PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
J vs. LULU
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends
Financials

Performance

J vs. LULU - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Jacobs Engineering Group Inc. (J) and Lululemon Athletica Inc. (LULU). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, J achieves a -3.57% return, which is significantly higher than LULU's -42.85% return. Over the past 10 years, J has outperformed LULU with an annualized return of 12.69%, while LULU has yielded a comparatively lower 5.37% annualized return.


J

1D
0.55%
1M
12.99%
YTD
-3.57%
6M
-5.89%
1Y
1.93%
3Y*
10.99%
5Y*
2.92%
10Y*
12.69%

LULU

1D
-2.52%
1M
-1.89%
YTD
-42.85%
6M
-42.05%
1Y
-50.33%
3Y*
-31.43%
5Y*
-18.89%
10Y*
5.37%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

J vs. LULU - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
J
Jacobs Engineering Group Inc.
-3.57%2.13%24.23%9.02%-13.12%28.60%22.36%54.99%-10.58%16.98%
LULU
Lululemon Athletica Inc.
-42.85%-45.66%-25.21%59.59%-18.16%12.48%50.23%90.50%54.74%20.93%

Correlation

The correlation between J and LULU is 0.40, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.40

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.35

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.39

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.33

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 27, 2007

0.37

Fundamentals

EPS

J:

$2.83

LULU:

$12.35

PE Ratio

J:

44.87

LULU:

9.62

PEG Ratio

J:

8.07

LULU:

0.47

PS Ratio

J:

0.87

LULU:

1.25

Total Revenue (TTM)

J:

$13.17B

LULU:

$11.20B

Gross Profit (TTM)

J:

$3.08B

LULU:

$6.24B

EBITDA (TTM)

J:

$845.72M

LULU:

$2.44B

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

J vs. LULU — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

J
J Risk / Return Rank: 4141
Overall Rank
J Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4343
Sharpe Ratio Rank
J Sortino Ratio Rank: 3737
Sortino Ratio Rank
J Omega Ratio Rank: 3838
Omega Ratio Rank
J Calmar Ratio Rank: 4343
Calmar Ratio Rank
J Martin Ratio Rank: 4242
Martin Ratio Rank

LULU
LULU Risk / Return Rank: 33
Overall Rank
LULU Sharpe Ratio Rank: 33
Sharpe Ratio Rank
LULU Sortino Ratio Rank: 44
Sortino Ratio Rank
LULU Omega Ratio Rank: 44
Omega Ratio Rank
LULU Calmar Ratio Rank: 33
Calmar Ratio Rank
LULU Martin Ratio Rank: 33
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

J vs. LULU - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Jacobs Engineering Group Inc. (J) and Lululemon Athletica Inc. (LULU). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


JLULUDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+1.19

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+1.98

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.03

0.78

+0.26

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

0.02

-0.97

+0.98

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

0.04

-1.72

+1.75

J vs. LULU - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current J Sharpe Ratio is 0.02, which is higher than the LULU Sharpe Ratio of -1.17. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of J and LULU, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

J vs. LULU - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum J drawdown since its inception was -74.14%, smaller than the maximum LULU drawdown of -92.26%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for J and LULU.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


JLULUDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-74.14%

-92.26%

+18.12%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-34.44%

-53.88%

+19.44%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-34.44%

-77.66%

+43.22%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-34.44%

-77.66%

+43.22%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-39.33%

-77.66%

+38.33%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-22.14%

-76.77%

+54.63%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-26.17%

-27.61%

+1.44%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

15.50%

30.26%

-14.76%

Volatility

J vs. LULU - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Jacobs Engineering Group Inc. (J) is 9.83%, while Lululemon Athletica Inc. (LULU) has a volatility of 13.47%. This indicates that J experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than LULU based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


JLULUDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

9.83%

13.47%

-3.64%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

25.51%

32.76%

-7.25%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

31.96%

44.48%

-12.52%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

26.20%

42.22%

-16.02%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

27.84%

40.62%

-12.78%

Dividends

J vs. LULU - Dividend Comparison

J's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.07%, while LULU has not paid dividends to shareholders.


PositionTTM202520242023202220212020201920182017
J
Jacobs Engineering Group Inc.
1.07%1.96%0.76%0.80%0.77%0.60%0.70%0.76%1.03%0.91%
LULU
Lululemon Athletica Inc.
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Financials

J vs. LULU - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Jacobs Engineering Group Inc. and Lululemon Athletica Inc.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


-1.00B0.001.00B2.00B3.00B4.00B20222023202420252026
3.69B
2.47B
(J) Total Revenue
(LULU) Total Revenue
Values in USD except per share items

J vs. LULU - Profitability Comparison

The chart below illustrates the profitability comparison between Jacobs Engineering Group Inc. and Lululemon Athletica Inc. over time, highlighting three key metrics: Gross Profit Margin, Operating Margin, and Net Profit Margin.

Gross Margin
Operating Margin
Net Margin
Quarterly
Annual

-20.0%0.0%20.0%40.0%60.0%20222023202420252026
21.5%
54.2%
Portfolio components
J - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Jacobs Engineering Group Inc. reported a gross profit of 794.89M and revenue of 3.69B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 21.5%.

LULU - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Lululemon Athletica Inc. reported a gross profit of 1.34B and revenue of 2.47B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 54.2%.

J - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Jacobs Engineering Group Inc. reported an operating income of -81.18M and revenue of 3.69B, resulting in an operating margin of -2.2%.

LULU - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Lululemon Athletica Inc. reported an operating income of 276.95M and revenue of 2.47B, resulting in an operating margin of 11.2%.

J - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Jacobs Engineering Group Inc. reported a net income of -175.69M and revenue of 3.69B, resulting in a net margin of -4.8%.

LULU - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Lululemon Athletica Inc. reported a net income of 195.05M and revenue of 2.47B, resulting in a net margin of 7.9%.


Frequently Asked Questions


J and LULU have a correlation of 0.40, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

LULU has higher volatility (13.47%) compared to J (9.83%). In terms of maximum drawdown, J dropped -74.14% vs LULU's -92.26%.

J currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.02 vs -1.17), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for J and LULU

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer