JAAA vs. JLQD
JAAA (Janus Henderson AAA CLO ETF) and JLQD (Janus Henderson Corporate Bond ETF) are both exchange-traded funds — JAAA is a CLO fund actively managed by Janus Henderson, while JLQD is a Corporate Bonds fund tracking the Bloomberg U.S. Corporate Bond Index. JAAA is actively managed, while JLQD is passively managed. Over the past 3 years, JAAA returned 6.75%/yr vs 5.04%/yr for JLQD. At 0.07, their price movements are largely independent. JAAA charges 0.21%/yr vs 0.20%/yr for JLQD.
Performance
JAAA vs. JLQD - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, JAAA achieves a 0.99% return, which is significantly higher than JLQD's 0.03% return.
JAAA
- 1D
- 0.00%
- 1M
- 0.52%
- YTD
- 0.99%
- 6M
- 2.38%
- 1Y
- 6.76%
- 3Y*
- 6.75%
- 5Y*
- 4.65%
- 10Y*
- —
JLQD
- 1D
- -0.13%
- 1M
- 0.27%
- YTD
- 0.03%
- 6M
- 1.01%
- 1Y
- 8.54%
- 3Y*
- 5.04%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
JAAA vs. JLQD - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
JAAA Janus Henderson AAA CLO ETF | 0.99% | 5.16% | 7.43% | 8.59% | 0.49% | 0.18% |
JLQD Janus Henderson Corporate Bond ETF | 0.03% | 7.77% | 3.21% | 8.76% | -15.99% | -1.25% |
Correlation
The correlation between JAAA and JLQD is 0.12, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.12 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.05 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 10, 2021 | 0.07 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
JAAA vs. JLQD — Risk / Return Rank
JAAA
JLQD
JAAA vs. JLQD - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Janus Henderson AAA CLO ETF (JAAA) and Janus Henderson Corporate Bond ETF (JLQD). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| JAAA | JLQD | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 6.26 | 2.05 | +4.21 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 12.86 | 3.10 | +9.76 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 3.09 | 1.39 | +1.70 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 5.74 | 2.97 | +2.76 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 49.50 | 11.40 | +38.10 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| JAAA | JLQD | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 6.26 | 2.05 | +4.21 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 2.76 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 2.72 | 0.01 | +2.70 |
Drawdowns
JAAA vs. JLQD - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum JAAA drawdown since its inception was -2.64%, smaller than the maximum JLQD drawdown of -21.17%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for JAAA and JLQD.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| JAAA | JLQD | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -2.64% | -21.17% | +18.53% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -0.39% | -2.87% | +2.48% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -2.64% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | 0.00% | -1.18% | +1.18% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -0.26% | -9.02% | +8.76% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 0.12% | 0.75% | -0.63% |
Volatility
JAAA vs. JLQD - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Janus Henderson AAA CLO ETF (JAAA) is 0.36%, while Janus Henderson Corporate Bond ETF (JLQD) has a volatility of 1.84%. This indicates that JAAA experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than JLQD based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| JAAA | JLQD | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 0.36% | 1.84% | -1.48% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 0.68% | 2.59% | -1.91% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.52% | 4.38% | -2.86% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 1.69% | 6.38% | -4.69% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 1.66% | 6.38% | -4.72% |
JAAA vs. JLQD - Expense Ratio Comparison
JAAA has a 0.21% expense ratio, which is higher than JLQD's 0.20% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Dividends
JAAA vs. JLQD - Dividend Comparison
JAAA's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 5.13%, less than JLQD's 5.34% yield.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
JAAA Janus Henderson AAA CLO ETF | 5.13% | 5.30% | 6.35% | 6.11% | 2.74% | 1.21% | 0.26% |
JLQD Janus Henderson Corporate Bond ETF | 5.34% | 5.28% | 5.36% | 3.99% | 2.77% | 0.83% | 0.00% |