PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
IYR vs. IYF
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

IYR vs. IYF - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in iShares U.S. Real Estate ETF (IYR) and iShares U.S. Financials ETF (IYF). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, IYR achieves a 11.47% return, which is significantly higher than IYF's -0.19% return. Over the past 10 years, IYR has underperformed IYF with an annualized return of 5.97%, while IYF has yielded a comparatively higher 13.53% annualized return.


IYR

1D
0.89%
1M
3.00%
YTD
11.47%
6M
11.46%
1Y
12.40%
3Y*
9.71%
5Y*
2.47%
10Y*
5.97%

IYF

1D
1.38%
1M
4.53%
YTD
-0.19%
6M
-0.21%
1Y
13.73%
3Y*
21.71%
5Y*
10.87%
10Y*
13.53%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

IYR vs. IYF - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
IYR
iShares U.S. Real Estate ETF
11.47%3.38%4.41%11.89%-25.51%38.74%-5.23%28.21%-4.33%9.31%
IYF
iShares U.S. Financials ETF
-0.19%18.25%31.30%15.32%-11.33%31.60%-1.00%31.86%-9.39%19.58%

Correlation

The correlation between IYR and IYF is 0.51, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.51

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.59

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.63

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.59

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 19, 2000

0.66

The correlation between IYR and IYF shifts across timeframes, from 0.51 (1 year) to 0.66 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

IYR vs. IYF — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

IYR
IYR Risk / Return Rank: 2828
Overall Rank
IYR Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2727
Sharpe Ratio Rank
IYR Sortino Ratio Rank: 2525
Sortino Ratio Rank
IYR Omega Ratio Rank: 2525
Omega Ratio Rank
IYR Calmar Ratio Rank: 3131
Calmar Ratio Rank
IYR Martin Ratio Rank: 3232
Martin Ratio Rank

IYF
IYF Risk / Return Rank: 2424
Overall Rank
IYF Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2727
Sharpe Ratio Rank
IYF Sortino Ratio Rank: 2525
Sortino Ratio Rank
IYF Omega Ratio Rank: 2525
Omega Ratio Rank
IYF Calmar Ratio Rank: 2222
Calmar Ratio Rank
IYF Martin Ratio Rank: 2222
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

IYR vs. IYF - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares U.S. Real Estate ETF (IYR) and iShares U.S. Financials ETF (IYF). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


IYRIYFDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.01

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.03

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.15

1.15

0.00

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.34

0.88

+0.46

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

4.19

2.38

+1.81

IYR vs. IYF - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current IYR Sharpe Ratio is 0.84, which is comparable to the IYF Sharpe Ratio of 0.84. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of IYR and IYF, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

IYR vs. IYF - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum IYR drawdown since its inception was -74.13%, smaller than the maximum IYF drawdown of -79.09%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for IYR and IYF.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


IYRIYFDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-74.13%

-79.09%

+4.96%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-8.54%

-13.88%

+5.34%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-17.52%

-16.60%

-0.92%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-33.75%

-25.06%

-8.69%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-42.32%

-42.57%

+0.25%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

0.00%

-3.25%

+3.25%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-12.89%

-17.59%

+4.70%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.73%

5.13%

-2.40%

Volatility

IYR vs. IYF - Volatility Comparison

iShares U.S. Real Estate ETF (IYR) has a higher volatility of 4.80% compared to iShares U.S. Financials ETF (IYF) at 4.27%. This indicates that IYR's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than IYF based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


IYRIYFDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

4.80%

4.27%

+0.53%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

9.87%

11.12%

-1.25%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

13.58%

14.58%

-1.00%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

18.76%

19.04%

-0.28%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

20.34%

20.90%

-0.56%

IYR vs. IYF - Expense Ratio Comparison

Both IYR and IYF have an expense ratio of 0.42%.


Dividends

IYR vs. IYF - Dividend Comparison

IYR's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.15%, more than IYF's 1.49% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
IYF
iShares U.S. Financials ETF
1.49%1.32%1.29%1.67%1.86%1.27%1.72%1.64%1.90%1.46%1.67%1.66%
IYR
iShares U.S. Real Estate ETF
2.15%2.48%2.57%2.75%2.92%2.06%2.58%3.05%3.53%3.73%4.41%3.92%

Frequently Asked Questions


IYR and IYF have a correlation of 0.51, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

IYR has higher volatility (4.80%) compared to IYF (4.27%). In terms of maximum drawdown, IYR dropped -74.13% vs IYF's -79.09%.

On 10-year performance, IYF leads with 13.53% vs 5.97% for IYR. Both ETFs have the same 0.42% expense ratio. On volatility, IYF has been the lower-risk option at 4.27%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 10-year period, IYF has performed better with a 13.53% return vs 5.97%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

IYR and IYF have the same expense ratio: 0.42% per year.

IYR has the higher dividend yield at 2.15%, compared with 1.49% for IYF.

IYR is categorized as REIT, while IYF is Financials Equities. IYR tracks Dow Jones U.S. Real Estate Index, while IYF tracks Dow Jones U.S. Financials Index.

IYR currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.84 vs 0.84), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for IYR and IYF

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer