JABS vs. SCHO

Last updated Jun 4, 2026

JABS (Janus Henderson Asset-Backed Securities ETF) and SCHO (Schwab Short-Term U.S. Treasury ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - JABS is a Short-Term Bond fund actively managed by Janus Henderson, while SCHO is a Government Bonds fund tracking the Bloomberg U.S. Treasury 1-3 Year Index. JABS is actively managed, while SCHO is passively managed. At a 0.28 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. JABS charges 0.33%/yr vs 0.03%/yr for SCHO.

Performance

JABS vs. SCHO - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Janus Henderson Asset-Backed Securities ETF (JABS) and Schwab Short-Term U.S. Treasury ETF (SCHO). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, JABS achieves a 1.29% return, which is significantly higher than SCHO's 0.42% return.

JABS

• 1D: -0.12%
• 1M: 0.33%
• YTD: 1.29%
• 6M: 1.94%
• 1Y: —
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

SCHO

• 1D: -0.04%
• 1M: 0.06%
• YTD: 0.42%
• 6M: 0.78%
• 1Y: 3.39%
• 3Y*: 4.15%
• 5Y*: 1.80%
• 10Y*: 1.71%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

JABS vs. SCHO - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025
JABS Janus Henderson Asset-Backed Securities ETF	1.29%	2.49%
SCHO Schwab Short-Term U.S. Treasury ETF	0.42%	2.29%

Correlation

The correlation between JABS and SCHO is 0.28, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.

	Correlation
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 24, 2025	0.28

Return for Risk

JABS vs. SCHO — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

SCHO

SCHO Risk / Return Rank: 81
SCHO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 74
SCHO Sortino Ratio Rank: 88
SCHO Omega Ratio Rank: 81
SCHO Calmar Ratio Rank: 77
SCHO Martin Ratio Rank: 83

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

JABS vs. SCHO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Janus Henderson Asset-Backed Securities ETF (JABS) and Schwab Short-Term U.S. Treasury ETF (SCHO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	JABS	SCHO	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	—	2.48	—
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	—	0.91	—
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	—	1.10	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	2.23	0.99	+1.23

Drawdowns

JABS vs. SCHO - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum JABS drawdown since its inception was -0.97%, smaller than the maximum SCHO drawdown of -5.69%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for JABS and SCHO.

Drawdown Indicators

	JABS	SCHO	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-0.97%	-5.69%	+4.72%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	—	-0.86%	—
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	—	-0.98%	—
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	—	-5.69%	—
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	—	-5.69%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-0.12%	-0.27%	+0.15%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-0.18%	-0.61%	+0.43%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	—	0.20%	—

Volatility

Volatility by Period

	JABS	SCHO	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	—	0.41%	—
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	—	0.90%	—
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	2.00%	1.37%	+0.63%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	2.00%	1.98%	+0.02%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	2.00%	1.56%	+0.44%

JABS vs. SCHO - Expense Ratio Comparison

JABS has a 0.33% expense ratio, which is higher than SCHO's 0.03% expense ratio.

Dividends

JABS vs. SCHO - Dividend Comparison

JABS's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.19%, more than SCHO's 3.91% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
JABS Janus Henderson Asset-Backed Securities ETF	4.19%	2.19%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
SCHO Schwab Short-Term U.S. Treasury ETF	3.91%	4.06%	4.29%	3.76%	1.34%	0.41%	1.27%	2.27%	1.60%	1.12%	0.82%	0.68%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both JABS and SCHO in my portfolio?

JABS and SCHO have a correlation of 0.28, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which ETF is better, JABS or SCHO?

On fees, SCHO is cheaper at 0.03% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF is cheaper, JABS or SCHO?

SCHO is cheaper with a 0.03% expense ratio, compared with 0.33% for JABS.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, JABS or SCHO?

JABS has the higher dividend yield at 4.19%, compared with 3.91% for SCHO.

What is the main difference between JABS and SCHO?

JABS is categorized as Short-Term Bond, while SCHO is Government Bonds. They also come from different issuers: Janus Henderson and Charles Schwab. Their fees differ too: 0.33% for JABS and 0.03% for SCHO.