JAAA vs. AAAC

Last updated Aug 4, 2026

JAAA (Janus Henderson AAA CLO ETF) and AAAC (Columbia AAA CLO ETF) are both CLO funds. Both are actively managed. Their 0.12 correlation means their historical movements had little consistent relationship. Both charge a 0.20% expense ratio.

Performance

JAAA vs. AAAC - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Janus Henderson AAA CLO ETF (JAAA) and Columbia AAA CLO ETF (AAAC). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, JAAA achieves a 2.62% return, which is significantly lower than AAAC's 2.83% return.

JAAA

• 1D: 0.02%
• 1M: 0.32%
• 6M: 2.03%
• YTD: 2.62%
• 1Y: 4.91%
• 3Y*: 6.18%
• 5Y*: 4.89%
• 10Y*: —
• ALL TIME*: 4.53%

AAAC

• 1D: 0.02%
• 1M: 0.37%
• 6M: 2.20%
• YTD: 2.83%
• 1Y: —
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —
• ALL TIME*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison

Position	Avg. Volume Value (2W)	Avg. Volume Value (1M)	Avg. Volume Value (3M)
AAAC Columbia AAA CLO ETF	$18.84K	$4.60M	$1.58M
JAAA Janus Henderson AAA CLO ETF	$270.67M	$249.72M	$261.40M

JAAA vs. AAAC - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025
JAAA Janus Henderson AAA CLO ETF	2.62%	0.57%
AAAC Columbia AAA CLO ETF	2.83%	0.15%

Correlation

The correlation between JAAA and AAAC is 0.12, which is low. Their historical price movements had little consistent relationship.

	Correlation
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 11, 2025	0.12

Return for Risk

JAAA vs. AAAC — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

JAAA

JAAA Risk / Return Rank: 99
JAAA Sharpe Ratio Rank: 99
JAAA Sortino Ratio Rank: 99
JAAA Omega Ratio Rank: 99
JAAA Calmar Ratio Rank: 98
JAAA Martin Ratio Rank: 99

AAAC

Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

JAAA vs. AAAC - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Janus Henderson AAA CLO ETF (JAAA) and Columbia AAA CLO ETF (AAAC). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	JAAA	AAAC	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	6.23	—	—
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	10.27	—	—
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	2.86	—	—
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	12.71	—	—
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	69.11	—	—

Drawdowns

JAAA vs. AAAC - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum JAAA drawdown since its inception was -2.64%, which is greater than AAAC's maximum drawdown of -0.55%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for JAAA and AAAC.

Drawdown Indicators

	JAAA	AAAC	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-2.64%	-0.55%	-2.09%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-0.39%	—	—
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-1.46%	—	—
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-2.64%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-0.24%	-0.03%	-0.21%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	0.07%	—	—

Volatility

Volatility by Period

	JAAA	AAAC	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	0.13%	—	—
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	0.61%	—	—
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.79%	0.82%	-0.03%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	1.66%	0.82%	+0.84%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	1.62%	0.82%	+0.80%

JAAA vs. AAAC - Expense Ratio Comparison

Both JAAA and AAAC have an expense ratio of 0.20%, making them cost-effective options compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios typically range from 0.3% to 0.9%.

Dividends

JAAA vs. AAAC - Dividend Comparison

JAAA's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.93%, more than AAAC's 2.87% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020
AAAC Columbia AAA CLO ETF	2.87%	0.03%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
JAAA Janus Henderson AAA CLO ETF	4.93%	5.30%	6.35%	6.11%	2.74%	1.21%	0.26%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both JAAA and AAAC in my portfolio?

JAAA and AAAC have a correlation of 0.12, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which ETF is better, JAAA or AAAC?

Both ETFs have the same 0.20% expense ratio. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF is cheaper, JAAA or AAAC?

JAAA and AAAC have the same expense ratio: 0.20% per year.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, JAAA or AAAC?

JAAA has the higher dividend yield at 4.93%, compared with 2.87% for AAAC.

What is the main difference between JAAA and AAAC?

They also come from different issuers: Janus Henderson and Columbia.