IYLD vs. ACWI
IYLD (iShares Morningstar Multi-Asset Income ETF) and ACWI (iShares MSCI ACWI ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - IYLD is a Diversified Portfolio fund tracking the Morningstar Multi-Asset High Income Index, while ACWI is a Global Equities fund tracking the MSCI All Country World Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, IYLD returned 4.00%/yr vs 12.85%/yr for ACWI. A 0.70 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. IYLD charges 0.60%/yr vs 0.32%/yr for ACWI.
Performance
IYLD vs. ACWI - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, IYLD achieves a 4.95% return, which is significantly lower than ACWI's 12.13% return. Over the past 10 years, IYLD has underperformed ACWI with an annualized return of 4.00%, while ACWI has yielded a comparatively higher 12.85% annualized return.
IYLD
- 1D
- -0.20%
- 1M
- 1.01%
- YTD
- 4.95%
- 6M
- 5.45%
- 1Y
- 14.02%
- 3Y*
- 10.59%
- 5Y*
- 3.36%
- 10Y*
- 4.00%
ACWI
- 1D
- -0.83%
- 1M
- 5.28%
- YTD
- 12.13%
- 6M
- 12.96%
- 1Y
- 29.18%
- 3Y*
- 21.15%
- 5Y*
- 11.28%
- 10Y*
- 12.85%
IYLD vs. ACWI - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
IYLD iShares Morningstar Multi-Asset Income ETF | 4.95% | 15.44% | 2.00% | 12.55% | -16.80% | 3.37% | -1.18% | 15.82% | -4.77% | 10.90% |
ACWI iShares MSCI ACWI ETF | 12.13% | 22.41% | 17.45% | 22.27% | -18.39% | 18.66% | 16.34% | 26.59% | -9.19% | 24.33% |
Correlation
The correlation between IYLD and ACWI is 0.77, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.77 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.73 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.73 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.74 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 9, 2012 | 0.70 |
The correlation between IYLD and ACWI has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.70 to 0.77 - a consistent structural relationship.
IYLD vs. ACWI - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
IYLD
ACWI
Financial Services
Real Estate
Industrials
Technology
Utilities
Consumer Cyclical
Basic Materials
Healthcare
Consumer Defensive
Communication Services
Energy
Financial Services
IYLD
ACWI
Real Estate
IYLD
ACWI
Industrials
IYLD
ACWI
Technology
IYLD
ACWI
Utilities
IYLD
ACWI
Consumer Cyclical
IYLD
ACWI
Basic Materials
IYLD
ACWI
Healthcare
IYLD
ACWI
Consumer Defensive
IYLD
ACWI
Communication Services
IYLD
ACWI
Energy
IYLD
ACWI
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
IYLD vs. ACWI — Risk / Return Rank
IYLD
ACWI
IYLD vs. ACWI - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares Morningstar Multi-Asset Income ETF (IYLD) and iShares MSCI ACWI ETF (ACWI). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| IYLD | ACWI | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 2.46 | 2.29 | +0.16 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 3.65 | 3.17 | +0.48 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.47 | 1.41 | +0.06 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 3.04 | 3.01 | +0.02 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 11.80 | 13.53 | -1.73 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| IYLD | ACWI | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.46 | 2.29 | +0.16 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.43 | 0.71 | -0.28 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.42 | 0.75 | -0.33 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.50 | 0.43 | +0.07 |
Drawdowns
IYLD vs. ACWI - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum IYLD drawdown since its inception was -30.23%, smaller than the maximum ACWI drawdown of -56.00%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for IYLD and ACWI.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| IYLD | ACWI | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -30.23% | -56.00% | +25.77% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -4.63% | -9.73% | +5.10% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -5.20% | -16.55% | +11.35% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -22.57% | -26.42% | +3.85% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -30.23% | -33.53% | +3.30% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.55% | -0.83% | +0.28% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -4.53% | -8.61% | +4.08% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 1.19% | 2.16% | -0.97% |
Volatility
IYLD vs. ACWI - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for iShares Morningstar Multi-Asset Income ETF (IYLD) is 1.53%, while iShares MSCI ACWI ETF (ACWI) has a volatility of 3.93%. This indicates that IYLD experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than ACWI based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| IYLD | ACWI | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 1.53% | 3.93% | -2.40% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 4.72% | 10.29% | -5.57% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 5.73% | 12.78% | -7.05% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 7.86% | 16.05% | -8.19% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 9.58% | 17.11% | -7.53% |
IYLD vs. ACWI - Expense Ratio Comparison
IYLD has a 0.60% expense ratio, which is higher than ACWI's 0.32% expense ratio.
Dividends
IYLD vs. ACWI - Dividend Comparison
IYLD's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.61%, more than ACWI's 1.38% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
ACWI iShares MSCI ACWI ETF | 1.38% | 1.55% | 1.70% | 1.88% | 1.79% | 1.71% | 1.43% | 2.33% | 2.18% | 1.94% | 2.19% | 2.56% |
IYLD iShares Morningstar Multi-Asset Income ETF | 4.61% | 4.72% | 5.32% | 5.76% | 5.45% | 3.47% | 4.38% | 5.25% | 5.78% | 4.22% | 4.84% | 5.26% |
Frequently Asked Questions
IYLD and ACWI have a correlation of 0.77, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
ACWI has higher volatility (3.93%) compared to IYLD (1.53%). In terms of maximum drawdown, IYLD dropped -30.23% vs ACWI's -56.00%.
On 10-year performance, ACWI leads with 12.85% vs 4.00% for IYLD. On fees, ACWI is cheaper at 0.32% per year. On volatility, IYLD has been the lower-risk option at 1.53%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 10-year period, ACWI has performed better with a 12.85% return vs 4.00%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
ACWI is cheaper with a 0.32% expense ratio, compared with 0.60% for IYLD.
IYLD has the higher dividend yield at 4.61%, compared with 1.38% for ACWI.
IYLD is categorized as Diversified Portfolio, while ACWI is Global Equities. IYLD tracks Morningstar Multi-Asset High Income Index, while ACWI tracks MSCI All Country World Index. Their fees differ too: 0.60% for IYLD and 0.32% for ACWI.
IYLD currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.46 vs 2.29), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for IYLD and ACWI
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer