PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
JADE vs. EMEQ
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

JADE vs. EMEQ - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in JPMorgan Active Developing Markets Equity ETF (JADE) and Nomura Focused Emerging Markets Equity ETF (EMEQ). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, JADE achieves a 29.88% return, which is significantly lower than EMEQ's 78.09% return.


JADE

1D
0.98%
1M
9.71%
YTD
29.88%
6M
32.69%
1Y
61.99%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

EMEQ

1D
-1.28%
1M
23.68%
YTD
78.09%
6M
88.05%
1Y
166.45%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

JADE vs. EMEQ - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024
JADE
JPMorgan Active Developing Markets Equity ETF
29.88%38.50%0.29%
EMEQ
Nomura Focused Emerging Markets Equity ETF
78.09%69.78%-1.16%

Correlation

The correlation between JADE and EMEQ is 0.88, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.88

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 6, 2024

0.89

The correlation between JADE and EMEQ has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.88 to 0.89 - a consistent structural relationship.

JADE vs. EMEQ - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
JADE
EMEQ

Technology

37.1%
56.6%

Financial Services

22.3%
11.1%

Consumer Cyclical

11.4%
8.2%

Industrials

7.8%
5.8%

Communication Services

7.2%
5.7%

Energy

4.7%
7.0%

Basic Materials

3.6%
1.8%

Consumer Defensive

2.3%
2.9%

Utilities

2.1%

-

Real Estate

0.9%

-

Healthcare

0.6%
1.0%

Technology

JADE
37.1%
EMEQ
56.6%

Financial Services

JADE
22.3%
EMEQ
11.1%

Consumer Cyclical

JADE
11.4%
EMEQ
8.2%

Industrials

JADE
7.8%
EMEQ
5.8%

Communication Services

JADE
7.2%
EMEQ
5.7%

Energy

JADE
4.7%
EMEQ
7.0%

Basic Materials

JADE
3.6%
EMEQ
1.8%

Consumer Defensive

JADE
2.3%
EMEQ
2.9%

Utilities

JADE
2.1%
EMEQ

-

Real Estate

JADE
0.9%
EMEQ

-

Healthcare

JADE
0.6%
EMEQ
1.0%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

JADE vs. EMEQ — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

JADE
JADE Risk / Return Rank: 8989
Overall Rank
JADE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9191
Sharpe Ratio Rank
JADE Sortino Ratio Rank: 8888
Sortino Ratio Rank
JADE Omega Ratio Rank: 9090
Omega Ratio Rank
JADE Calmar Ratio Rank: 8686
Calmar Ratio Rank
JADE Martin Ratio Rank: 8989
Martin Ratio Rank

EMEQ
EMEQ Risk / Return Rank: 9696
Overall Rank
EMEQ Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9898
Sharpe Ratio Rank
EMEQ Sortino Ratio Rank: 9595
Sortino Ratio Rank
EMEQ Omega Ratio Rank: 9595
Omega Ratio Rank
EMEQ Calmar Ratio Rank: 9696
Calmar Ratio Rank
EMEQ Martin Ratio Rank: 9696
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

JADE vs. EMEQ - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for JPMorgan Active Developing Markets Equity ETF (JADE) and Nomura Focused Emerging Markets Equity ETF (EMEQ). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


JADEEMEQDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

3.25

5.22

-1.97

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

4.08

5.25

-1.17

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.59

1.75

-0.16

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

4.90

9.35

-4.45

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

20.45

37.42

-16.97

JADE vs. EMEQ - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current JADE Sharpe Ratio is 3.25, which is lower than the EMEQ Sharpe Ratio of 5.22. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of JADE and EMEQ, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


JADEEMEQDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

3.25

5.22

-1.97

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

1.66

2.95

-1.29

Drawdowns

JADE vs. EMEQ - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum JADE drawdown since its inception was -16.71%, smaller than the maximum EMEQ drawdown of -19.99%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for JADE and EMEQ.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


JADEEMEQDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-16.71%

-19.99%

+3.28%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-12.80%

-17.91%

+5.11%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

0.00%

-1.28%

+1.28%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-3.23%

-3.97%

+0.74%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.07%

4.47%

-1.40%

Volatility

JADE vs. EMEQ - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for JPMorgan Active Developing Markets Equity ETF (JADE) is 7.98%, while Nomura Focused Emerging Markets Equity ETF (EMEQ) has a volatility of 15.18%. This indicates that JADE experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than EMEQ based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


JADEEMEQDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

7.98%

15.18%

-7.20%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

16.42%

28.51%

-12.09%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

19.20%

32.10%

-12.90%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

19.39%

29.97%

-10.58%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

19.39%

29.97%

-10.58%

JADE vs. EMEQ - Expense Ratio Comparison

JADE has a 0.65% expense ratio, which is lower than EMEQ's 0.86% expense ratio.


Dividends

JADE vs. EMEQ - Dividend Comparison

JADE's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.76%, more than EMEQ's 1.55% yield.


Frequently Asked Questions


JADE and EMEQ have a correlation of 0.88, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

EMEQ has higher volatility (15.18%) compared to JADE (7.98%). In terms of maximum drawdown, JADE dropped -16.71% vs EMEQ's -19.99%.

On 1-year performance, EMEQ leads with 166.45% vs 61.99% for JADE. On fees, JADE is cheaper at 0.65% per year. On volatility, JADE has been the lower-risk option at 7.98%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 1-year period, EMEQ has performed better with a 166.45% return vs 61.99%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

JADE is cheaper with a 0.65% expense ratio, compared with 0.86% for EMEQ.

JADE has the higher dividend yield at 1.76%, compared with 1.55% for EMEQ.

They also come from different issuers: JPMorgan and Nomura. Their fees differ too: 0.65% for JADE and 0.86% for EMEQ.

EMEQ currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (5.22 vs 3.25), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for JADE and EMEQ

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer