PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
IYLD vs. MFUL
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

IYLD vs. MFUL - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in iShares Morningstar Multi-Asset Income ETF (IYLD) and Mindful Conservative ETF (MFUL). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, IYLD achieves a 5.72% return, which is significantly higher than MFUL's 2.75% return.


IYLD

1D
-0.18%
1M
0.34%
6M
2.24%
YTD
5.72%
1Y
13.16%
3Y*
9.75%
5Y*
3.22%
10Y*
3.84%
ALL TIME*
4.33%

MFUL

1D
-0.03%
1M
-0.18%
6M
1.42%
YTD
2.75%
1Y
4.79%
3Y*
4.38%
5Y*
10Y*
ALL TIME*
-0.08%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison


PositionAvg. Volume Value (2W)Avg. Volume Value (1M)Avg. Volume Value (3M)
$181.04K$278.59K$373.50K
$6.81K$15.69K$11.16K

IYLD vs. MFUL - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024202320222021
IYLD
iShares Morningstar Multi-Asset Income ETF
5.72%15.44%2.00%12.55%-16.80%0.73%
MFUL
Mindful Conservative ETF
2.75%4.51%5.36%2.24%-12.46%-1.61%

Correlation

The correlation between IYLD and MFUL is 0.75, which is moderate. They have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently, sharing some price drivers without tracking each other closely.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.

0.75

Correlation (3Y)
Balances recent behavior with more history.

0.71

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 3, 2021

0.59

The correlation between IYLD and MFUL shifts across timeframes, from 0.59 (all time) to 0.75 (1 year), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

IYLD vs. MFUL — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

IYLD
IYLD Risk / Return Rank: 8787
Overall Rank
IYLD Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9191
Sharpe Ratio Rank
IYLD Sortino Ratio Rank: 9292
Sortino Ratio Rank
IYLD Omega Ratio Rank: 9191
Omega Ratio Rank
IYLD Calmar Ratio Rank: 7979
Calmar Ratio Rank
IYLD Martin Ratio Rank: 8383
Martin Ratio Rank

MFUL
MFUL Risk / Return Rank: 4242
Overall Rank
MFUL Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4343
Sharpe Ratio Rank
MFUL Sortino Ratio Rank: 4040
Sortino Ratio Rank
MFUL Omega Ratio Rank: 4242
Omega Ratio Rank
MFUL Calmar Ratio Rank: 3939
Calmar Ratio Rank
MFUL Martin Ratio Rank: 4545
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

IYLD vs. MFUL - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares Morningstar Multi-Asset Income ETF (IYLD) and Mindful Conservative ETF (MFUL). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


IYLDMFULDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+1.21

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+1.90

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.44

1.20

+0.24

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.85

1.38

+1.47

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

11.17

4.99

+6.18

IYLD vs. MFUL - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current IYLD Sharpe Ratio is 2.28, which is higher than the MFUL Sharpe Ratio of 1.07. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of IYLD and MFUL, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

IYLD vs. MFUL - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum IYLD drawdown since its inception was -30.23%, which is greater than MFUL's maximum drawdown of -16.41%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for IYLD and MFUL.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


IYLDMFULDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-30.23%

-16.41%

-13.82%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-4.63%

-3.36%

-1.27%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-5.20%

-4.74%

-0.46%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-22.57%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-30.23%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.18%

-0.97%

+0.79%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-4.49%

-9.20%

+4.71%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.18%

0.93%

+0.25%

Volatility

IYLD vs. MFUL - Volatility Comparison

iShares Morningstar Multi-Asset Income ETF (IYLD) has a higher volatility of 1.40% compared to Mindful Conservative ETF (MFUL) at 1.07%. This indicates that IYLD's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than MFUL based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


IYLDMFULDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

1.40%

1.07%

+0.33%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

4.76%

3.58%

+1.18%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

5.78%

4.31%

+1.47%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

7.88%

4.27%

+3.61%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

9.54%

4.27%

+5.27%

IYLD vs. MFUL - Expense Ratio Comparison

IYLD has a 0.60% expense ratio, which is lower than MFUL's 1.10% expense ratio.


Dividends

IYLD vs. MFUL - Dividend Comparison

IYLD's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.61%, more than MFUL's 2.41% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
IYLD
iShares Morningstar Multi-Asset Income ETF
4.61%4.72%5.32%5.76%5.45%3.47%4.38%5.25%5.78%4.22%4.84%5.26%
MFUL
Mindful Conservative ETF
2.41%3.31%2.59%5.00%0.29%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


IYLD and MFUL have a correlation of 0.75, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

IYLD has higher volatility (1.40%) compared to MFUL (1.07%). In terms of maximum drawdown, IYLD dropped -30.23% vs MFUL's -16.41%.

On 3-year performance, IYLD leads with 9.75% vs 4.38% for MFUL. On fees, IYLD is cheaper at 0.60% per year. On volatility, MFUL has been the lower-risk option at 1.07%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 3-year period, IYLD has performed better with a 9.75% return vs 4.38%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

IYLD is cheaper with a 0.60% expense ratio, compared with 1.10% for MFUL.

IYLD has the higher dividend yield at 4.61%, compared with 2.41% for MFUL.

They also come from different issuers: iShares and Mohr. Their fees differ too: 0.60% for IYLD and 1.10% for MFUL.

IYLD currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.28 vs 1.07), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for IYLD and MFUL

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer