PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
JBHT vs. AAPL
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends
Financials

Performance

JBHT vs. AAPL - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in J.B. Hunt Transport Services, Inc. (JBHT) and Apple Inc (AAPL). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, JBHT achieves a 40.37% return, which is significantly higher than AAPL's 13.84% return. Over the past 10 years, JBHT has underperformed AAPL with an annualized return of 13.85%, while AAPL has yielded a comparatively higher 29.23% annualized return.


JBHT

1D
0.94%
1M
-4.93%
6M
34.57%
YTD
40.37%
1Y
96.60%
3Y*
11.13%
5Y*
11.06%
10Y*
13.85%
ALL TIME*
13.68%

AAPL

1D
-7.35%
1M
0.09%
6M
19.27%
YTD
13.84%
1Y
53.24%
3Y*
16.99%
5Y*
16.79%
10Y*
29.23%
ALL TIME*
19.30%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison


PositionAvg. Volume Value (2W)Avg. Volume Value (1M)Avg. Volume Value (3M)
$19.18B$17.68B$17.20B
$300.12M$310.48M$284.80M

JBHT vs. AAPL - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
JBHT
J.B. Hunt Transport Services, Inc.
40.37%15.20%-13.75%15.59%-13.92%50.64%18.11%26.77%-18.41%19.60%
AAPL
Apple Inc
13.84%9.05%30.71%49.01%-26.40%34.65%82.31%88.96%-5.39%48.46%

Correlation

The correlation between JBHT and AAPL is 0.14, which is low. Their historical price movements had little consistent relationship.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.

0.14

Correlation (3Y)
Balances recent behavior with more history.

0.24

Correlation (5Y)
Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period.

0.33

Correlation (10Y)
Provides a long-term view across more market conditions.

0.29

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 26, 1990

0.24

The correlation between JBHT and AAPL shifts across timeframes, from 0.14 (1 year) to 0.33 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Fundamentals

Market Cap

JBHT:

$25.52B

AAPL:

$4.54T

EPS

JBHT:

$7.02

AAPL:

$8.69

PE Ratio

JBHT:

38.68

AAPL:

35.54

PS Ratio

JBHT:

2.05

AAPL:

9.82

PB Ratio

JBHT:

7.06

AAPL:

42.38

Total Revenue (TTM)

JBHT:

$12.70B

AAPL:

$466.82B

Gross Profit (TTM)

JBHT:

$2.07B

AAPL:

$227.12B

EBITDA (TTM)

JBHT:

$1.64B

AAPL:

$168.49B

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

JBHT vs. AAPL — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

JBHT
JBHT Risk / Return Rank: 9595
Overall Rank
JBHT Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9595
Sharpe Ratio Rank
JBHT Sortino Ratio Rank: 9696
Sortino Ratio Rank
JBHT Omega Ratio Rank: 9494
Omega Ratio Rank
JBHT Calmar Ratio Rank: 9696
Calmar Ratio Rank
JBHT Martin Ratio Rank: 9797
Martin Ratio Rank

AAPL
AAPL Risk / Return Rank: 8989
Overall Rank
AAPL Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9191
Sharpe Ratio Rank
AAPL Sortino Ratio Rank: 8888
Sortino Ratio Rank
AAPL Omega Ratio Rank: 9090
Omega Ratio Rank
AAPL Calmar Ratio Rank: 9090
Calmar Ratio Rank
AAPL Martin Ratio Rank: 8888
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

JBHT vs. AAPL - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for J.B. Hunt Transport Services, Inc. (JBHT) and Apple Inc (AAPL). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


JBHTAAPLDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.43

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+1.03

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.43

1.35

+0.07

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

5.73

3.60

+2.13

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

16.94

8.56

+8.37

JBHT vs. AAPL - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current JBHT Sharpe Ratio is 2.35, which is comparable to the AAPL Sharpe Ratio of 1.92. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of JBHT and AAPL, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

JBHT vs. AAPL - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum JBHT drawdown since its inception was -71.55%, smaller than the maximum AAPL drawdown of -81.80%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for JBHT and AAPL.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


JBHTAAPLDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-71.55%

-81.80%

+10.25%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-15.87%

-13.80%

-2.07%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-42.41%

-33.36%

-9.05%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-42.41%

-33.36%

-9.05%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-42.41%

-38.52%

-3.89%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-8.93%

-9.17%

+0.24%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-18.49%

-29.52%

+11.03%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

5.37%

5.79%

-0.42%

Volatility

JBHT vs. AAPL - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for J.B. Hunt Transport Services, Inc. (JBHT) is 10.38%, while Apple Inc (AAPL) has a volatility of 11.52%. This indicates that JBHT experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than AAPL based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


JBHTAAPLDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

10.38%

11.52%

-1.14%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

24.98%

20.71%

+4.27%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

38.70%

25.91%

+12.79%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

32.27%

28.02%

+4.25%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

30.02%

29.12%

+0.90%

Dividends

JBHT vs. AAPL - Dividend Comparison

JBHT's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.66%, more than AAPL's 0.34% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
AAPL
Apple Inc
0.34%0.38%0.40%0.49%0.70%0.49%0.61%1.04%1.79%1.45%1.93%1.93%
JBHT
J.B. Hunt Transport Services, Inc.
0.66%0.91%1.01%0.84%0.92%0.58%0.79%0.89%1.03%0.80%0.91%1.15%

Financials

JBHT vs. AAPL - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between J.B. Hunt Transport Services, Inc. and Apple Inc. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


Values in USD except per share items

JBHT vs. AAPL - Profitability Comparison

The chart below illustrates the profitability comparison between J.B. Hunt Transport Services, Inc. and Apple Inc over time, highlighting three key metrics: Gross Profit Margin, Operating Margin, and Net Profit Margin.

Gross Margin
Operating Margin
Net Margin
Quarterly
Annual

JBHT - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, J.B. Hunt Transport Services, Inc. reported a gross profit of 354.18M and revenue of 3.50B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 10.1%.

AAPL - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, Apple Inc reported a gross profit of 54.77B and revenue of 109.42B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 50.1%.

JBHT - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, J.B. Hunt Transport Services, Inc. reported an operating income of 259.45M and revenue of 3.50B, resulting in an operating margin of 7.4%.

AAPL - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, Apple Inc reported an operating income of 35.70B and revenue of 109.42B, resulting in an operating margin of 32.6%.

JBHT - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, J.B. Hunt Transport Services, Inc. reported a net income of 181.03M and revenue of 3.50B, resulting in a net margin of 5.2%.

AAPL - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, Apple Inc reported a net income of 29.79B and revenue of 109.42B, resulting in a net margin of 27.2%.


Frequently Asked Questions


JBHT and AAPL have a correlation of 0.14, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

AAPL has higher volatility (11.52%) compared to JBHT (10.38%). In terms of maximum drawdown, JBHT dropped -71.55% vs AAPL's -81.80%.

JBHT currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.35 vs 1.92), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for JBHT and AAPL

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer