IYRI vs. LQTI

Last updated Jun 4, 2026

IYRI (NEOS Real Estate High Income ETF) and LQTI (FT Vest Investment Grade & Target Income ETF) are both Derivative Income funds. IYRI is passively managed, while LQTI is actively managed. Over the past year, IYRI returned 8.34% vs 5.69% for LQTI. At a 0.35 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. IYRI charges 0.68%/yr vs 0.65%/yr for LQTI.

Performance

IYRI vs. LQTI - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in NEOS Real Estate High Income ETF (IYRI) and FT Vest Investment Grade & Target Income ETF (LQTI). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, IYRI achieves a 4.08% return, which is significantly higher than LQTI's 0.16% return.

IYRI

• 1D: 0.17%
• 1M: -1.04%
• YTD: 4.08%
• 6M: 3.47%
• 1Y: 8.34%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

LQTI

• 1D: -0.26%
• 1M: 0.41%
• YTD: 0.16%
• 6M: -0.04%
• 1Y: 5.69%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

IYRI vs. LQTI - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025
IYRI NEOS Real Estate High Income ETF	4.08%	3.99%
LQTI FT Vest Investment Grade & Target Income ETF	0.16%	6.69%

Correlation

The correlation between IYRI and LQTI is 0.36, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.36
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 14, 2025	0.35

Return for Risk

IYRI vs. LQTI — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

IYRI

IYRI Risk / Return Rank: 23
IYRI Sharpe Ratio Rank: 23
IYRI Sortino Ratio Rank: 21
IYRI Omega Ratio Rank: 22
IYRI Calmar Ratio Rank: 24
IYRI Martin Ratio Rank: 28

LQTI

LQTI Risk / Return Rank: 32
LQTI Sharpe Ratio Rank: 31
LQTI Sortino Ratio Rank: 30
LQTI Omega Ratio Rank: 29
LQTI Calmar Ratio Rank: 34
LQTI Martin Ratio Rank: 34

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

IYRI vs. LQTI - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for NEOS Real Estate High Income ETF (IYRI) and FT Vest Investment Grade & Target Income ETF (LQTI). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	IYRI	LQTI	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	0.81	1.12	-0.31
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	1.16	1.64	-0.47
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.15	1.19	-0.05
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	1.11	1.68	-0.57
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	4.00	5.15	-1.14
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

IYRI vs. LQTI - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current IYRI Sharpe Ratio is 0.81, which is comparable to the LQTI Sharpe Ratio of 1.12. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of IYRI and LQTI, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	IYRI	LQTI	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.81	1.12	-0.31
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.68	0.88	-0.20

Drawdowns

IYRI vs. LQTI - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum IYRI drawdown since its inception was -12.12%, which is greater than LQTI's maximum drawdown of -3.41%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for IYRI and LQTI.

Drawdown Indicators

	IYRI	LQTI	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-12.12%	-3.41%	-8.71%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-7.53%	-3.41%	-4.12%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-2.17%	-1.44%	-0.73%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-1.72%	-0.88%	-0.84%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	2.09%	1.11%	+0.98%

Volatility

IYRI vs. LQTI - Volatility Comparison

NEOS Real Estate High Income ETF (IYRI) has a higher volatility of 3.03% compared to FT Vest Investment Grade & Target Income ETF (LQTI) at 1.65%. This indicates that IYRI's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than LQTI based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	IYRI	LQTI	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	3.03%	1.65%	+1.38%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	7.17%	4.02%	+3.15%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	10.31%	5.10%	+5.21%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	13.07%	5.97%	+7.10%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	13.07%	5.97%	+7.10%

IYRI vs. LQTI - Expense Ratio Comparison

IYRI has a 0.68% expense ratio, which is higher than LQTI's 0.65% expense ratio.

Dividends

IYRI vs. LQTI - Dividend Comparison

IYRI's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 11.27%, more than LQTI's 9.11% yield.

Position	TTM	2025
IYRI NEOS Real Estate High Income ETF	11.27%	11.72%
LQTI FT Vest Investment Grade & Target Income ETF	9.11%	7.01%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both IYRI and LQTI in my portfolio?

IYRI and LQTI have a correlation of 0.36, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, IYRI or LQTI?

IYRI has higher volatility (3.03%) compared to LQTI (1.65%). In terms of maximum drawdown, IYRI dropped -12.12% vs LQTI's -3.41%.

Which ETF is better, IYRI or LQTI?

On 1-year performance, IYRI leads with 8.34% vs 5.69% for LQTI. On fees, LQTI is cheaper at 0.65% per year. On volatility, LQTI has been the lower-risk option at 1.65%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, IYRI or LQTI?

Over the 1-year period, IYRI has performed better with a 8.34% return vs 5.69%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, IYRI or LQTI?

LQTI is cheaper with a 0.65% expense ratio, compared with 0.68% for IYRI.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, IYRI or LQTI?

IYRI has the higher dividend yield at 11.27%, compared with 9.11% for LQTI.

What is the main difference between IYRI and LQTI?

They also come from different issuers: Neos and FT Vest. Their fees differ too: 0.68% for IYRI and 0.65% for LQTI.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

LQTI currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.12 vs 0.81), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.