IYW vs. FXF
IYW (iShares U.S. Technology ETF) and FXF (Invesco CurrencyShares® Swiss Franc Trust) are both exchange-traded funds - IYW is a Technology Equities fund tracking the Russell 1000 Technology RIC 22.5/45 Capped Index, while FXF is a Currency fund tracking the Swiss Franc. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, IYW returned 25.63%/yr vs 1.06%/yr for FXF. At a 0.02 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. IYW charges 0.38%/yr vs 0.40%/yr for FXF.
Performance
IYW vs. FXF - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, IYW achieves a 22.66% return, which is significantly higher than FXF's -0.80% return. Over the past 10 years, IYW has outperformed FXF with an annualized return of 25.63%, while FXF has yielded a comparatively lower 1.06% annualized return.
IYW
- 1D
- 0.61%
- 1M
- 1.73%
- YTD
- 22.66%
- 6M
- 23.40%
- 1Y
- 47.94%
- 3Y*
- 32.06%
- 5Y*
- 21.19%
- 10Y*
- 25.63%
FXF
- 1D
- -0.15%
- 1M
- -1.88%
- YTD
- -0.80%
- 6M
- -0.32%
- 1Y
- 1.23%
- 3Y*
- 4.05%
- 5Y*
- 1.88%
- 10Y*
- 1.06%
IYW vs. FXF - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
IYW iShares U.S. Technology ETF | 22.66% | 25.38% | 30.25% | 65.44% | -34.83% | 35.44% | 47.45% | 46.64% | -0.93% | 36.60% |
FXF Invesco CurrencyShares® Swiss Franc Trust | -0.80% | 14.04% | -7.46% | 9.63% | -2.29% | -4.08% | 8.18% | 0.32% | -2.01% | 3.31% |
Correlation
The correlation between IYW and FXF is 0.16, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.16 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.06 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.13 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.05 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 26, 2006 | 0.02 |
The correlation between IYW and FXF shifts across timeframes, from 0.02 (all time) to 0.16 (1 year), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
IYW vs. FXF — Risk / Return Rank
IYW
FXF
IYW vs. FXF - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares U.S. Technology ETF (IYW) and Invesco CurrencyShares® Swiss Franc Trust (FXF). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| IYW | FXF | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +2.08 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +2.51 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.38 | 1.03 | +0.34 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.70 | 0.25 | +2.46 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 8.68 | 0.54 | +8.14 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
IYW vs. FXF - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum IYW drawdown since its inception was -81.90%, which is greater than FXF's maximum drawdown of -35.58%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for IYW and FXF.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| IYW | FXF | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -81.90% | -35.58% | -46.32% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -17.81% | -4.97% | -12.84% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -26.47% | -8.52% | -17.95% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -39.44% | -12.68% | -26.76% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -39.44% | -15.04% | -24.40% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -5.81% | -19.02% | +13.21% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -34.62% | -20.83% | -13.79% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 5.54% | 2.28% | +3.26% |
Volatility
IYW vs. FXF - Volatility Comparison
iShares U.S. Technology ETF (IYW) has a higher volatility of 9.41% compared to Invesco CurrencyShares® Swiss Franc Trust (FXF) at 1.81%. This indicates that IYW's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than FXF based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| IYW | FXF | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 9.41% | 1.81% | +7.60% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 17.67% | 5.56% | +12.11% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 21.47% | 7.49% | +13.98% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 26.07% | 8.33% | +17.74% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 25.20% | 7.57% | +17.63% |
IYW vs. FXF - Expense Ratio Comparison
IYW has a 0.38% expense ratio, which is lower than FXF's 0.40% expense ratio.
Dividends
IYW vs. FXF - Dividend Comparison
IYW's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.11%, while FXF has not paid dividends to shareholders.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FXF Invesco CurrencyShares® Swiss Franc Trust | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.03% | 0.02% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
IYW iShares U.S. Technology ETF | 0.11% | 0.14% | 0.21% | 0.34% | 0.50% | 0.31% | 0.56% | 0.72% | 0.92% | 0.82% | 1.14% | 1.12% |
Frequently Asked Questions
IYW and FXF have a correlation of 0.16, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
IYW has higher volatility (9.41%) compared to FXF (1.81%). In terms of maximum drawdown, IYW dropped -81.90% vs FXF's -35.58%.
On 10-year performance, IYW leads with 25.63% vs 1.06% for FXF. On fees, IYW is cheaper at 0.38% per year. On volatility, FXF has been the lower-risk option at 1.81%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 10-year period, IYW has performed better with a 25.63% return vs 1.06%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
IYW is cheaper with a 0.38% expense ratio, compared with 0.40% for FXF.
IYW has the higher dividend yield at 0.11%, compared with 0.00% for FXF.
IYW is categorized as Technology Equities, while FXF is Currency. IYW tracks Russell 1000 Technology RIC 22.5/45 Capped Index, while FXF tracks Swiss Franc. They also come from different issuers: iShares and Invesco. Their fees differ too: 0.38% for IYW and 0.40% for FXF.
IYW currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.24 vs 0.17), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for IYW and FXF
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer