PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
JBHT vs. AAPL
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends
Financials

Performance

JBHT vs. AAPL - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in J.B. Hunt Transport Services, Inc. (JBHT) and Apple Inc (AAPL). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, JBHT achieves a 39.08% return, which is significantly higher than AAPL's 8.46% return. Over the past 10 years, JBHT has underperformed AAPL with an annualized return of 14.20%, while AAPL has yielded a comparatively higher 30.05% annualized return.


JBHT

1D
-1.55%
1M
4.05%
YTD
39.08%
6M
37.18%
1Y
90.51%
3Y*
16.54%
5Y*
11.93%
10Y*
14.20%

AAPL

1D
-0.91%
1M
-4.70%
YTD
8.46%
6M
8.26%
1Y
46.63%
3Y*
16.93%
5Y*
17.74%
10Y*
30.05%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

JBHT vs. AAPL - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
JBHT
J.B. Hunt Transport Services, Inc.
39.08%15.20%-13.75%15.59%-13.92%50.64%18.11%26.77%-18.41%19.60%
AAPL
Apple Inc
8.46%9.05%30.71%49.01%-26.40%34.65%82.31%88.96%-5.39%48.46%

Correlation

The correlation between JBHT and AAPL is 0.19, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.19

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.25

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.34

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.29

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 26, 1990

0.24

The correlation between JBHT and AAPL shifts across timeframes, from 0.19 (1 year) to 0.34 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Fundamentals

Market Cap

JBHT:

$25.63B

AAPL:

$4.35T

EPS

JBHT:

$6.41

AAPL:

$8.24

PE Ratio

JBHT:

42.02

AAPL:

35.73

PS Ratio

JBHT:

2.15

AAPL:

9.70

PB Ratio

JBHT:

7.13

AAPL:

40.81

Total Revenue (TTM)

JBHT:

$12.13B

AAPL:

$451.44B

Gross Profit (TTM)

JBHT:

$2.10B

AAPL:

$216.07B

EBITDA (TTM)

JBHT:

$1.57B

AAPL:

$153.63B

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

JBHT vs. AAPL — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

JBHT
JBHT Risk / Return Rank: 9393
Overall Rank
JBHT Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9292
Sharpe Ratio Rank
JBHT Sortino Ratio Rank: 9494
Sortino Ratio Rank
JBHT Omega Ratio Rank: 9191
Omega Ratio Rank
JBHT Calmar Ratio Rank: 9494
Calmar Ratio Rank
JBHT Martin Ratio Rank: 9393
Martin Ratio Rank

AAPL
AAPL Risk / Return Rank: 8787
Overall Rank
AAPL Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8989
Sharpe Ratio Rank
AAPL Sortino Ratio Rank: 8888
Sortino Ratio Rank
AAPL Omega Ratio Rank: 8888
Omega Ratio Rank
AAPL Calmar Ratio Rank: 8686
Calmar Ratio Rank
AAPL Martin Ratio Rank: 8585
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

JBHT vs. AAPL - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for J.B. Hunt Transport Services, Inc. (JBHT) and Apple Inc (AAPL). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


JBHTAAPLDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.31

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.70

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.43

1.38

+0.06

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

5.73

3.40

+2.34

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

14.93

8.35

+6.58

JBHT vs. AAPL - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current JBHT Sharpe Ratio is 2.39, which is comparable to the AAPL Sharpe Ratio of 2.08. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of JBHT and AAPL, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

JBHT vs. AAPL - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum JBHT drawdown since its inception was -71.55%, smaller than the maximum AAPL drawdown of -81.80%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for JBHT and AAPL.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


JBHTAAPLDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-71.55%

-81.80%

+10.25%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-15.87%

-13.80%

-2.07%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-42.41%

-33.36%

-9.05%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-42.41%

-33.36%

-9.05%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-42.41%

-38.52%

-3.89%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-6.95%

-6.63%

-0.32%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-18.54%

-29.58%

+11.04%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

6.08%

5.60%

+0.48%

Volatility

JBHT vs. AAPL - Volatility Comparison

J.B. Hunt Transport Services, Inc. (JBHT) has a higher volatility of 8.55% compared to Apple Inc (AAPL) at 6.98%. This indicates that JBHT's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than AAPL based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


JBHTAAPLDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

8.55%

6.98%

+1.57%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

23.17%

16.62%

+6.55%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

38.13%

22.57%

+15.56%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

32.09%

27.52%

+4.57%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

29.93%

28.92%

+1.01%

Dividends

JBHT vs. AAPL - Dividend Comparison

JBHT's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.66%, more than AAPL's 0.36% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
AAPL
Apple Inc
0.36%0.38%0.40%0.49%0.70%0.49%0.61%1.04%1.79%1.45%1.93%1.93%
JBHT
J.B. Hunt Transport Services, Inc.
0.66%0.91%1.01%0.84%0.92%0.58%0.79%0.89%1.03%0.80%0.91%1.15%

Financials

JBHT vs. AAPL - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between J.B. Hunt Transport Services, Inc. and Apple Inc. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


0.0050.00B100.00B150.00B20222023202420252026
3.06B
111.18B
(JBHT) Total Revenue
(AAPL) Total Revenue
Values in USD except per share items

JBHT vs. AAPL - Profitability Comparison

The chart below illustrates the profitability comparison between J.B. Hunt Transport Services, Inc. and Apple Inc over time, highlighting three key metrics: Gross Profit Margin, Operating Margin, and Net Profit Margin.

Gross Margin
Operating Margin
Net Margin
Quarterly
Annual

10.0%20.0%30.0%40.0%50.0%20222023202420252026
28.3%
49.3%
Portfolio components
JBHT - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, J.B. Hunt Transport Services, Inc. reported a gross profit of 866.00M and revenue of 3.06B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 28.3%.

AAPL - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Apple Inc reported a gross profit of 54.78B and revenue of 111.18B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 49.3%.

JBHT - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, J.B. Hunt Transport Services, Inc. reported an operating income of 207.05M and revenue of 3.06B, resulting in an operating margin of 6.8%.

AAPL - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Apple Inc reported an operating income of 35.89B and revenue of 111.18B, resulting in an operating margin of 32.3%.

JBHT - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, J.B. Hunt Transport Services, Inc. reported a net income of 141.55M and revenue of 3.06B, resulting in a net margin of 4.6%.

AAPL - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Apple Inc reported a net income of 29.58B and revenue of 111.18B, resulting in a net margin of 26.6%.


Frequently Asked Questions


JBHT and AAPL have a correlation of 0.19, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

JBHT has higher volatility (8.55%) compared to AAPL (6.98%). In terms of maximum drawdown, JBHT dropped -71.55% vs AAPL's -81.80%.

JBHT currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.39 vs 2.08), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for JBHT and AAPL

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer