PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
J vs. JBHT
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends
Financials

Performance

J vs. JBHT - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Jacobs Engineering Group Inc. (J) and J.B. Hunt Transport Services, Inc. (JBHT). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, J achieves a 2.45% return, which is significantly lower than JBHT's 40.37% return. Over the past 10 years, J has underperformed JBHT with an annualized return of 12.95%, while JBHT has yielded a comparatively higher 13.85% annualized return.


J

1D
1.64%
1M
5.50%
6M
0.33%
YTD
2.45%
1Y
-1.98%
3Y*
10.13%
5Y*
4.89%
10Y*
12.95%
ALL TIME*
13.31%

JBHT

1D
0.94%
1M
-4.93%
6M
34.57%
YTD
40.37%
1Y
96.60%
3Y*
11.13%
5Y*
11.06%
10Y*
13.85%
ALL TIME*
13.68%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison


PositionAvg. Volume Value (2W)Avg. Volume Value (1M)Avg. Volume Value (3M)
$108.51M$112.80M$159.36M
$300.12M$310.48M$284.80M

J vs. JBHT - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
J
Jacobs Engineering Group Inc.
2.45%2.13%24.23%9.02%-13.12%28.60%22.36%54.99%-10.58%16.98%
JBHT
J.B. Hunt Transport Services, Inc.
40.37%15.20%-13.75%15.59%-13.92%50.64%18.11%26.77%-18.41%19.60%

Correlation

The correlation between J and JBHT is 0.29, which is low. Their historical price movements had little consistent relationship.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.

0.29

Correlation (3Y)
Balances recent behavior with more history.

0.42

Correlation (5Y)
Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period.

0.43

Correlation (10Y)
Provides a long-term view across more market conditions.

0.44

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 26, 1990

0.33

The correlation between J and JBHT shifts across timeframes, from 0.29 (1 year) to 0.44 (10 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Fundamentals

Market Cap

J:

$15.93B

JBHT:

$25.52B

EPS

J:

$3.19

JBHT:

$7.02

PE Ratio

J:

42.26

JBHT:

38.68

PS Ratio

J:

0.82

JBHT:

2.05

Total Revenue (TTM)

J:

$13.17B

JBHT:

$12.70B

Gross Profit (TTM)

J:

$3.08B

JBHT:

$2.07B

EBITDA (TTM)

J:

$845.72M

JBHT:

$1.64B

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

J vs. JBHT — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

J
J Risk / Return Rank: 3838
Overall Rank
J Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3939
Sharpe Ratio Rank
J Sortino Ratio Rank: 3434
Sortino Ratio Rank
J Omega Ratio Rank: 3535
Omega Ratio Rank
J Calmar Ratio Rank: 4141
Calmar Ratio Rank
J Martin Ratio Rank: 4040
Martin Ratio Rank

JBHT
JBHT Risk / Return Rank: 9595
Overall Rank
JBHT Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9595
Sharpe Ratio Rank
JBHT Sortino Ratio Rank: 9696
Sortino Ratio Rank
JBHT Omega Ratio Rank: 9494
Omega Ratio Rank
JBHT Calmar Ratio Rank: 9696
Calmar Ratio Rank
JBHT Martin Ratio Rank: 9797
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

J vs. JBHT - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Jacobs Engineering Group Inc. (J) and J.B. Hunt Transport Services, Inc. (JBHT). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


JJBHTDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-2.47

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-3.55

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.01

1.43

-0.42

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

-0.11

5.73

-5.85

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

-0.23

16.94

-17.16

J vs. JBHT - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current J Sharpe Ratio is -0.12, which is lower than the JBHT Sharpe Ratio of 2.35. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of J and JBHT, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

J vs. JBHT - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum J drawdown since its inception was -74.14%, roughly equal to the maximum JBHT drawdown of -71.55%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for J and JBHT.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


JJBHTDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-74.14%

-71.55%

-2.59%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-34.44%

-15.87%

-18.57%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-34.44%

-42.41%

+7.97%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-34.44%

-42.41%

+7.97%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-39.33%

-42.41%

+3.08%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-17.27%

-8.93%

-8.34%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-26.15%

-18.49%

-7.66%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

17.35%

5.37%

+11.98%

Volatility

J vs. JBHT - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Jacobs Engineering Group Inc. (J) is 8.43%, while J.B. Hunt Transport Services, Inc. (JBHT) has a volatility of 10.38%. This indicates that J experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than JBHT based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


JJBHTDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

8.43%

10.38%

-1.95%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

26.57%

24.98%

+1.59%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

32.78%

38.70%

-5.92%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

26.29%

32.27%

-5.98%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

27.83%

30.02%

-2.19%

Dividends

J vs. JBHT - Dividend Comparison

J's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.01%, more than JBHT's 0.66% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
J
Jacobs Engineering Group Inc.
1.01%1.96%0.76%0.80%0.77%0.60%0.70%0.76%1.03%0.91%0.00%0.00%
JBHT
J.B. Hunt Transport Services, Inc.
0.66%0.91%1.01%0.84%0.92%0.58%0.79%0.89%1.03%0.80%0.91%1.15%

Financials

J vs. JBHT - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Jacobs Engineering Group Inc. and J.B. Hunt Transport Services, Inc.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


Values in USD except per share items

J vs. JBHT - Profitability Comparison

The chart below illustrates the profitability comparison between Jacobs Engineering Group Inc. and J.B. Hunt Transport Services, Inc. over time, highlighting three key metrics: Gross Profit Margin, Operating Margin, and Net Profit Margin.

Gross Margin
Operating Margin
Net Margin
Quarterly
Annual

J - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, Jacobs Engineering Group Inc. reported a gross profit of 794.89M and revenue of 3.69B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 21.5%.

JBHT - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, J.B. Hunt Transport Services, Inc. reported a gross profit of 354.18M and revenue of 3.50B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 10.1%.

J - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, Jacobs Engineering Group Inc. reported an operating income of -81.18M and revenue of 3.69B, resulting in an operating margin of -2.2%.

JBHT - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, J.B. Hunt Transport Services, Inc. reported an operating income of 259.45M and revenue of 3.50B, resulting in an operating margin of 7.4%.

J - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, Jacobs Engineering Group Inc. reported a net income of -175.69M and revenue of 3.69B, resulting in a net margin of -4.8%.

JBHT - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, J.B. Hunt Transport Services, Inc. reported a net income of 181.03M and revenue of 3.50B, resulting in a net margin of 5.2%.


Frequently Asked Questions


J and JBHT have a correlation of 0.29, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

JBHT has higher volatility (10.38%) compared to J (8.43%). In terms of maximum drawdown, J dropped -74.14% vs JBHT's -71.55%.

JBHT currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.35 vs -0.12), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for J and JBHT

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer