PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
IYJ vs. TOLZ
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

IYJ vs. TOLZ - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in iShares U.S. Industrials ETF (IYJ) and ProShares DJ Brookfield Global Infrastructure ETF (TOLZ). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, IYJ achieves a 5.81% return, which is significantly lower than TOLZ's 11.31% return. Over the past 10 years, IYJ has outperformed TOLZ with an annualized return of 12.31%, while TOLZ has yielded a comparatively lower 7.75% annualized return.


IYJ

1D
-0.62%
1M
0.44%
YTD
5.81%
6M
7.55%
1Y
12.86%
3Y*
16.95%
5Y*
7.87%
10Y*
12.31%

TOLZ

1D
-0.10%
1M
-1.82%
YTD
11.31%
6M
11.51%
1Y
13.97%
3Y*
14.17%
5Y*
8.46%
10Y*
7.75%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

IYJ vs. TOLZ - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
IYJ
iShares U.S. Industrials ETF
5.81%11.94%17.82%19.94%-13.53%17.02%17.37%32.27%-11.69%23.98%
TOLZ
ProShares DJ Brookfield Global Infrastructure ETF
11.31%14.76%11.67%6.18%-4.25%20.47%-9.46%26.84%-7.90%13.28%

Correlation

The correlation between IYJ and TOLZ is 0.32, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.32

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.48

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.60

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.60

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 28, 2014

0.61

Over the past year, the correlation between IYJ and TOLZ has dropped to 0.32 - well below their long-term average of 0.61, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.

IYJ vs. TOLZ - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
IYJ
TOLZ

Industrials

66.6%
5.2%

Financial Services

17.0%
2.0%

Technology

6.6%
0.4%

Basic Materials

4.0%

-

Utilities

3.6%
22.2%

Consumer Cyclical

1.7%
0.8%

Healthcare

0.4%

-

Communication Services

-

-

Consumer Defensive

-

4.5%

Energy

-

35.4%

Real Estate

-

8.0%

Industrials

IYJ
66.6%
TOLZ
5.2%

Financial Services

IYJ
17.0%
TOLZ
2.0%

Technology

IYJ
6.6%
TOLZ
0.4%

Basic Materials

IYJ
4.0%
TOLZ

-

Utilities

IYJ
3.6%
TOLZ
22.2%

Consumer Cyclical

IYJ
1.7%
TOLZ
0.8%

Healthcare

IYJ
0.4%
TOLZ

-

Communication Services

IYJ

-

TOLZ

-

Consumer Defensive

IYJ

-

TOLZ
4.5%

Energy

IYJ

-

TOLZ
35.4%

Real Estate

IYJ

-

TOLZ
8.0%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

IYJ vs. TOLZ — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

IYJ
IYJ Risk / Return Rank: 2525
Overall Rank
IYJ Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2424
Sharpe Ratio Rank
IYJ Sortino Ratio Rank: 2424
Sortino Ratio Rank
IYJ Omega Ratio Rank: 2222
Omega Ratio Rank
IYJ Calmar Ratio Rank: 2424
Calmar Ratio Rank
IYJ Martin Ratio Rank: 2828
Martin Ratio Rank

TOLZ
TOLZ Risk / Return Rank: 4343
Overall Rank
TOLZ Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3838
Sharpe Ratio Rank
TOLZ Sortino Ratio Rank: 3838
Sortino Ratio Rank
TOLZ Omega Ratio Rank: 3535
Omega Ratio Rank
TOLZ Calmar Ratio Rank: 5555
Calmar Ratio Rank
TOLZ Martin Ratio Rank: 4949
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

IYJ vs. TOLZ - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares U.S. Industrials ETF (IYJ) and ProShares DJ Brookfield Global Infrastructure ETF (TOLZ). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


IYJTOLZDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

0.86

1.36

-0.50

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

1.32

1.99

-0.66

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.15

1.23

-0.08

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

1.13

2.71

-1.58

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

4.10

8.20

-4.10

IYJ vs. TOLZ - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current IYJ Sharpe Ratio is 0.86, which is lower than the TOLZ Sharpe Ratio of 1.36. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of IYJ and TOLZ, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


IYJTOLZDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.86

1.36

-0.50

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.44

0.61

-0.17

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.62

0.48

+0.14

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.37

0.41

-0.04

Drawdowns

IYJ vs. TOLZ - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum IYJ drawdown since its inception was -61.97%, which is greater than TOLZ's maximum drawdown of -39.33%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for IYJ and TOLZ.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


IYJTOLZDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-61.97%

-39.33%

-22.64%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-11.39%

-5.18%

-6.21%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-19.67%

-11.94%

-7.73%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-26.24%

-21.85%

-4.39%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-40.20%

-39.33%

-0.87%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-3.24%

-3.13%

-0.11%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-11.21%

-6.63%

-4.58%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.14%

1.71%

+1.43%

Volatility

IYJ vs. TOLZ - Volatility Comparison

iShares U.S. Industrials ETF (IYJ) has a higher volatility of 4.05% compared to ProShares DJ Brookfield Global Infrastructure ETF (TOLZ) at 3.37%. This indicates that IYJ's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than TOLZ based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


IYJTOLZDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

4.05%

3.37%

+0.68%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

11.88%

8.20%

+3.68%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

15.05%

10.29%

+4.76%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

18.04%

13.99%

+4.05%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

19.87%

16.29%

+3.58%

IYJ vs. TOLZ - Expense Ratio Comparison

IYJ has a 0.38% expense ratio, which is lower than TOLZ's 0.46% expense ratio.


Dividends

IYJ vs. TOLZ - Dividend Comparison

IYJ's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.78%, less than TOLZ's 3.66% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
IYJ
iShares U.S. Industrials ETF
0.78%0.83%0.88%1.05%1.05%0.76%1.01%1.32%1.43%1.29%1.38%1.53%
TOLZ
ProShares DJ Brookfield Global Infrastructure ETF
3.66%3.99%3.53%3.34%3.01%3.28%3.16%2.96%3.63%3.30%2.62%3.67%

Frequently Asked Questions


IYJ and TOLZ have a correlation of 0.32, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

IYJ has higher volatility (4.05%) compared to TOLZ (3.37%). In terms of maximum drawdown, IYJ dropped -61.97% vs TOLZ's -39.33%.

On 10-year performance, IYJ leads with 12.31% vs 7.75% for TOLZ. On fees, IYJ is cheaper at 0.38% per year. On volatility, TOLZ has been the lower-risk option at 3.37%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 10-year period, IYJ has performed better with a 12.31% return vs 7.75%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

IYJ is cheaper with a 0.38% expense ratio, compared with 0.46% for TOLZ.

TOLZ has the higher dividend yield at 3.66%, compared with 0.78% for IYJ.

IYJ tracks Dow Jones U.S. Industrials Index, while TOLZ tracks Dow Jones Brookfield Global Infrastructure Composite Index. They also come from different issuers: iShares and ProShares. Their fees differ too: 0.38% for IYJ and 0.46% for TOLZ.

TOLZ currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.36 vs 0.86), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for IYJ and TOLZ

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer