J vs. FDS

Last updated Apr 1, 2026

Compare and contrast key facts about Jacobs Engineering Group Inc. (J) and FactSet Research Systems Inc. (FDS).

Performance

J vs. FDS - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Jacobs Engineering Group Inc. (J) and FactSet Research Systems Inc. (FDS). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

J vs. FDS - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
J Jacobs Engineering Group Inc.	-3.66%	2.13%	24.23%	9.02%	-13.12%	28.60%	22.36%	54.99%	-10.58%	16.98%
FDS FactSet Research Systems Inc.	-24.84%	-38.88%	1.62%	19.99%	-16.75%	47.49%	25.13%	35.51%	5.02%	19.44%

Fundamentals

Market Cap J : $15.15B FDS : $8.10B
EPS J : $3.64 FDS : $15.51
PE Ratio J : 35.01 FDS : 13.99
PEG Ratio J : 6.30 FDS : 1.31
PS Ratio J : 1.23 FDS : 3.42
PB Ratio J : 4.40 FDS : 3.81
Total Revenue (TTM) J : $12.39B FDS : $2.40B
Gross Profit (TTM) J : $3.03B FDS : $1.25B
EBITDA (TTM) J : $1.08B FDS : $821.05M

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, J achieves a -3.66% return, which is significantly higher than FDS's -24.84% return. Over the past 10 years, J has outperformed FDS with an annualized return of 14.42%, while FDS has yielded a comparatively lower 4.68% annualized return.

J

• 1D: 1.99%
• 1M: -7.67%
• YTD: -3.66%
• 6M: -14.64%
• 1Y: 8.48%
• 3Y*: 10.76%
• 5Y*: 4.50%
• 10Y*: 14.42%

FDS

• 1D: 6.08%
• 1M: 0.08%
• YTD: -24.84%
• 6M: -23.57%
• 1Y: -51.58%
• 3Y*: -18.55%
• 5Y*: -6.37%
• 10Y*: 4.68%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Return for Risk

J vs. FDS — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

J

J Risk / Return Rank: 49
J Sharpe Ratio Rank: 52
J Sortino Ratio Rank: 45
J Omega Ratio Rank: 46
J Calmar Ratio Rank: 51
J Martin Ratio Rank: 50

FDS

FDS Risk / Return Rank: 5
FDS Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1
FDS Sortino Ratio Rank: 2
FDS Omega Ratio Rank: 2
FDS Calmar Ratio Rank: 10
FDS Martin Ratio Rank: 11

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

J vs. FDS - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Jacobs Engineering Group Inc. (J) and FactSet Research Systems Inc. (FDS). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	J	FDS	Difference
Sharpe ratio Return per unit of total volatility	0.28	-1.41	+1.69
Sortino ratio Return per unit of downside risk	0.57	-2.16	+2.73
Omega ratio Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.08	0.71	+0.37
Calmar ratio Return relative to maximum drawdown	0.35	-0.86	+1.20
Martin ratio Return relative to average drawdown	0.76	-1.49	+2.25
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

J vs. FDS - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current J Sharpe Ratio is 0.28, which is higher than the FDS Sharpe Ratio of -1.41. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of J and FDS, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	J	FDS	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.28	-1.41	+1.69
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.18	-0.24	+0.42
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.53	0.17	+0.35
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.39	0.44	-0.04

Correlation

The correlation between J and FDS is 0.37, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.

Dividends

J vs. FDS - Dividend Comparison

J's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.07%, more than FDS's 2.03% yield.

	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
J Jacobs Engineering Group Inc.	2.07%	1.96%	0.76%	0.80%	0.77%	0.60%	0.70%	0.76%	1.03%	0.91%	0.00%	0.00%
FDS FactSet Research Systems Inc.	2.03%	1.50%	0.85%	0.80%	0.87%	0.66%	0.91%	1.04%	1.24%	1.13%	1.19%	1.05%

Drawdowns

J vs. FDS - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum J drawdown since its inception was -74.14%, which is greater than FDS's maximum drawdown of -61.13%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for J and FDS.

Drawdown Indicators

	J	FDS	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-74.14%	-61.13%	-13.01%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-23.73%	-59.47%	+35.74%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-26.37%	-61.13%	+34.76%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-39.33%	-61.13%	+21.80%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-22.21%	-55.40%	+33.19%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-26.18%	-12.96%	-13.22%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	10.80%	34.14%	-23.34%

Volatility

J vs. FDS - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Jacobs Engineering Group Inc. (J) is 6.03%, while FactSet Research Systems Inc. (FDS) has a volatility of 11.17%. This indicates that J experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than FDS based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	J	FDS	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	6.03%	11.17%	-5.14%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	24.98%	30.24%	-5.26%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	30.81%	36.71%	-5.90%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	25.30%	26.27%	-0.97%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	27.50%	26.82%	+0.68%

Financials

J vs. FDS - Profitability Comparison

The chart below illustrates the profitability comparison between Jacobs Engineering Group Inc. and FactSet Research Systems Inc. over time, highlighting three key metrics: Gross Profit Margin, Operating Margin, and Net Profit Margin.

J - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, Jacobs Engineering Group Inc. reported a gross profit of 765.25M and revenue of 3.29B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 23.2%.

FDS - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, FactSet Research Systems Inc. reported a gross profit of 314.28M and revenue of 611.02M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 51.4%.

J - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, Jacobs Engineering Group Inc. reported an operating income of 232.56M and revenue of 3.29B, resulting in an operating margin of 7.1%.

FDS - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, FactSet Research Systems Inc. reported an operating income of 184.96M and revenue of 611.02M, resulting in an operating margin of 30.3%.

J - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, Jacobs Engineering Group Inc. reported a net income of 133.20M and revenue of 3.29B, resulting in a net margin of 4.0%.

FDS - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, FactSet Research Systems Inc. reported a net income of 133.06M and revenue of 611.02M, resulting in a net margin of 21.8%.