PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
IYZ vs. IYF
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

IYZ vs. IYF - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in iShares U.S. Telecommunications ETF (IYZ) and iShares U.S. Financials ETF (IYF). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, IYZ achieves a 29.57% return, which is significantly higher than IYF's -0.19% return. Over the past 10 years, IYZ has underperformed IYF with an annualized return of 5.94%, while IYF has yielded a comparatively higher 13.53% annualized return.


IYZ

1D
1.27%
1M
0.83%
YTD
29.57%
6M
32.60%
1Y
58.27%
3Y*
28.37%
5Y*
7.57%
10Y*
5.94%

IYF

1D
1.38%
1M
4.53%
YTD
-0.19%
6M
-0.21%
1Y
13.73%
3Y*
21.71%
5Y*
10.87%
10Y*
13.53%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

IYZ vs. IYF - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
IYZ
iShares U.S. Telecommunications ETF
29.57%29.28%20.53%3.90%-30.29%11.69%4.13%16.14%-8.59%-11.86%
IYF
iShares U.S. Financials ETF
-0.19%18.25%31.30%15.32%-11.33%31.60%-1.00%31.86%-9.39%19.58%

Correlation

The correlation between IYZ and IYF is 0.44, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.44

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.54

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.64

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.63

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since May 26, 2000

0.63

The correlation between IYZ and IYF shifts across timeframes, from 0.44 (1 year) to 0.64 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

IYZ vs. IYF — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

IYZ
IYZ Risk / Return Rank: 9393
Overall Rank
IYZ Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9494
Sharpe Ratio Rank
IYZ Sortino Ratio Rank: 9292
Sortino Ratio Rank
IYZ Omega Ratio Rank: 9191
Omega Ratio Rank
IYZ Calmar Ratio Rank: 9494
Calmar Ratio Rank
IYZ Martin Ratio Rank: 9595
Martin Ratio Rank

IYF
IYF Risk / Return Rank: 2424
Overall Rank
IYF Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2727
Sharpe Ratio Rank
IYF Sortino Ratio Rank: 2525
Sortino Ratio Rank
IYF Omega Ratio Rank: 2525
Omega Ratio Rank
IYF Calmar Ratio Rank: 2222
Calmar Ratio Rank
IYF Martin Ratio Rank: 2222
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

IYZ vs. IYF - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares U.S. Telecommunications ETF (IYZ) and iShares U.S. Financials ETF (IYF). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


IYZIYFDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+2.18

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+2.74

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.52

1.15

+0.37

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

6.54

0.88

+5.65

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

25.99

2.38

+23.61

IYZ vs. IYF - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current IYZ Sharpe Ratio is 3.02, which is higher than the IYF Sharpe Ratio of 0.84. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of IYZ and IYF, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

IYZ vs. IYF - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum IYZ drawdown since its inception was -77.11%, roughly equal to the maximum IYF drawdown of -79.09%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for IYZ and IYF.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


IYZIYFDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-77.11%

-79.09%

+1.98%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-8.62%

-13.88%

+5.26%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-13.85%

-16.60%

+2.75%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-39.74%

-25.06%

-14.68%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-39.74%

-42.57%

+2.83%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-4.77%

-3.25%

-1.52%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-40.10%

-17.59%

-22.51%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.17%

5.13%

-2.96%

Volatility

IYZ vs. IYF - Volatility Comparison

iShares U.S. Telecommunications ETF (IYZ) has a higher volatility of 8.76% compared to iShares U.S. Financials ETF (IYF) at 4.27%. This indicates that IYZ's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than IYF based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


IYZIYFDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

8.76%

4.27%

+4.49%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

15.61%

11.12%

+4.49%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

18.65%

14.58%

+4.07%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

18.88%

19.04%

-0.16%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

19.30%

20.90%

-1.60%

IYZ vs. IYF - Expense Ratio Comparison

Both IYZ and IYF have an expense ratio of 0.42%.


Dividends

IYZ vs. IYF - Dividend Comparison

IYZ's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.53%, more than IYF's 1.49% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
IYF
iShares U.S. Financials ETF
1.49%1.32%1.29%1.67%1.86%1.27%1.72%1.64%1.90%1.46%1.67%1.66%
IYZ
iShares U.S. Telecommunications ETF
1.53%2.04%1.94%2.27%2.55%2.51%2.60%2.36%2.15%3.54%2.27%1.98%

Frequently Asked Questions


IYZ and IYF have a correlation of 0.44, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

IYZ has higher volatility (8.76%) compared to IYF (4.27%). In terms of maximum drawdown, IYZ dropped -77.11% vs IYF's -79.09%.

On 10-year performance, IYF leads with 13.53% vs 5.94% for IYZ. Both ETFs have the same 0.42% expense ratio. On volatility, IYF has been the lower-risk option at 4.27%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 10-year period, IYF has performed better with a 13.53% return vs 5.94%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

IYZ and IYF have the same expense ratio: 0.42% per year.

IYZ has the higher dividend yield at 1.53%, compared with 1.49% for IYF.

IYZ is categorized as Communications Equities, while IYF is Financials Equities. IYZ tracks Dow Jones U.S. Select Telecommunications Index, while IYF tracks Dow Jones U.S. Financials Index.

IYZ currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (3.02 vs 0.84), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for IYZ and IYF

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer