PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
IYW vs. IETC
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

IYW vs. IETC - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in iShares U.S. Technology ETF (IYW) and iShares Evolved U.S. Technology ETF (IETC). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, IYW achieves a 30.23% return, which is significantly higher than IETC's 16.36% return.


IYW

1D
0.76%
1M
17.61%
YTD
30.23%
6M
29.45%
1Y
63.02%
3Y*
35.66%
5Y*
23.59%
10Y*
26.22%

IETC

1D
-0.13%
1M
14.36%
YTD
16.36%
6M
15.89%
1Y
34.78%
3Y*
31.47%
5Y*
19.15%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

IYW vs. IETC - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024202320222021202020192018
IYW
iShares U.S. Technology ETF
30.23%25.38%30.25%65.44%-34.83%35.44%47.45%46.64%-2.88%
IETC
iShares Evolved U.S. Technology ETF
16.36%19.56%37.57%54.35%-32.78%29.73%46.59%43.09%-3.52%

Correlation

The correlation between IYW and IETC is 0.91, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.91

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.94

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.96

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 26, 2018

0.96

The correlation between IYW and IETC has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.91 to 0.96 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

IYW vs. IETC — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

IYW
IYW Risk / Return Rank: 7979
Overall Rank
IYW Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9090
Sharpe Ratio Rank
IYW Sortino Ratio Rank: 8585
Sortino Ratio Rank
IYW Omega Ratio Rank: 8383
Omega Ratio Rank
IYW Calmar Ratio Rank: 7272
Calmar Ratio Rank
IYW Martin Ratio Rank: 6565
Martin Ratio Rank

IETC
IETC Risk / Return Rank: 4040
Overall Rank
IETC Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4848
Sharpe Ratio Rank
IETC Sortino Ratio Rank: 4545
Sortino Ratio Rank
IETC Omega Ratio Rank: 4444
Omega Ratio Rank
IETC Calmar Ratio Rank: 3434
Calmar Ratio Rank
IETC Martin Ratio Rank: 3131
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

IYW vs. IETC - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares U.S. Technology ETF (IYW) and iShares Evolved U.S. Technology ETF (IETC). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


IYWIETCDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

3.16

1.67

+1.49

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

3.87

2.23

+1.64

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.51

1.28

+0.23

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

3.62

1.69

+1.93

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

11.88

4.77

+7.11

IYW vs. IETC - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current IYW Sharpe Ratio is 3.16, which is higher than the IETC Sharpe Ratio of 1.67. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of IYW and IETC, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


IYWIETCDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

3.16

1.67

+1.49

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.92

0.79

+0.13

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

1.05

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.36

0.88

-0.53

Drawdowns

IYW vs. IETC - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum IYW drawdown since its inception was -81.90%, which is greater than IETC's maximum drawdown of -38.48%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for IYW and IETC.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


IYWIETCDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-81.90%

-38.48%

-43.42%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-17.81%

-21.19%

+3.38%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-26.47%

-25.17%

-1.30%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-39.44%

-38.48%

-0.96%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-39.44%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

0.00%

-0.13%

+0.13%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-34.66%

-8.14%

-26.52%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

5.43%

7.51%

-2.08%

Volatility

IYW vs. IETC - Volatility Comparison

iShares U.S. Technology ETF (IYW) has a higher volatility of 6.11% compared to iShares Evolved U.S. Technology ETF (IETC) at 5.80%. This indicates that IYW's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than IETC based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


IYWIETCDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

6.11%

5.80%

+0.31%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

15.81%

16.34%

-0.53%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

20.07%

20.93%

-0.86%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

25.87%

24.52%

+1.35%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

25.10%

25.37%

-0.27%

IYW vs. IETC - Expense Ratio Comparison

IYW has a 0.38% expense ratio, which is higher than IETC's 0.18% expense ratio.


Dividends

IYW vs. IETC - Dividend Comparison

IYW's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.10%, less than IETC's 0.33% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
IETC
iShares Evolved U.S. Technology ETF
0.33%0.38%0.52%0.79%0.92%0.73%0.48%0.95%1.27%0.00%0.00%0.00%
IYW
iShares U.S. Technology ETF
0.10%0.14%0.21%0.34%0.50%0.31%0.56%0.72%0.92%0.82%1.14%1.12%

Frequently Asked Questions


With a correlation of 0.91, IYW and IETC move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

IYW has higher volatility (6.11%) compared to IETC (5.80%). In terms of maximum drawdown, IYW dropped -81.90% vs IETC's -38.48%.

On 5-year performance, IYW leads with 23.59% vs 19.15% for IETC. On fees, IETC is cheaper at 0.18% per year. On volatility, IETC has been the lower-risk option at 5.80%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 5-year period, IYW has performed better with a 23.59% return vs 19.15%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

IETC is cheaper with a 0.18% expense ratio, compared with 0.38% for IYW.

IETC has the higher dividend yield at 0.33%, compared with 0.10% for IYW.

Their fees differ too: 0.38% for IYW and 0.18% for IETC.

IYW currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (3.16 vs 1.67), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for IYW and IETC

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer