JABS vs. DCMB
JABS (Janus Henderson Asset-Backed Securities ETF) and DCMB (Doubleline Commercial Real Estate ETF) are both Short-Term Bond funds. Both are actively managed. At a 0.29 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. JABS charges 0.33%/yr vs 0.40%/yr for DCMB.
Performance
JABS vs. DCMB - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
The year-to-date returns for both investments are quite close, with JABS having a 1.81% return and DCMB slightly higher at 1.90%.
JABS
- 1D
- -0.01%
- 1M
- 0.27%
- 6M
- 1.64%
- YTD
- 1.81%
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
DCMB
- 1D
- 0.02%
- 1M
- 0.33%
- 6M
- 1.58%
- YTD
- 1.90%
- 1Y
- 4.49%
- 3Y*
- 6.08%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
JABS vs. DCMB - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
JABS Janus Henderson Asset-Backed Securities ETF | 1.81% | 2.49% |
DCMB Doubleline Commercial Real Estate ETF | 1.90% | 2.33% |
Correlation
The correlation between JABS and DCMB is 0.29, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 23, 2025 | 0.29 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
JABS vs. DCMB — Risk / Return Rank
JABS
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
DCMB
JABS vs. DCMB - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Janus Henderson Asset-Backed Securities ETF (JABS) and Doubleline Commercial Real Estate ETF (DCMB). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| JABS | DCMB | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | — | — | |
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | — | — | |
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | — | 1.86 | — |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | — | 6.62 | — |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | — | 23.95 | — |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
JABS vs. DCMB - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum JABS drawdown since its inception was -0.97%, which is greater than DCMB's maximum drawdown of -0.84%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for JABS and DCMB.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| JABS | DCMB | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -0.97% | -0.84% | -0.13% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | — | -0.68% | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | — | -0.84% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.01% | -0.06% | +0.05% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -0.17% | -0.11% | -0.06% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | — | 0.19% | — |
Volatility
JABS vs. DCMB - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| JABS | DCMB | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | — | 0.40% | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | — | 0.96% | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.95% | 1.19% | +0.76% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 1.95% | 1.58% | +0.37% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 1.95% | 1.58% | +0.37% |
JABS vs. DCMB - Expense Ratio Comparison
JABS has a 0.33% expense ratio, which is lower than DCMB's 0.40% expense ratio.
Dividends
JABS vs. DCMB - Dividend Comparison
JABS's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.58%, less than DCMB's 4.75% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
DCMB Doubleline Commercial Real Estate ETF | 4.75% | 4.84% | 5.52% | 3.47% |
JABS Janus Henderson Asset-Backed Securities ETF | 4.58% | 2.19% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
JABS and DCMB have a correlation of 0.29, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, JABS is cheaper at 0.33% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
JABS is cheaper with a 0.33% expense ratio, compared with 0.40% for DCMB.
DCMB has the higher dividend yield at 4.75%, compared with 4.58% for JABS.
They also come from different issuers: Janus Henderson and DoubleLine. Their fees differ too: 0.33% for JABS and 0.40% for DCMB.
Find the right allocation for JABS and DCMB
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer