.95% | 8.10% | 9.57% | -0.64% | 4.48% |
Correlation
The correlation between JAFLX and TIBDX is 0.91, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.91 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.94 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.95 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.93 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 14, 1999 | 0.91 |
The correlation between JAFLX and TIBDX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.91 to 0.95 - a consistent structural relationship.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
JAFLX vs. TIBDX — Risk / Return Rank
JAFLX
TIBDX
JAFLX vs. TIBDX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Janus Henderson VIT Flexible Bond Portfolio (JAFLX) and TIAA-CREF Core Bond Fund (TIBDX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| JAFLX | TIBDX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.13 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.21 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.22 | 1.24 | -0.02 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.54 | 1.72 | -0.18 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 4.45 | 5.09 | -0.65 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
JAFLX vs. TIBDX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum JAFLX drawdown since its inception was -18.06%, roughly equal to the maximum TIBDX drawdown of -18.82%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for JAFLX and TIBDX.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| JAFLX | TIBDX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -18.06% | -18.82% | +0.76% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -2.87% | -2.98% | +0.11% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -6.51% | -6.29% | -0.22% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -18.06% | -18.82% | +0.76% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -18.06% | -18.82% | +0.76% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -1.64% | -1.54% | -0.10% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -2.12% | -2.30% | +0.18% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 0.99% | 1.01% | -0.02% |
Volatility
JAFLX vs. TIBDX - Volatility Comparison
Janus Henderson VIT Flexible Bond Portfolio (JAFLX) and TIAA-CREF Core Bond Fund (TIBDX) have volatilities of 1.12% and 1.10%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| JAFLX | TIBDX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 1.12% | 1.10% | +0.02% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 2.79% | 2.95% | -0.16% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 3.69% | 3.88% | -0.19% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 6.07% | 5.64% | +0.43% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 4.95% | 4.74% | +0.21% |
JAFLX vs. TIBDX - Expense Ratio Comparison
JAFLX has a 0.57% expense ratio, which is higher than TIBDX's 0.29% expense ratio.
Dividends
JAFLX vs. TIBDX - Dividend Comparison
JAFLX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 5.48%, more than TIBDX's 4.46% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
JAFLX Janus Henderson VIT Flexible Bond Portfolio | 5.48% | 5.34% | 5.09% | 4.27% | 4.75% | 4.84% | 2.87% | 3.31% | 3.21% | 2.98% | 2.92% | 2.90% |
TIBDX TIAA-CREF Core Bond Fund | 4.46% | 4.34% | 3.60% | 3.22% | 2.44% | 2.39% | 4.45% | 3.09% | 2.88% | 2.93% | 3.80% | 4.68% |
Frequently Asked Questions
With a correlation of 0.91, JAFLX and TIBDX move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.
JAFLX has higher volatility (1.12%) compared to TIBDX (1.10%). In terms of maximum drawdown, JAFLX dropped -18.06% vs TIBDX's -18.82%.
TIBDX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.33 vs 1.20), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for JAFLX and TIBDX
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer