PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
JADE vs. BAMU
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

JADE vs. BAMU - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in JPMorgan Active Developing Markets Equity ETF (JADE) and Brookstone Ultra-Short Bond ETF (BAMU). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, JADE achieves a 28.34% return, which is significantly higher than BAMU's 1.06% return.


JADE

1D
-1.18%
1M
8.60%
YTD
28.34%
6M
31.12%
1Y
59.71%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

BAMU

1D
0.02%
1M
0.20%
YTD
1.06%
6M
1.25%
1Y
2.93%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

JADE vs. BAMU - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024
JADE
JPMorgan Active Developing Markets Equity ETF
28.34%38.50%-2.30%
BAMU
Brookstone Ultra-Short Bond ETF
1.06%3.21%2.61%

Correlation

The correlation between JADE and BAMU is -0.14, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

-0.14

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since May 20, 2024

-0.08

JADE vs. BAMU - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
JADE
BAMU

Technology

37.1%

-

Financial Services

22.3%
98.8%

Consumer Cyclical

11.4%

-

Industrials

7.8%

-

Communication Services

7.2%

-

Energy

4.7%

-

Basic Materials

3.6%

-

Consumer Defensive

2.3%

-

Utilities

2.1%

-

Real Estate

0.9%

-

Healthcare

0.6%

-

Technology

JADE
37.1%
BAMU

-

Financial Services

JADE
22.3%
BAMU
98.8%

Consumer Cyclical

JADE
11.4%
BAMU

-

Industrials

JADE
7.8%
BAMU

-

Communication Services

JADE
7.2%
BAMU

-

Energy

JADE
4.7%
BAMU

-

Basic Materials

JADE
3.6%
BAMU

-

Consumer Defensive

JADE
2.3%
BAMU

-

Utilities

JADE
2.1%
BAMU

-

Real Estate

JADE
0.9%
BAMU

-

Healthcare

JADE
0.6%
BAMU

-

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

JADE vs. BAMU — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

JADE
JADE Risk / Return Rank: 8888
Overall Rank
JADE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9090
Sharpe Ratio Rank
JADE Sortino Ratio Rank: 8787
Sortino Ratio Rank
JADE Omega Ratio Rank: 8989
Omega Ratio Rank
JADE Calmar Ratio Rank: 8585
Calmar Ratio Rank
JADE Martin Ratio Rank: 8888
Martin Ratio Rank

BAMU
BAMU Risk / Return Rank: 9898
Overall Rank
BAMU Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9797
Sharpe Ratio Rank
BAMU Sortino Ratio Rank: 9898
Sortino Ratio Rank
BAMU Omega Ratio Rank: 9898
Omega Ratio Rank
BAMU Calmar Ratio Rank: 9999
Calmar Ratio Rank
BAMU Martin Ratio Rank: 9999
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

JADE vs. BAMU - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for JPMorgan Active Developing Markets Equity ETF (JADE) and Brookstone Ultra-Short Bond ETF (BAMU). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


JADEBAMUDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-1.86

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-4.82

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.57

2.41

-0.84

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

4.69

24.89

-20.20

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

19.53

97.89

-78.36

JADE vs. BAMU - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current JADE Sharpe Ratio is 3.12, which is lower than the BAMU Sharpe Ratio of 4.98. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of JADE and BAMU, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


JADEBAMUDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

3.12

4.98

-1.86

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

1.62

4.14

-2.53

Drawdowns

JADE vs. BAMU - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum JADE drawdown since its inception was -16.71%, which is greater than BAMU's maximum drawdown of -0.36%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for JADE and BAMU.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


JADEBAMUDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-16.71%

-0.36%

-16.35%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-12.80%

-0.12%

-12.68%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-1.18%

0.00%

-1.18%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-3.22%

-0.02%

-3.20%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.07%

0.03%

+3.04%

Volatility

JADE vs. BAMU - Volatility Comparison

JPMorgan Active Developing Markets Equity ETF (JADE) has a higher volatility of 8.13% compared to Brookstone Ultra-Short Bond ETF (BAMU) at 0.07%. This indicates that JADE's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than BAMU based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


JADEBAMUDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

8.13%

0.07%

+8.06%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

16.48%

0.43%

+16.05%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

19.25%

0.59%

+18.66%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

19.39%

0.87%

+18.52%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

19.39%

0.87%

+18.52%

JADE vs. BAMU - Expense Ratio Comparison

JADE has a 0.65% expense ratio, which is lower than BAMU's 1.09% expense ratio.


Dividends

JADE vs. BAMU - Dividend Comparison

JADE's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.78%, less than BAMU's 3.06% yield.


PositionTTM202520242023
BAMU
Brookstone Ultra-Short Bond ETF
3.06%3.20%3.97%0.84%
JADE
JPMorgan Active Developing Markets Equity ETF
1.78%2.29%1.49%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


JADE and BAMU have a correlation of -0.14, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

JADE has higher volatility (8.13%) compared to BAMU (0.07%). In terms of maximum drawdown, JADE dropped -16.71% vs BAMU's -0.36%.

On 1-year performance, JADE leads with 59.71% vs 2.93% for BAMU. On fees, JADE is cheaper at 0.65% per year. On volatility, BAMU has been the lower-risk option at 0.07%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 1-year period, JADE has performed better with a 59.71% return vs 2.93%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

JADE is cheaper with a 0.65% expense ratio, compared with 1.09% for BAMU.

BAMU has the higher dividend yield at 3.06%, compared with 1.78% for JADE.

JADE is categorized as Emerging Markets Diversified, while BAMU is Ultrashort Bond. They also come from different issuers: JPMorgan and Brookstone. Their fees differ too: 0.65% for JADE and 1.09% for BAMU.

BAMU currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (4.98 vs 3.12), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for JADE and BAMU

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer