JACNX vs. JNVSX
JACNX (Janus Henderson Contrarian Fund) and JNVSX (Jensen Quality Value Fund) are both Mid Cap Blend Equities funds. Over the past 10 years, JACNX returned 14.67%/yr vs 11.17%/yr for JNVSX. Their correlation of 0.80 suggests significant overlap in exposure. JACNX charges 0.90%/yr vs 1.05%/yr for JNVSX.
Performance
JACNX vs. JNVSX - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, JACNX achieves a 21.18% return, which is significantly higher than JNVSX's -1.11% return. Over the past 10 years, JACNX has outperformed JNVSX with an annualized return of 14.67%, while JNVSX has yielded a comparatively lower 11.17% annualized return.
JACNX
- 1D
- 0.03%
- 1M
- 5.52%
- YTD
- 21.18%
- 6M
- 18.79%
- 1Y
- 28.18%
- 3Y*
- 18.90%
- 5Y*
- 8.33%
- 10Y*
- 14.67%
JNVSX
- 1D
- 1.50%
- 1M
- -0.32%
- YTD
- -1.11%
- 6M
- -2.18%
- 1Y
- -2.31%
- 3Y*
- 4.99%
- 5Y*
- 8.08%
- 10Y*
- 11.17%
JACNX vs. JNVSX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
JACNX Janus Henderson Contrarian Fund | 21.18% | 7.34% | 18.44% | 21.58% | -21.54% | 20.79% | 27.88% | 43.19% | -4.08% | 5.00% |
JNVSX Jensen Quality Value Fund | -1.11% | -2.58% | 9.40% | 18.58% | -15.83% | 60.71% | 14.79% | 27.58% | -9.03% | 15.08% |
Correlation
The correlation between JACNX and JNVSX is 0.44, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.44 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.64 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.74 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.78 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 31, 2010 | 0.80 |
Over the past year, the correlation between JACNX and JNVSX has dropped to 0.44 - well below their long-term average of 0.80, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
JACNX vs. JNVSX — Risk / Return Rank
JACNX
JNVSX
JACNX vs. JNVSX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Janus Henderson Contrarian Fund (JACNX) and Jensen Quality Value Fund (JNVSX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| JACNX | JNVSX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +1.57 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +2.13 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.23 | 0.97 | +0.26 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.92 | -0.31 | +2.24 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 5.98 | -0.59 | +6.56 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
JACNX vs. JNVSX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum JACNX drawdown since its inception was -66.81%, which is greater than JNVSX's maximum drawdown of -34.52%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for JACNX and JNVSX.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| JACNX | JNVSX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -66.81% | -34.52% | -32.29% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -14.27% | -10.42% | -3.85% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -23.92% | -17.43% | -6.49% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -30.32% | -24.56% | -5.76% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -40.25% | -34.52% | -5.73% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -2.49% | -9.54% | +7.05% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -14.64% | -5.19% | -9.45% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 4.58% | 5.56% | -0.98% |
Volatility
JACNX vs. JNVSX - Volatility Comparison
Janus Henderson Contrarian Fund (JACNX) has a higher volatility of 8.47% compared to Jensen Quality Value Fund (JNVSX) at 3.47%. This indicates that JACNX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than JNVSX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| JACNX | JNVSX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 8.47% | 3.47% | +5.00% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 17.01% | 9.53% | +7.48% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 21.06% | 12.85% | +8.21% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 22.29% | 20.48% | +1.81% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 21.82% | 19.23% | +2.59% |
JACNX vs. JNVSX - Expense Ratio Comparison
JACNX has a 0.90% expense ratio, which is lower than JNVSX's 1.05% expense ratio.
Dividends
JACNX vs. JNVSX - Dividend Comparison
JACNX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 9.16%, less than JNVSX's 11.38% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
JACNX Janus Henderson Contrarian Fund | 9.16% | 11.10% | 11.53% | 7.13% | 0.53% | 9.63% | 1.69% | 11.74% | 8.86% | 7.77% | 3.52% | 2.71% |
JNVSX Jensen Quality Value Fund | 11.38% | 11.31% | 6.15% | 0.56% | 2.69% | 22.40% | 1.27% | 5.13% | 6.15% | 4.14% | 1.34% | 17.62% |
Frequently Asked Questions
JACNX and JNVSX have a correlation of 0.44, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
JACNX has higher volatility (8.47%) compared to JNVSX (3.47%). In terms of maximum drawdown, JACNX dropped -66.81% vs JNVSX's -34.52%.
JACNX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.31 vs -0.25), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for JACNX and JNVSX
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer